Financial Elder Abuse Book

You my order a copy from Amazon

Amazon UK goo.gl/vbnCqF

Amazon USA goo.gl/Mg6jDh

Fast PDF Download Here

Comments

“Well written account of the injustice perpetrated against an innocent man aided and abetted by the Irish legal profession to steal this elderly man’s money from him. The solicitor should be charged and jailed.”

“This is a very sad case of an elderly man being cheated by the law. It’s very detailed and definitely worth a read, cases like this abound in Ireland, where people will behave in truly shameful manner where land is concerned.”

“Shocking Corruption Exposed by Elderly Farmer. This is Rural Ireland 2015. You won’t see this on 6.01 News.”

“To commit fraud is an offense in Ireland. But the prosecution for such will depend very much on where you reside on the social scale #vinb”

“This story highlights the blue-shirt mentality of current regime. People should read it and stand up against FG cowards and Bullies.”

“This type of practice is unacceptable and must undergo a radical review and renewal. Irish people, be they farmers or academics (one doesn’t exclude the other) trust these kind of professions to represent their clients interests. In this case it seems like that trust was exploited for personal gain.”

“This is Disgusting Travesty of Justice these Solicitors should be disbarred from Practicing for this ABUSE of their Position they are Traitors to our People Greedy disgusting Cretins who should be arrested & Jailed for their terrible ABUSE of this Man! WE are watching from Afar & We promise you we will get Justice for this Man!”

“This is the saddest story I have heard in all my fifteen years in Ireland. it is sad because it predicts the future and yet no-one cares because you are asleep. You Irish have made for yourself a bed of nails through your gutlessness and apathy. And let hell skelp it into ye.”

“His estranged family will have no luck for this. Denying water and shelter to someone is not part of our culture. What goes around comes around I’ve seen it happen before, maybe not this generation but the next. A curse on them.”

“Irish law society closed ranks apparently facilitating the denying of justice to an elderly farmer.”

“Hi Mike I have just read the whole story from beginning to end an utter disgrace very sad totally injust . can’t find the share button. I do hope that things will go right for him. The expense so far is unreal”

“What else should be expected in Ireland today. The real issue is too many have the attitude of  I’m all right jack so f*** you”

“Cases like this one rely on secrecy, sharing on social media may deter future fraud occurring within families regarding the beneficiaries of a will, it’s far too common.”

“As an Irish American dealing with a case with similarities there is no justice in this country for seniors…it should be reported in the media in the states. I will be doing so, have Sean Hannity get involved on Fox news he hates injustice!!”

“the mob in the legal world have no honour, respect or fairness its all about ..money”

“its a disgrace what has being done to this man and its theft ,,, so robert marren should be charged with theft , and its shame on tony mclynn solicitors for taking this case and for their huge fees they charged which is also theft, corruption at its best under the law”

“The Lawless Society are hell bent on benefitting themselves through legalised theft. Hiding themselves behind the Law and corrupting it, yet they cannot be tried for their crimes, because they run the courts.”

Posted in Book Launch, News Tagged with:

Mike Gavin’s e-book Exposing Shocking Solicitors Financial Elder Abuse Greed & Corruption

Paperback on Amazon https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/153932401X

84 Year Old Man Defrauded And Threatened By Irish Lawyers – Solicitors!!!
– Are You Disgusted?
To commit fraud is an offense in Ireland. But the prosecution for such will depend very much on where you reside on the social scale
The Law Society of Ireland closed ranks on Elderly Michael Gavin, threatened to block his emails and suggested that the administrator had carried out his clients (the other beneficiaries) clear instructions.


Mr. Robert Marren Solicitor the administrator refused to award Michael Gavin the grant money’s paid down from the Dept. of Agriculture. Michael is owed over €116,000 for 9 years minding the farm Animals.
“As Administrator, it fell to me to make a decision how to treat the proceeds of sale of livestock. I decided to split this between the Estate and your good self. However, I did not consider your claim for maintaining livestock to be justified,”

Mr. Robert Marren Solicitor held onto the funds from the land sale for nearly 2 years, and then finally awarded to Michael Gavin and his sister €12,500 plus interest less than what we were each entitled to.

A reliable source revealed that the local Politician Willie Penrose TD BL was not paid for his opinion, however the estate was charged for same, and no invoice was provided for Willie Penrose.

Mr. Robert Marren Solicitor Squandered the estate assets and hired an additional accountant at a cost of €8,751.45.

He did not seek approval for damien hannigan & Company Limited Chartered Accountant, Mullingar. Why was his own personal accountant hired to oversee the accounts of Catherine O’Conner the family accountant? Marren failed to provide the correct invoice for Catherine O’Conner. Her invoice stated total amount due €584.25 while Cash Account dated 18th July, 2014 “Fees paid to Catherine O’ Connor €6,857.25.

Mr. Marren did not provide a “detailed bill of costs” for his fee of €40,892.53 he awarded to himself. Although the not fit for purpose Law Society of Ireland publishes a leaflet on solicitors’ charges stating that By law, solicitors are obliged to furnish information about their costs in writing, it would appear that rob marren is consider to be above this “BY LAW”

Despite Michael Gavins written instructions
“If a fair allowance is not made on an agreed basis, I will not give my consent to any distribution account prepared by you. Similarly, my sisters will also have to agree before a distribution account can be finalised and a distribution effected. Accordingly you as Administrator will be unable to distribute the estate unless you can procure agreement between us and, if this agreement is not forthcoming, I am advised the only way you, as Administrator, can be protected is to go back into Court and get a Court Order directing how the estate can be distributed.”
marren bulldozed ahead and distributed the estate.

No bill of costs was provided for T & N McLynn Solicitors, Athlone, paid an amount of €38,941 a year prior to closing. They brought Mike to the High Court 3 days attempting to sell the roof over his head.

Tony Henry, Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone failed to undertake the instructions given him through John Glynn Solicitors to prevent Mr. Robert Marren closing in isolation to well founded objections.

It would appear rob marren allowed confusion to arise in relation to the exact disbursement of funds and showed a complete disregard for the interests of the beneficiaries, rob marren knew to be ELDERLY, and by his conduct is depriving two of the ELDERLY beneficiaries, of the enjoyment of their share in the estate. Marren also forced Michael Gavin and his sister Eileen Linney to incur additional unnecessary expenses in drafting documents and letters time and time again to prove their claim.
https://youtu.be/pLSycEaJX8I

Paperback on Amazon https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/153932401X

Please Support Michael Gavin Elderly 83 Year Old Irish Farmer by Signing Petition

Michael Gavins Petition

  

Petition of Michael Gavin fighting to receive compensation from Solicitor

[your signature]

Share this with your friends:

   

 

Posted in News

ACT Anti Corruption Taskforce

Anti Corruption Taskforce

Anti Corruption Taskforce ACT

Next Meeting Prince of Wales Hotel Athlone  Saturday August 13th 4pm to 6pm bring a friend!

Have you, your family your friends been the victim of corruption and injustice?
Have your family or your friends been the victim of crime, suicide, bulling, police misconduct, legal system corruption depriving one of justice, wage cuts to bail out rich bankers and speculators, bribing and corruption of politicians to gain advantage, family eviction, threats of evictions, homelessness, banking frauds, anti business austerity policies, bankruptcies political lies, deceit and frauds,

long waits for elderly and sick on hospital trolleys, cuts to essential disability services,
prejudices and discrimination, chronic illness or disability, job loss, bitter family break ups and divorces, UnConstitutional new taxes, charges and levies to seize your income/property to bail out bankers and speculators, massive public debt which will burden and hurt your children and grandchildren.

Corruption and injustice in this country destroys people like you, your wife your husband, your partner, your children, your family, your mother, your father, your brother, your sister, your uncles, your aunts, your nephews, your nieces, your neighbourhoods and communities, your country.

On Saturday July 23rd we formed this group called Anti  Corruption  Taskkforce (A.C.T)

This is a group which will campaign for many things such as cameras in court,

No less than 3 judges presiding in a court,

Impeachment of corrupt judges ,

Removal of corrupt people from public office , .

You get the picture!

We are however a direct action group also that will follow to the ends of the earth corrupt individuals and will make their work follow them home to their families and neighbours .

No more will we be the victims .

Next Meeting Prince of Wales Hotel Athlone  Saturday August 13th 4pm to 6pm bring a friend!

(with weekly meetings thereafter)

If you want to be part of the team which will make history in bringing down corruption in Ireland we suggest you be there.

We will win and we will save our country.

People power will rule . Be there .

No matter who you are Corruption affects You in some form or another.

It’s the common denominator for all that’s Wrong with society today in Ireland.

Whether it’s Suicide, Evictions, Homelessness, Emigration, Broken families, Drugs, Mental breakdowns, Government, Gardaí. Legal, judicial and in so many other areas,

We are all Victims.

Posted in News Tagged with:

Why is Fianna Fail Head Office Unsure of Robert Troy TD?

Robert Troy 

 

Robert Troy TD

Can enigmatic Fianna Fail TD Robert Troy live up to head-office expectations and bring in a second seat in the Longford-Westmeath constituency, a critical part of the party’s programme of winning back its old pre-eminence in Irish politics – and vital for Troy’s own ministerial ambitions?

#Longford #Westmeath was once a bastion of FF, with the party comfortably scoring two and sometimes three out of four seats with support in the high 40s, and a stunning 58% in 1987.

But the party’s debacle in 2011 saw support drop to a paltry 19% and they scraped just one seat out of four, with Troy elected without reaching the quota and barely keeping Fine Gael from three seats.What was really interesting about 2011 was that both the then FF incumbents, former cabinet minister Mary O’Rourke and Longford’s Peter Kelly, lost their seats as what was left of FF support looked for new faces unmarred by connection to the bad old ways.

Troy had been an adviser to O’Rourke’s great rival Donie Cassidy in 2005-2007, but his selection as a candidate was expected to just add a few votes to the FF pile.Winning the seat was a great surprise.

Troy may be young (35) but he is not one of the new breed of bright young things. He is old-style FF, in family and personal terms. His family has run the post office in Ballynacargy outside Mullingar for generations, while Troy went to Dublin when he left school, working for MB.

He came back in 2004 to take over the small family business, and won a seat on Westmeath council that year. It was there that he showed what he was made of Working closely with Donie Cassidy, he established himself locally and, in the 2009 local elections, more than doubled his previous tally, getting the largest vote of any councillor in Westmeath.

As Cassidy’s protégé, his success was a warning to Athlone-based O’Rourke, as he went on to get a general election nomination two years later: the strong local base he had built up enabled him to out poll O’Rourke and Kelly and take the seat —just.

As a new face, untainted by the murky past, head office was keen to push Troy forward to speak for the party, as he declared the party had to return to its radical roots.

This was closely aligned to what new party leader MIcheál Martin was saying and was also in tune with grassroots feeling among party supporters in the constituency.

Attempts to link him with dubious practices have been made, but without much success. In May 2013, the Irish Independent reported that gardai had failed to serve three summonses for relatively minor motoring offences on him and, as a result, the charges were dismissed.

No explanation was ever forthcoming and Troy clarified that he had no idea why the summonses weren’t served.

In any case, the party’s support for Troy reaped its benefit in the 2016 election. He topped the poll and was elected on the first count. He may not have been a high flyer, but he was producing electoral success.

Crucially, this success did not lift the party as a whole. Troy’s running 2016 mate, Connie Gerety-Quinn, whose nomination Robert Troy was forced through by head office to meet gender quota requirements despite strong local opposition, made very little impact even though Troy ceded campaigning rights in Longford entirely to her.

One astonishing aspect of this election was that all four elected were from Westmeath, with no representation from Longford. More than that, three of the four TDs are from the Mullingar area, with Troy and Labour’s veteran Willie Penrose both from the tiny village of Ballynacargy. It is likely that at least one of them will lose a seat, with Penrose looking to be the weakest.

But how crucial will Troy’s role be in securing the second seat? FF has nominated Joe Flaherty, a director of the Longford Leader newspaper, as their candidate. He romped home at the local convention with two-thirds of the delegates’ votes, completely eclipsing Gerety-Quinn and sending a dismissive message to head office in the process.

Longford will not be without representation for long, but head office is beginning to be unsure of Troy. Long regarded as a strong supporter of Martin, the idea is dawning that perhaps he is only a strong supporter of himself.

For, example, his answer to a question about a possible coalition with Sinn Féin was vintage FF politics. He declared that the party leader had made the party’s position “absolutely clear” before going welcoming the openness and maturity of Gerry Adams’s new approach to the question.

With Troy standing firmly on both sides of the fence, and with the Long ford nominee also a dubious quantity in respect of the party leader, head office is decidedly unsure about the party machine there.

Troy’s caution in respect of SF is quite logical. Paul Hogan, who stood for the party before he quit in a row about supposed lack of his head office support, only missed out on snatching the last seat from Labour’s Willie Penrose by a few hundred votes.

With Hogan now outside SF, it seems unlikely that either he or the party will be in contention again, but Robert Troy certainly doesn’t want to antagonise a significant element of the electorate just as Longford gets its act together and as Westmeath faces the certainty of losing one or two seats.

This leaves a question mark over Troy’s ministerial ambitions. Opinion polls indicate that Martin’s strategy will fail to put FF in the driving seat and, if a coalition with SF becomes the only option, then a new leader – especially one from Mayo (Dara Calleary) with a keen interest in rural Ireland – is likely to be better disposed.

Robert Troy hasn’t exactly shone in policy areas, as spokesperson first for arts and culture, then for children’s affairs and currentlyfor transport and tourism. Here, though, he has remained closer to the official line, denouncing SF’s budget proposals as potentially devastating for Irish tourism.

Neither has he been slow to court Ryanair boss and fellow Mullingar resident Michael O’Leary, declaring that he would listen more to O’Leary than to transport minister Shane Ross. He provided the controversial businessman with a platform – at a local fundraising breakfast – to further his attacks on RTE and public enterprise in return for limited financial backing from a man normally associated with Fine Gael.

Robert Troy, though, is not without some strong qualities. His courage and genuineness in openly discussing his problems with depression have won him widespread approval and revealed a man who has his own ideas and values, as well as an ability to read the political rules to his advantage.

THE PHOENIX OCTOBER 6, 2017 

Posted in News Tagged with:

GRECO Report finds Ireland ‘unsatisfactory’ in judicial independence

greco

GRECO Find Only three out of 11 anti-corruption recommendations met

A European anti-corruption body has found Ireland to be “globally unsatisfactory”, particularly in the areas of judicial appointments and independence.

The report by the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO), a Council of Europe body, will put further pressure on the Government to pass the Judicial Appointments Bill being debated by the Dáil.

Taoiseach Leo Varadkar has attempted to fast-track the Bill in the wake of the controversy surrounding the appointment of former attorney general Máire Whelan to the Court of Appeal. The appointment led to accusations of cronyism when it emerged that Ms Whelan did not go through the official application process and was appointed during a Cabinet meeting at which she was present.

However it is not clear if the Bill will pass before the summer recess despite the Dáil sitting for an extra week to debate it.

The Judicial Appointments Bill, which is being championed by Minister for Transport Shane Ross, would establish a new commission to appoint judges. It would have a lay majority and a lay chairperson. A separate Bill will provide for a judicial council to deal with the education and conduct of judges.

Unfortunate time

The group’s report comes at an unfortunate time for the Government which faces increased opposition from the judiciary to its appointments Bill. Senior judges, including the Chief Justice, have made a series of criticisms of the Bill in recent weeks including that it is rushed and “ill-conceived”.

The report found Ireland fully complied with just three out of eleven recommendations made by the Group in 2014.

Minister for Justice Charlie Flanagan called it “obviously disappointing”.

“While much work is underway in relation to all of the recommendations, we fell short of achieving a good report as the legislation in train is hugely complex.”

In 2014 GRECO recommended that the current system for judicial appointments, promotions and transfers be reformed to ensure the most suitable candidates are selected “in a transparent way, with proper influence from the executive/political powers.”

The Government told the group that the legislation was pending. However the group said that it has seen not details or draft texts of the Bill and therefore had to conclude that its recommendation was not complied with.

It said the Government should “pursue their reform efforts in close consultation with the judiciary to the extent feasible.”

GRECO said Ireland was also not in compliance with its recommendation that a structure be established to deal with judges’ pay in a way that would safeguard the “integrity and professional quality” of the bench.

Rejected

The group rejected the Government’s response that the new Public Service Pay Commission would deal with these issues. It said it could not see how the commission would protect judges’ independence when it came to setting their pay and pension conditions.

It also noted that there is no formal code of conduct for Irish judges. Work to establish a code of conduct was started in 2011 by the then government but has yet to be completed, the group noted.

“Moreover, in the current situation, including the fact that a judicial council has not yet been established, there is no accountability mechanism in place,” it added.

Earlier this week another European report found that nearly a third of Irish judges believed judges were appointment by government for reasons other than merit. The European Network of Councils for the Judiciary, which canvassed 60 of Ireland’s 168 judges, also found 25 per cent feel changes to their pensions and pay in recent years have had an effect on their independence as judges

The Irish Times

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/report-finds-ireland-unsatisfactory-in-judicial-independence-1.3138160

Posted in News Tagged with: ,

High Court Caught Charles Flanagan TD in Cahoots with HSE Bullies

Charles Flanagan TD

Charles Flanagan TD

Woman settles professional negligence case against Charles Flanagan TD

A WOMAN who sued her former solicitor – now government  Charles Flanagan TD – for alleged professional negligence has settled her High Court action.

Mary Rigney Murray brought the case over the 2003 handling by Mr Flanagan and his firm Bolger White Egan & Flanagan Solicitors of an action against her employers, the HSE.

In her claim for negligence and breach of contract she alleged her legal representatives failed to prosecute her claim within the required time limits and allowed it to become statue barred.

She also alleged Mr Flanagan, without her consent, had entered into talks aimed at halting her action with the HSE

 

All her allegations were denied. Both Mr Flanagan and his firm rejected claims of negligence and breach of contract and argued that Ms Rigney Murray was not entitled to damages.

 

Today, the President of the High Court Mr Justice Nicholas Kearns was told the action had been resolved. No details were revealed in open court.

 

Speaking afterwards, Ms Rigney Murray’s solicitor Caoimhe Haughey said the agreement between the parties was confidential.

 

The action, had it proceeded, was expected to last for a number of days.

 

Mr Flanagan (aged 56), who is a partner in the firm, is the current chair of the Fine Gael Parliamentary Party. He has served as TD for Laois Offaly from 1987 to 2002, when he lost his seat. He was re-elected to the Dail in the 2007 and 2011 elections.

 

In her action Ms Rigney Murray, of Lenamore, Clonfert, Ballinasloe, Co Galway alleged that in October 2003 she retained the defendants for an action against her employers the HSE.

 

She wanted to sue the HSE because she claimed that between June 2002 and September/October 2002 she was subjected to bullying harassment and intimidation at her workplace which resulted in her sustained personal injuries, loss, damage and expense.

 

However she claimed that Mr Flanagan and the firm failed to prosecute her claim expeditiously and had delayed unreasonably and without just cause in instituting proceedings.

 

She also claimed Mr Flanagan and the firm failed to act on her instructions, failed to warn her that her claim was expiring and at risk of being debarred by the courts.

 

She further alleged that in April 2006 Mr Flanagan met with a senior official with the HSE and lawyers representing that body.

 

She claimed Mr Flanagan falsely misrepresented her position to those other parties, and entered into discussions with a view to discontinuing her action against the HSE. 

 

She also claimed that Mr Flanagan attended that meeting without her authority and was acting without her instructions.

 

Mr Charles Flanagan TD and the solicitors firm, of Lismard Court, Fintan Lawlor Avenue, Portlaoise denied ALL the claims of negligence and breach of contract against them.

 

They denied that Ms Rigney Murray had been deprived of her the opportunity to prosecute her claim against the HSE.

 

Mr Charles Flanagan TD met with the HSE in April 2006. During that meeting, and at all other times, Mr Flanagan said he and his firm had acted with Ms Rigney Murray’s full knowledge and authority. He denied that he misrepresented her claim or entering into any discussions aimed at discontinuing her action against the HSE.  

Aodhan O’Faolain Independent Online

Posted in News Tagged with:

Why does Willie Penrose TD Labour Party Support Solicitor Financial Elder Abuse?

Willie Penrose TD

Willie Penrose TD

For the Attention of

Willie Penrose TD 044 9343987

Cathy Whelehan  085 7415987 #Rochfortbridge #Kilbeggan

Geraldine Mills 087 0933332 #Athlone

Lorraine Scally 087 78261496  #Mullingar 

Willie Penrose TD BL who authorised your associate Mr. Robert B. Marren, Castle Street, Mullingar to seek your opinion William Penrose B.L .  Despite our numerous written requests No Invoice for you William Penrose B.L. or explanation of why your opinion was sought.

Did you Willie Penrose TD BL get paid and what for?

The Estate of Patrick Gavin Dundonnell Taughmaconnell Co. Roscommon was charged €1,230 for Willie Penrose’s opinion but no invoice was provided despite repeated persistent written requests.

We were informed that YOU Willie Penrose TD BL have refused to the investigating Garda a statement in relation to this matter.

Why have you Willie Penrose refused to respond or make a statement to the Garda Fraud Squad when questioned. 

You Willie Penrose are NOT FIT for purpose and we will pursue you vigorously until this matter is resolved.

Willie Penrose we demand answers to the following Questions

Question 1

Re Folio RN36155F the old historical home where I Michael Gavin was born and reared.

Willie Penrose TD BL who authorised your associate Mr. Robert B Marren to register himself as full owner?

Who authorised  Mr. Robert B Marren to make application to Roscommon Land Registration Authority for applicants 

Ann Sanford Wellesley Massachusetts, USA

Kathleen O’Keeffe Glanmire, Cork, 

Eileen Linney, Michael Gavin, 

 Philomena Duffy Davitt College Castlebar

Kathryn Kelly (Duffy) Portiuncula hospital 

Noel Duffy, Patrick Duffy, 

Michael J. Harte Wellesley Massachusetts, USA

Michelle Harte, Brenda Waters, Quincy, Massachusettsas owners of Folio RN36155F.

I was not required to complete FORM 36 for the above registration. WHY?

Question 2

Re Folio 9544F the home where I currently reside.

Willie Penrose TD BL why is your associate Robert B Marren Solicitor Mullingar coercing me again to engage a solicitor at my expense to complete FORM 36.

Willie Penrose TD BL Why has it taken until now for your associate Mr. Robert B. Marren to deal with this vexatious issue bearing in mind that my brother Pat Gavin died in October 2005 over 12 years ago.

Willie Penrose TD BL will I still be entitled to reside in my home as per my fathers will?

Question 3

Willie Penrose TD BL who authorised your associate Mr. Robert B. Marren to favour the wishes of my 2 devious and spiteful sisters Ann Sanford and Kathleen O’Keefe. 

According to Tony Watson of the Law Society of Ireland your associate Mr. Robert B. Marren followed their clear instructions. What about my valid objections Willie Penrose TD BL?

Question 4

Willie Penrose TD BL who authorised your associate Mr. Robert B. Marren to distribute the estate assets speedily over the Christmas period 2014 in the knowledge that myself and my sister Eileen Linney were actively attempting to retain a solicitor (Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone) to act on our behalf to prevent you closing. 

Why didn’t you do the right thing and take the case back before a judge as I instructed you to do.

Question 5

Willie Penrose TD BL who authorised your associate Mr. Robert B. Marren to Delay making the decision regarding my share in the farming profits and rightful share of the grant monies received from the Department of Agriculture until the very end with the draft distribution account that contained countless errors on 18th September, 2014?

Question 6

Willie Penrose TD BL who authorised your associate Mr. Robert B. Marren, Solicitor, Mullingar to make a decision in March 2013 to accept my claim to owning half the livestock and all the sheep?

But yet for no logical reason you refused to award me the net amount €116,789.11 due to me out of the Single Payment Entitlements representing my ½ share in the profits from farming the lands, which was also sent to your associate Mr. Robert Marren, Solicitor, Mullingar on the 5th of December, 2015 for your consideration.

Question 7

Willie Penrose TD BL who authorised your associate Mr. Robert B. Marren to award me Elderly Michael Gavin and my widowed sister €12,500 plus interest less than what we were entitled to? Who authorised him to hold on to the funds from the land sale for nearly 2 years for no good reason?

Question 8

Willie Penrose TD BL who authorised your associate Mr. Robert B. Marren NOT to provide a detailed bill of costs as requested numerous times?

Question 9

Willie Penrose TD BL who authorised your associate Mr. Robert B. Marren to hire his own personal accountant Damien Hannigan & Company Limited Chartered Accountant, Mullingar. Why was he hired against the explicate wishes of Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney to oversee the accounts of Catherine O’Conner?

Damien Hannigan charged an excessive fee of €8,751.45 which is considered to be extremely expensive and an unnecessary expense. Although he was hired to oversee the accounts his fee is in excess of Catherine O’Conner’s fee.

Why does your associate Robert B. Marren refused to provide the correct invoice for Catherine O’Conner. Her invoice states Total Amount Due €584.25 while Cash Account dated 18th July, 2014 “Fees paid to Catherine O’ Connor €6,857.25.”

Question 10

Willie Penrose TD BL who authorised your associate Mr. Robert B. Marren to seek your opinion William Penrose B.L ?  Despite our numerous written requests to both your and ROBBER Marren No Invoice for you William Penrose B.L. or explanation of why your opinion was sought.

Did Marren pay you Willie Penrose and what for?

The Estate was charged €1,230 for your opinion Willie Penrose but no invoice was provided despite repeated persistent written requests.

We were informed that you Willie Penrose TD BL have refused the investigating Garda a statement in relation to this matter.

 

Here is a link to file that was sent to DPP https://goo.gl/ryaqsf

 

The Law is as Straight as a Door Jamb,It’s those that implements the Law that’s CROOKED

Have a Nice Day

Michael Gavin

https://twitter.com/MichaelGavin83

https://www.facebook.com/michaelgavin83/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCe7ZmEXJVgkpLwfsOD9G9Sw

http://mikegavin83.com

Buy Financial Elder Abuse Book Amazon UK goo.gl/vbnCqF

Buy Financial Elder Abuse Book Amazon USA goo.gl/Mg6jDh

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with: ,

THE NEW NAZIS ARE NOT RIGHT WING, BUT ARE LEFT WING, LIBERAL AND VERY INTOLERANT

Censorship
Censorship is back with a bang in Ireland and is now a fact of every day life.
Those social justice warriors who consider themselves anti fascist, are in fact using fascist and nazi tactics to silence opinions not to their liking.
This phenomenon is taking hold in Western society and it is being championed by the political, media and celebrity establishment.
The elites in other-words.
Four Irish journalists have been fired or pushed into oblivion in the past 4 years. Gemma O’ Doherty was fired by Independent Newspapers because she informed the nation that a Garda Commissioner had penalty points wiped.
John Waters packed it in at The Irish Times and finally at Independent Newspapers because he had enough of political correctness in the editorial rooms and in the corridors of so called freedom of thought.
Kevin Myers and George Hook were recently fired by The Sunday Times and Newstalk respectfully because they caused offence to some people.
We are now not allowed voice an opinion about anything, if that opinion does not fit in neatly with a politically correct left wing and liberal narrative.
If one dares to question or query that narrative they will be ruthlessly silenced and in the case of journalists or broadcasters, their careers and livelyhoods destroyed.
This censorship has now finally arrived at social media where youtube, twitter and facebook have upped the ante in censoring opinions complained about by social justice warriors and intolerant cry bullies.
Western society will regret allowing this war on freedom of expression to continue. But by then it will be too late because there will be free speakers languishing in prisons for expressing their opinions.
Nazi Germany and Soviet Block immediately spring to mind. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with:

HOMELESSNESS

HOMELESSNESS

HOMELESSNESS

The people must now take the situation into their own hands because the political landlord class will not.

Last Christmas one of the boldest acts of civil disobedience in the history of this state occurred with the peoples take over of the vacant building Apolllo House in Dublin in order to provide shelter for the city’s homeless.

The Real Irish Media does not know the circumstances surrounding the decision to vacate Apollo House in January, but it was with disappointment that we saw the occupiers not remaining steadfast until every person sleeping in the city’s doorways was given somewhere to call home.

But like we say, we are unaware of the circumstances surrounding the decision to vacate the property at the time.

However, we are aware that there may be plans afoot in Dublin by other homelessness activists to take possession of state controlled vacant buildings and provide shelter for those who otherwise will be left to die of hypothermia on the city’s streets this winter.

And just like with the Apollo House occupation last Christmas, The Real Irish Media will support such an action 100% without fear or favour. The latest spin which is emanating from the government regarding homelessness is a return to bedsits.

This is a retrograde step back to the 1980s and it is nothing more than a rogue landlord’s charter. Greedy Fine Gael and Fianna Fail voting landlords will have no hesitation in cramming people into tiny hovels and the result will be a return to the tenement era. The political establishment does not care about homelessness.

There are no votes in it. Their friends in the media only pay token lip service to the matter so there is no danger of anyone in power being held to account by the media on the homelessness issue.

At this stage, only the building of social housing and the release of existing homes that are under Nama control will solve the homelessness problem.

The problem will not be solved by the private sector and the political establishment know that perfectly well.

The political establishment (which basically is any political party to have been in government or in support of government in the past 25 years) is in cahoots with it’s developer and builder friends in order to get the best deal for such people.

That is the way it always was and always will be until a revolution of sorts abolishes said political establishment.

Nothing is going to change in this country regarding housing policy so there is no alternative but for homeless people and their supporters to take the law into their own hands and take possession of some of the vacant properties that are lying idle awaiting the forthcoming boom in property prices. Marching on Dublin’s streets at the weekend and posing for photos for one’s facebook page has already failed.

Commenting with outrage on the Journal’s and Irish Times’s facebook pages when someone is found dead in a doorway has already failed. Standing outside Leinster House with a placard and thick looking face has failed spectacularly.

The political establishment and their developer, builder and MEDIA friends just do not give a damn.

It is time for the people to do it for themselves and judging by the good will from the general public and city center business community relating to Apollo House last Christmas, it is to be hoped that such occupations will be successful and more permanent next time.

The Real Irish Media – Can you handle the truth?
Posted in The Real Irish Media - Can you handle the truth? Tagged with:

GEORGE HOOK MAY HAVE SIGNED HIS OWN P45 BY APOLOGISING TO FASCIST PC BULLIES

GEORGE HOOK

GEORGE HOOK MAY HAVE SIGNED HIS OWN P45 BY APOLOGISING TO FASCIST PC BULLIES

A few months ago, Kevin Myers apologised for something he wrote in the Sunday Times which caused offense to a few fascist PC bullies. His apology did not stop his dismissal and his apology still did not satisfy the baying lynch mob who consider themselves to be tolerant liberals, socialists and social justice warriors. 

This week, George Hook, apologised for something he said on radio last week. His apology still does not satisfy the baying lynch mob who consider themselves to be tolerant liberals, socialists and social justice warriors. They want him sacked. Some of these tolerant individuals on social media actually want him dead.

George Hook’s verbal apology on live radio was cringe worthy stuff. He grovelled and begged with such self loathing at the feet of fascist political correctness, that it was reminiscent of what we would have seen in an old Hollywood movie, where the condemned man begged at the feet of the Roman Emperor for mercy so as not to be thrown to the lions and eaten alive.

So who are these tolerant people who want the tongues and fingers amputated from the bodies (preferably dead bodies) of Kevin Myers and George Hook? They are members of the National Union Of Journalists (NUJ), who generally write, say and think what they are ordered to write, say and think. They are the Quango and Charity CEOs who earn 6 figure annual salaries.

They are the bleeding hearted politicians (the liars at election time) who earn 3,000 Euros plus per week. They are the general socially conditioned masses whose brains are contaminated by the current affairs content of TV3, RTE, The Irish Times and Dennis O’ Brien’s mass media empire. In other words they are the IRISH ESTABLISHMENT ELITES who are demanding George Hook’s head on a plate, just because he expressed an opinion on a serious topic.

It does not matter what George Hook said or how he said it. He gave an opinion, which to the ears of many ordinary people, was more like advice than an opinion. Some people interpreted his comments as placing blame on rape victims for being raped. But it is the latter who have been given a media platform without question to the exclusion of the opinions of the former.

Free speech is now a thing of the past, not just in Ireland but in the Western World. The people who are presently in overdrive to rid society of free speech are the same type of people who successfully banned free speech in the past i.e. the Nazis, the Soviets, the Eastern Block, the military dictatorships of Latin America in the 1970s and 1980s and The Phillipines under Ferdinand Marcos to list but a few.

And let us not forget present day China, North Korea and the West’s favourite country Saudi Arabia where free speech is also not tolerated. Left wing politicians and commentators, social justice warriors and tolerant liberals sure have strange bedfellows and allies.

The Real Irish Media – Can you handle the truth?

Posted in The Real Irish Media - Can you handle the truth?

SACKING OF NORIN O’ SULLIVAN

Norin O' Sullivan

Norin O' Sullivan

FORGET THE SACKING OF NORIN O’ SULLIVAN, HER PAY OFF OR HER PENSION

An Garda Siochana must be disbanded NOW! Just like Martin Callinan before her, Norin O’ Sullivan was removed as Garda Commissioner. And just like Callinan, her removal was a sacking in all but name. But unlike a normal sacking, both were sacked with all the entitlements of a mutually planned retirement.

The political and media establishment’s description of this type of public service sacking is ‘retired with immediate effect’, while the true description is ‘sacked with generous benefits to limit the damage they caused’. Noreen O’ Sullivan’s replacement will be more of the same, just like her own appointment in 2014.

That appointment was greeted with celebration by Ireland’s media, with RTE bringing on security analyst and ex soldier Declan Power to tell the nation and we quote “Norin O’ Sullivan will be a safe pair of hands”.

But as is now evident, she was not up to the job. In fact there is not one member of the Gardai up to the job, because the whole organisation that is An Garda Siochana is rotten, corrupt and CRIMINAL, from the very top down to the sprogs who exit Templemore, fully trained in the art of committing perjury as part of their duty.

The political and media establishment today are collectively calling for ‘GARDA REFORM‘. How many more times as a society, must we have to listen to this ‘REFORM’ buzzword as it pertains to police criminality in Ireland?

What these idiots mean by ‘REFORM’ is yet another tribunal, more enquiries and a little piece of useless legislation which changes absolutely nothing. There have been calls for appointing a Commissioner from outside of the state.

But that in itself will not be enough to clean up a police force which has been one of the most corrupt in Western Europe for the past 60 years. The whole top brass in the Phoenix Park, all 20 to 30 of them, must be sacked now, even if that means paying them off Callinan and O’ Sullivan style to finally get rid of them.

They must be replaced with personell from outside of the state. Such replacements do not all need to be senior trained police officers either. Some of them could be criminologists and forensic experts, in addition to experienced police officers.

But NONE of them should be members of An Garda Siochana and NONE of them should be selected from Ireland’s corrupt Civil Service or from ANYWHERE in Irish Society. This will, in effect, be the same as disbanding the force.

A new name would also be required because, while the origins behind the naming of our police force was a very noble one, that name has now been tarnished beyond repair by criminals in uniform. Also a new Act of the Oireachtas would need to be passed swiftly to ensure that any wrongdoing by any officer of any rank in the new police force would automatically result in a mandatory suspension, pending the outcome of a mandatory prosecution.

The Policing Authority must be given full responsibility for hiring and promoting senior officers and the Authority must be staffed with a generous quota of lay people selected in the same manner as jury service.

There should be no direct political input into such a process. This would ensure at least some impartiality in the process of selecting future Commissioners and senior police management. Anything less than measures of this magnitude will only prolong the present rot which is tarnishing Ireland’s image internationally. But alas the political will is not there because such measures would only result in the political establishment losing its total control over policing.

 

Certainly a muppet such as Justice Minister Charlie Flanagan would not wish for such a fair and transparent police force. He and his ilk have spent their lives in denial that Ireland has, for a number of decades, a police force which is not unlike the police force with existed in Apartheid South Africa or Pinochet’s Chile.

The Real Irish Media – Can you handle the truth? 

 

Posted in The Real Irish Media - Can you handle the truth? Tagged with: ,

Exposing Gormanston College Past Student for Solicitor Financial Elder Abuse

gormanston college
I hereby inform you at Gormanston College that I 85 Year Old Michael Gavin am a victim of Financial Elder Abuse at the hands of one of your past students Robert Marren Solicitor Castle Street Mullingar.
 
Robert B Marren deprived me the right to have my well-founded objections brought before a Judge. Marren confiscated over €116,000 Department of Agriculture grants, so I was tricked into working for nothing for over 9 years minding farm animals. 
 
My widowed sister and I were also shorted €12,500 plus interest from the sale of the lands at auction, not to mention money that was deducted from my sister for cattle she never owned any cattle in her life.
 
Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone did not undertaken the written and verbal instructions given him though another solicitor to take proceedings against Marren and make him go before a Judge to address my valid objections instead of playing GOD in the matter.
 
Tony Watson Law Society of Ireland would not reprimanded Marren and Henry. Instead Watson threatened to block my email correspondence when I questioned whether Willie Penrose TD was paid for his opinion. No invoice to date has being provided for Penrose although the estate of my late Brother was charged. I very much doubt Penrose had much if anything to say for himself to the trained fraud investigator who questioned him.
 
 Peter D. Jones Westmeath State Solicitor (minus his penalty points) has not responded to the correspondence on behalf of his client Robert B Marren. Jones threatened me not to peaceful protest outside his client Marren’s office. Coincidentally the Garda Fraud squad missed getting me home the first time they called unannounced as I was already on the road to peaceful assembly protest outside Marren and Jones offices in Mullingar.
 
 Linda Kirwan Solicitor from the Society of Ireland will not fit her purpose and reprimanded Penalty Points Jones State Solicitor for failing to answer the 20 questions I posed to him in regard to his client Robert B Marren’s administration of my late brother’s estate. Kirwan although she did send literature stating that by law a solicitor must provide a bill of costs to his client, she fails to enforce this law.
 
The Law is as Straight as a Door Jamb,It’s those that implements the Law that’s CROOKED
 
Have a Nice Day
 
Michael Gavin
 
 
 
Buy Financial Elder Abuse Book Amazon UK goo.gl/vbnCqF
Posted in News, Solicitors Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Who Authorize Solicitors Lawyers to Rob me and my way of Life

Solicitors Lawyers

Solicitors Lawyers

We have a number of questions for you.

Question 1

Re Folio RN36155F the old historical home where I was born and reared.

Who authorised you Mr. Robert B Marren to register yourself as full owner?

Who authorised you Mr. Robert B Marren to make application to Roscommon Land Registration Authority for applicants 

Ann Sanford Wellesley Massachusetts, USA

Kathleen O’Keeffe Glanmire, Cork, 

Eileen Linney, Michael Gavin, 

 Philomena Duffy Davitt College Castlebar

Kathryn Kelly (Duffy) Portiuncula hospital 

Noel Duffy, Patrick Duffy, 

Michael J. Harte Wellesley Massachusetts, USA

Michelle Harte, Brenda Waters, Quincy, Massachusettsas owners of Folio RN36155F.

I was not required to complete FORM 36 for the above registration. WHY?

 

Question 2

Re Folio 9544F the home where I currently reside.

Why are you a coercing me again to engage a solicitor at my expense to complete FORM 36.

Why has it taken until now for you Mr. Robert B. Marren to deal with this vexatious issue bearing in mind that my brother Pat Gavin died in October 2005 over 12 years ago.

Will I still be entitled to reside in my home as per my fathers will?

 

Question 3

Who authorised you Mr. Robert B. Marren to favour the wishes of my 2 devious and spiteful sisters Ann Sanford and Kathleen O’Keefe. 

According to Tony Watson of the Law Society of Ireland you followed their clear instructions. What about my valid objections Marren?

 

Question 4

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren to distribute the estate assets speedily over the Christmas period 2014 in the knowledge that myself and my sister Eileen Linney were actively attempting to retain a solicitor (Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone) to act on our behalf to prevent you closing. 

Why didn’t you do the right thing and take the case back before a judge as I instructed you to do.

 

Question 5

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren to Delay making the decision regarding my share in the farming profits and rightful share of the grant monies received from the Department of Agriculture until the very end with the draft distribution account that contained countless errors on 18th September, 2014?

 

Question 6

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren, Solicitor, Mullingar to make a decision in March 2013 to accept my claim to owning half the livestock and all the sheep?

But yet for no logical reason you refused to award me the net amount €116,789.11 due to me out of the Single Payment Entitlements representing my ½ share in the profits from farming the lands, which was also sent to you Mr. Robert Marren, Solicitor, Mullingar on the 5th of December, 2015 for your consideration.

 

Question 7

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren to award me Elderly Michael Gavin and my widowed sister €12,500 plus interest less than what we were entitled to? Who authorised you to hold on to the funds from the land sale for nearly 2 years for no good reason?

 

Question 8

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren NOT to provide your detailed bill of costs as requested numerous times?

 

Question 9

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren to hire your own personal accountant Damien Hannigan & Company Limited Chartered Accountant, Mullingar. Why was he hired against the explicate wishes of Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney to oversee the accounts of Catherine O’Conner?

Damien Hannigan charged an excessive fee of €8,751.45 which is considered to be extremely expensive and an unnecessary expense. Although he was hired to oversee the accounts his fee is in excess of Catherine O’Conner’s fee.

Why do you Robert B. Marren refused to provide the correct invoice for Catherine O’Conner. Her invoice states Total Amount Due €584.25 while Cash Account dated 18th July, 2014 “Fees paid to Catherine O’ Connor €6,857.25.”

 

Question 10

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren to seek William Penrose B.L opinion.  Despite our numerous written requests No Invoice for William Penrose B.L. or explanation of why his opinion was sought. Did you pay Willie Penrose and what for?

The Estate was charged €1,230 for Willie Penrose’s opinion but no invoice was provided despite repeated persistent written requests. We were informed that Willie Penrose TD BL has refused to the investigating Garda a statement in relation to this matter.

 

As I have advised you in previous correspondence from the date you received and have withheld funds from my widowed sister Eileen Linney and I an interest rate of 8% per Month is accruing to the benefit of our accounts plus expenses because of your failure to make good on our legitimate claim.

Here is a link to file that was sent to DPP https://goo.gl/ryaqsf

 

The Law is as Straight as a Door Jamb,It’s those that implements the Law that’s CROOKED

Have a Nice Day

Michael Gavin

https://twitter.com/MichaelGavin83

https://www.facebook.com/michaelgavin83/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCe7ZmEXJVgkpLwfsOD9G9Sw

http://mikegavin83.com

Buy Financial Elder Abuse Book Amazon UK goo.gl/vbnCqF

Buy Financial Elder Abuse Book Amazon USA goo.gl/Mg6jDh

Posted in News, Solicitors Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,

Letter to Michael Gavin Petition Decision Makers Exposing Financial Elder Abuse

Letter to Michael Gavin petition decision makers

Letter to

Solicitor Mullingar Robert B Marren
Republic of Ireland Minister for Justice and Equality Charlie Flanagan TD Charlie Flanagan
Tormeys Solicitors Athlone Tony Henry
Minister of State at the Department of Health Jim Daly TD
Director General Law Society of Ireland Ken Murphy
The Hon. Ms. Justice Mary Laffoy Mary Laffoy
Tanaiste Frances Fitzgerald

 

85 Year Old Michael Gavin Will Expose Corrupt Solicitor Financial Elder Abuse in Ireland and Beyond.

Why should we tolerate Financial Elder Abuse?

As I have advised you in previous correspondence from the date you received and have withheld funds from my widowed sister Eileen Linney and I an interest rate of 8% per Month is accruing to the benefit of our accounts plus expenses because of your failure to make good on our legitimate claim.

I DEMAND that Folio Re Folio RN9544F and RN36155F be registered correctly to the beneficiaries of my late Brothers estate IMMEDIATELY.
Who authorized you to registered yourself as full owner to Folio RN36155F?? CAUGHT again Marren.

This case could have being deal with:

If Robert B Marren Solicitor had performed his duties as appointed by Judge Mary Laffoy to administer the Estate of my Late Brother Patrick Gavin. Marren followed the clear instructions of the other beneficiaries, as stated by Tony Watson Solicitor Law Society of Ireland.

If Robert B Marren had not deprived me the right to have my well-founded objections brought before a Judge. Marren confiscated the Department of Agriculture grants, so I was tricked into working for nothing for over 9 years minding farm animals. My widowed sister and I were also shorted €12,500 plus interest from the sale of the lands at auction, not to mention money that was deducted from my sister for cattle she never owned any cattle in her life.

If Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone had undertaken the written and verbal instructions given him though another solicitor to take proceedings against Marren and make him go before a Judge to address my valid objections instead of playing GOD in the matter.

If Tony Watson Law Society of Ireland had reprimanded Marren and Henry. Instead Watson threatened to block my email correspondence when I questioned whether Willie Penrose TD was paid for his opinion. No invoice to date has being provided for Penrose although the estate of my late Brother was charged. I very much doubt Penrose had much if anything to say for himself to the trained fraud investigator who questioned him.

If Peter D. Jones Westmeath State Solicitor (minus his penalty points) had responded to the correspondence on behalf of his client Robert B Marren. Jones threatened me not to peaceful protest outside his client Marren’s office. Coincidentally the Garda Fraud squad missed getting me home the first time they called unannounced as I was already on the road to peaceful assembly protest outside Marren and Jones offices in Mullingar.

If Linda Kirwan Solicitor from the Society of Ireland fit her purpose and reprimanded Penalty Points Jones State Solicitor for failing to answer the 20 questions I posed to him in regard to his client Robert B Marren’s administration of my late brother’s estate. Kirwan although she did send literature stating that by law a solicitor must provide a bill of costs to his client, she fails to enforce this law.

Have a nice Day

Michael Gavin

Posted in News, Solicitors

HAS THE TIME ARRIVED TO STORM THE COURTS TO DEMAND JUSTICE?

One fact remains obvious in Irish society and that is justice only applies to the establishment and those who can afford to pay for it.

If justice applied equally to everyone, our prisons would be full of crooked civil servants, corrupt politicians, rogue Gardai and treasonous bankers.

But instead the prison population primarily consists of those from the poorer classes of society because they just do not matter, are poorly served by the legal aid system and have no connections in authority to do their bidding with nods, winks and freemason handshakes.

The light prison sentences and even no sentences handed down to corrupt bankers is proof that there is one law for the establishment and another law for the rest of us. And yet we continue to shrug our shoulders in acceptance of such inequality.

This time last year an anti corruption activist was sentenced to 5 years in prison for harassing a Garda on line. The day Sean Carragher was found guilty he was denied bail pending sentencing.

Upon passing sentence, Judge Pat McCartan (an average solicitor appointed to the bench by his political party Democratic Left) said he was making an example of Carragher.

Last week a Garda detective was found guilty of harassing an employee at the DPP’s office in what was a case of far more series harassment than what Sean Carragher was sentenced for. But the Garda is on bail pending a sentencing hearing.

The likelyhood of her receiving a 5 year prison sentence is remote, but had she been Mary or Joe Public she would be preparing for a long stretch.

The fighting spirit is gone in Ireland. No longer are we outraged at gross injustices being perpetrated against ourselves by a rogue state.

Maybe the notion of storming and occupying some of these courts when the elites are in the dock does not seem such a bad idea. It has already been done at some of the Registrar’s Courts.

Or maybe we should just carry on watching RTE Six One News with Bryan Dobson. That way we can be outraged at the refugee crisis in the Mediterranean, Donald Trump’s latest tweets and North Korea’s latest test missile.

Posted in The Real Irish Media - Can you handle the truth?

Does Robbie Henshaw knows how ROBERT MARREN makes his money?

RobbieHenshaw

Robbie HenshawRobbie Henshaw and Sophie Marren at the Leinster Rugby Awards Ball. Picture: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile

 

Wonder if Robbie Henshaw knows how Sophie Marren’s father ROBERT MARREN makes his money? Financial #ElderAbuse

  1. Robert Marren Solicitor refused to award Michael Gavin the grant money’s paid down from the Dept. of Agriculture. Michael is owed over €116,000 for 9 years minding the farm Animals.

 

  1. Robert Marren Solicitor held onto the funds from the land sale for nearly 2 years, and then finally awarded to Michael Gavin and his sister €12,500 plus interest less than what we were each entitled to.

 

  1. Willie Penrose TD BL was not paid for his opinion, when the estate was charged for same.

 

  1. Robert Marren Solicitor Squandered the estate assets and hired an additional accountant at a cost of €8,751.45.

 

  1. Marren did not provide a “detailed bill of costs” for his fee of €40,892.53 he awarded to himself.

 

  1. No bill of costs was provided for T & N McLynn Solicitors, Athlone, paid an amount of €38,941 a year prior to closing.

 

  1. Tony Henry, Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone failed to undertake the instructions given him through John Glynn Solicitors to prevent Mr. Robert Marren closing in isolation to well founded objections.

Facebook Page Link https://www.facebook.com/michaelgavin83/

Posted in News, Solicitors

JOE DOOCEY – YOU ARE LIVING IN A POLICE STATE WHETHER YOU WISH TO BELIEVE IT OR NOT

joe doocey

joe doocey

Joe Doocey Jailed

YOU ARE LIVING IN A POLICE STATE WHETHER YOU WISH TO BELIEVE IT OR NOT ~ A change of tactic is now vital in fighting this corrupt state

On July 24th 2017 a leading anti corruption campaigner was jailed. Joe Doocey’s bail, on foot of an offence allegedly involving a hit and run, was revoked in the Criminal Courts Of Justice.

The Gardai claimed that Mr. Doocey broke the terms of his bail conditions, which were an undertaking that he would refrain from talking about his case on social media. A gagging order in otherwords. Doocey denied that he had broken his bail conditions.

What this means is that Joe Doocey could languish in Cloverhill Prison until next year’s trial date. One less trouble maker on the streets and on social media for Western Europe’s most corrupt justice system to deal with.

Joe Doocey’s incarceration comes less than 3 months after the imprisonment of another anti corruption activist Stephen Manning of Integrity Ireland and 2 months before life long anti corruption campaigner and once contributor to The Real Irish Media, Niall Doyle, answers charges under Wireless and Telegraphy legislation in Virginia District Court on 3rd October next.

He has been sent 10 summonses under said legislation because of his work in exposing state infiltration within Irish activism.

So the police state is alive and flourishing in Ireland and no amount of campaign groups or movements will be able to tackle it until such campaign groups tighten up, become more professionally organised and rid themselves of the looseness and casualness which is such an impediment to their progress.

The corrupt state is coming for you if you stand up to corruption. It is time for a rethink. Peacefully protesting outside the Dail with a placard and a grumpy looking head, surrounded by hash heads and the Garda Public Order Unit on a wet and miserable day has so far failed spectacularly.

https://www.facebook.com/The-Real-Irish-Media-Can-you-handle-the-truth-103330840018185/

joe doocey-2

Posted in News, The Real Irish Media - Can you handle the truth? Tagged with: ,

THE CASE AGAINST CLAIRE LOFTUS DPP

THE CASE AGAINST CLAIRE LOFTUS DPP

SPARE A thought for the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Claire Loftus. who finds herself targeted publicly in a way her predecessors
never were. Just over half way through her ten-year contract, the first female DPP has been having an annus horr,bths and now Leo Varadkar has stuck the knife in.

The most recent example of the DPP being criticised came in the wake of the high profile reported rape of a student in Sandymount, Dublin 4. in the ensuing controversy, the gardaI hit back and suggestions appeared in the media that Loftus should have ensured the suspect was charged immediately rather than a few days later.

In the Indo, “senior sources” claimed that “Gardai are … hampered by the direction of the DPP”. (The man has since been charged.)

This was merely the latest public potshot at Loftus and her office. She has had rather more to deal with in relation to recent high profile trials in which the DPP has found itself under the spotlight to an unprecedented degree.

The debacle surrounding the trial of former banker Sean Fitzpatrick may have cast the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (ODCE) as the bad guy but there was plenty of collateral damage to Loftus as a result of perceived inaction by the DPP’s office over the coaching of witnesses that effectively led to Judge John Aylmer ordering that the jury acquit Seanie Fitz.

That the most important white collar prosecution in the history of the state, which had run for a whopping 126 days (involving two trials), should end in such a spectacular mess drew a tsunami of criticism from the media, politicians and the public.

At the heart of the farce was the fact that two key witnesses had been coached and that documents relating to this episode had been shredded by ODCE lead investigator, Kevin O’Connell. Moreover, during the trials it emerged that as far back as 2010 and 2012 the DPP had been sent reports outlining how statements were being taken (“written by committee”).

Seven weeks into the first trial in 2015, the issue of the coaching of witnesses and shredding of documents led to that trial’s collapse. While it might have been expected then that Loftus would enter a nolle prose qui, a second trial was undertaken this year, resulting in what now seems the inevitable outcome.

Questions have been asked since then about why the DPP proceeded with the case in such circumstances. Predictably, there has been no public statement by Loftus on the mess.

Hardly had the dust settled on the Seanie Fitz farce than Loftus was back in the spotlight courtesy of another high profile trial, in which seven individuals. including Solidarity TD Paul Murphy. were charged with the very serious crime of false imprisonment of Labour’s Joan Burton and her assistant at a 2014 protest in Jobstown.

Once again, the result was that the defendants were cleared and Loftus was criticised for bringing such extreme charges, given that the DPP had a range of lesser offences available to her under the Public Order Act.

It has since been suggested that the statue of limitations had run out on these lesser charges and leaks from the DPP’s office claim that Loftus commissioned a legal opinion on the subject of whether the charges of false imprisonment could be
brought. The emergence of such information from the normally watertight Infirmary Road DPP headquarters suggests that the stress is starting to show.

The fallout from the acquittal of the ‘Jobstown Seven’ has heaped further pressure on Loftus and her team. For example, Murphy has called for other charges relating to the incident be dropped by the DPP, while Fianna Fail’s Niall Collins said the result in the trial had raised questions about the role of the DPP.

There have also been growing calls for Loftus to take action on grounds of contempt against assorted individuals, including Murphy, over the use of social media in and ardund the trial. The mainstream media has been particularly nonplussed over the failure
to lock up the tweeters, while FF’s Jim O’Callaghan noted that responsibility for ensuring that contempt does not occur “rests on the DPP and the court”.

And as if all this wasn’t enough for the hapless Loftus, Leo Varadkar has now turned up the heat significantly. Buried in a lengthy interview with the Sindo earlier this month. he said, “1 think it’s reasonable for the head of Government to express a concern held by a lot of the public that prosecutions aren’t always taken to the highest standard”. Coming from the Taoiseach, this public criticism of Claire Loftus’ s office is unprecedented.

The Phoenix Magazine @thephoenixmag

Posted in Uncategorized

Response to Vague Arrogant Solicitors Letter from Robert B Marren Mullingar

Marren in response to your VAGUE ARROGANT letter of the 19th of July 2017, in which you confirm that you are proceeding with the registration of the beneficiary’s ownership to the dwelling house that I currently reside in and that registration will be completed in the not too distant future.

This response is not acceptable to me.

Re Folio RN9544F

https://www.landdirect.ie/

Further to my recent letter of June 28th 2017 to you and pervious communications on this matter with Mr. Eugene Finneran, Land Registry, Roscommon I am of the understanding that folio RN9544F containing the home where I currently live should be transferred out of my deceased brother Pat Gavin’s name into Michael Gavin’s name and all the beneficiaries, with my right to reside in the home for the rest of my days as per my father’s will.

 

My brother Pat Gavin died intestate October 2005, there is no good reason why I should have to wait for “registration will be completed in the not too distant future”. You Mr. Robber Marren Paid yourself handsome already so do your Job!

Re Folio RN36155F

https://www.landdirect.ie/

Although I have queried you in relation to the Folio RN36155F  in my recent letter of June 28th 2017 and numerous times prior you neglect to mention your intentions with regard to this folio.

You are currently registered as full owner of Folio RN36155F which contains the historical “Old House” where I and a number of my siblings were born and reared.

Who authorized you to registered yourself as full owner to Folio RN36155F?

Now that  the administration of my late brothers estate has been completed according to you, I DEMAND that Folio RN36155F  be registered correctly to the beneficiaries of my late Brothers estate IMMEDIATELY.

I also demand a response to the following

(No Response to date from your State Solicitor Peter D Jones Date 12/04/2016)

 

I demand that you provide documentary evidence of the following:

Invoice for Willie Penrose’s TD fee that the estate was charged for.

Proof that Willie Penrose TD BL was in fact paid for his opinion.

Correct invoice for Catherine O’Connor.

Proof that you Robert B. Marren received €165,000 from Anne Sanford and Kathleen O’Keefe through their solicitor Tony Mc Lynn of T & N McLynn Solicitors Athlone to cover Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney’s 1/6 share from the land sale.

Invoice for John Dolan Auctioneer Ballinasloe, Co. Galway

Detailed bill of costs for your fee Robert B. Marren

Detailed Bill of costs for T&N McLynn solicitors Athlone.

 

Provide answers to the following:

Why Did you Robert B. Marren refuse to award Michael Gavin the grant money paid down from the dept. of Agriculture? I Mike Gavin am owed over €116,000 for 9 Years unpaid.

Why did you Robert B. Marren hold on to the funds from the land sale for nearly 2 years?

Why did you Robert B. Marren award me Elderly Michael Gavin and my widowed sister €12,500 plus interest less than what they were entitled to?

Why did you Robert B. Marren deduct €3,500 from Eileen Linney for Animals she never owned?

Why was no invoice provided for William Penrose’s TD BL opinion?

Why did you Robert B. Marren hire an additional accountant Damien Hannigan 7 Oliver Plunkett St. Mullingar at a cost of €8,751.45 to oversee the Accounts?

Why did you Robert B. Marren not provide the correct invoice for Accountant Catherine O’Connor?

Why did you Mr. Robert B. Marren not provide a “Detailed Bill of Costs” for your fee of €40,892.53 you awarded to yourself?

Why did you Robert B. Marren Solicitor consider the other beneficiaries to be your clients?

Law Society of Ireland rejects complaint

Why did you Robert B. Marren distribute the estate assets in isolation to well-founded objections?

Why did you Robert B. Marren refuse to take the well-founded objection to a Judge?

Why did you Robert B. Marren threaten 2 of the elderly beneficiaries and coerce them to retain a solicitor to prevent you distributing the estate assets?

Why did you Robert B. Marren distribute the estate assets speedily over the Christmas period 2014 in the knowledge that 2 of the beneficiaries were actively attempting to retain a solicitor to act on their behalf?

Why did Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone fail to undertake the instructions given him through John Glynn Solicitors to prevent you Mr. Robert Marren closing in isolation to well-founded objections?Tony Mclynn Solicitor

Why did T & N McLynn Solicitors, Athlone summon (special)me Mike Gavin and Eileen Linney to the High Court attempting to sell my home along with the farm and failed after three days squandering estate assets with fees in the High Court?

Why was no bill of costs provided for T & N McLynn Solicitors, Athlone, paid an amount of €38,941 a year prior to the distribution of the estate assets?

Why do you Robert Marren refuse to provide answers to these and other questions?Peter D Jones State Solicitor Mullingar

Why Have you Robert B. Marren retained Peter D. Jones  Mullingar State Solicitor to represent you?

Why does Peter D. Jones THREATEN me Elderly Michael Gavin Not to PEACEFUL Protest outside your Solicitors Office?

Why should we tolerate Financial Elder Abuse?

As I have advised you in previous correspondence from the date you received and have withheld funds from my widowed sister Eileen Linney and I an interest rate of 8% per Month is accruing to the benefit of our accounts plus expenses because of your failure to make good on our legitimate claim.

Have A Nice Day!

 

Michael Gavin

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with: , , , , , ,

Eugene Deering Opinions are like ass holes everyone has one!

 

In response to the Eugene Deerings advice

 

 

Paragraph 1 of Eugene Deerings Letter to Kevin Boxer Moran

 

“Matter were investigated by the Law Society and a series of complaints were not upheld against a solicitor who dealt with the late Patrick Gavin’s estate. Pat Gavin died Intestate on the 10 of October, 2005.”

 

That is correct complains were made to the Law Society of Ireland against Robert Marren Solicitor, and Tony Watson Solicitor from the law society concluded that Marren had followed the clear instruction of his clients the other beneficiaries of the estate then threatened he would block further emails. Linda Kirwan from the Law Society sent information leaflet stating that by law, solicitors are obliged to furnish information about their costs in writing. However it would appear that the society consider Marren to be above this law, not to mention my other will found objections made to them in relation to the unfair manner in which he administered the estate of my late brother Pat Gavin.

 

Paragraph 2 of Eugene Deering’s Letter to Kevin Boxer Moran

 

“Issues appear to have arisen over the distribution of that estate which has led to Michael Gavin and his sister, Eileen Linney making various and lengthy unfounded claims against various solicitors, accountants, auctioneers, departments of agriculture officials etc over recent years. Following Patrick’ Gavin’s death, Michael Gavin continued farming the lands and caring for the livestock in the expectation that he would be allowed continue doing so by the rest of the family. However this was not possible, as disagreements appear to have arisen between Michael Gavin and Ann Sanford and Kathleen O’Keefe. Ultimately, as per law of intestate, Michael Gavin forced to sell off the livestock (possibly because the herd was, in fact, owed by the deceased – though Michael Gavin disputes this) and surrender the lands for the sale in due course of the administration of the Estate.”

 

I challenge you Eugene Deering to backup your statement that I Michael Gavin or my sister Eileen Linney make unfounded claims. We are honest hard working individuals and have always stuck to the facts and told the truth throughout our lives. You also lie to Boxer that the herd was owed by the deceased. Marren,  make a decision in March 2013 to accept my claim to owning half the livestock and all the sheep?
14/03/13 Marren to Gavin & Linney, Page 59 of my book on Financial Elder Abuse.
But yet for no logical reason Marren refused to award me Michael Gavin the net amount €116,789.11 due to me out of the Single Payment Entitlements representing my ½ share in the profits from farming the lands.

EuegeneDeeringBlocked

 

Paragraph 3 of Eugene Deering’s Letter to Kevin Boxer Moran

 

I note that the Gavin’s have not taken any legal action to correct any perceived wrong in the setting of their late brother’s estate.

Another Lie Eugene. Our family solicitor John Glynn gave Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone instructions to represent us.

“Finally, for the purpose of endeavoring to avoid further proceedings in the matter, I would suggest that you immediately telephone Robert Marren to advise him that you have received instructions to act and enquire just where exactly does he stand in this matter and enquire whether or not his hands are tied by the instructions received from Messrs. Sanford & O’Keeffe and/or their Solicitors, Messr. T & N McLynn.”

Henry failed to undertake his instructions and went to send a threatening letter to my elderly widowed sister after the law society upheld the complains made against him. Martin Egan Solicitor Athlone advised us get an out of town solicitor as Marren is the son-in-law of Aiden O Carroll retired solicitor. Peter D. Jones the State Solicitor refuses to respond to correspondence for his client Robert B. Marren.

Why should we at our age be coerced into taking legal action. If Marren had dealt with our objections and taken the matter before a Judge as he was advised do in writing through our family solicitor John Glynn then there would be no need for further legal expense.

Michael Gavin to Robert Marren on 5th December, 2014 stating;

“If a fair allowance is not made on an agreed basis, I will not give my consent to any distribution account prepared by you. Similarly, my sisters will also have to agree before a distribution account can be finalised and a distribution effected. Accordingly you as Administrator will be unable to distribute the estate unless you can procure agreement between us and, if this agreement is not forthcoming, I am advised the only way you, as Administrator, can be protected is to go back into Court and get a Court Order directing how the estate can be distributed.”

 

Paragraph 4 of Eugene Deering’s Letter to Kevin Boxer Moran

 

Instead, they have instigated a social media campaign, together with sending correspondence to an array of public figures, local, national and international to invite support for their perceived wrongs. Michael Gavin has also purported to have set up a number of websites seeking justice.

We have every right to express our dissatisfaction of the way the justice system operates in Ireland. Although this whole matter is a source of embarrassment to us, we will have no hesitation in disclosing same in the public domain, as it is our belief that the general public have a right to be made aware of the events that took place and let them judge for themselves based on the true facts and we will continue to do so via twitter, facebook, youtube, linkeden, website blogs. letters and published books.

Paragraph  5 of Eugene Deering’s Letter to Kevin Boxer Moran

 

To bring legal proceedings would be very costly and would enjoy an excellent prospect of failing. Indeed, their complaints would be very likely to fail on the grounds of being vexatious and without merit and/or an abuse of process.

Now Eugene your playing judge and jury. A wise man familiar with our case once tweeted “To commit fraud is an offense in Ireland. But the prosecution for such will depend very much on where you reside on the social scale #vinb”

 

Paragraph  6 of Eugene Deering’s Letter to Kevin Boxer Moran

 

“There is also grave doubts that both Gavins, who are elderly, are orchestrating the various websites established, or indeed, Michael Gavin, who is 83 years of age, has written the various letters to the various recipients as the language and perplexity of the legal issues involved appears to be beyond the educational attainment of Mr. Gavin (who by his own admission worked the land all his life).”

The content on the websites is nothing more than a rehash of the substantial case to council files that was sent to Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors, who sat on same for 2 months and complaints made to the Law Society of Ireland.

A witnessed statement was made to 2 members of Roscommon Garda Fraud Squad basically stating that I Michael Gavin stand over all the information in the websites and affirm it to be the whole truth and nothing but the truth. My number plate were issued in 1932 so that makes a fit 85 year old who reared 14 hopper of turf this year.

Who gives you the authority to lord your education over me Eugene Deering? probably funded by my hard earned taxes.

While the language and perplexity of the legal issues involved may well be beyond my educational attainments, I have no difficulty reading and comprehending same I AM NOBODIES FOOL.

 

 

Eugene Deering’s Conclusion to Kevin Boxer Moran

 

I would strongly urge not to enter any representations on this matter, to inform the parties that you do not have any expertise in the area to assist them.

I would also recommend that you do not enter into correspondence with them or to prolong any communications with them.

We would strongly urge you Eugene Deering PC not to advice Kevin Boxer Moran TD or others on matters you are not fully familiar with. A man with your educational background and expertise should know better than to BLAGGARD another in that way. In my estimation you are no better than the solicitors, accountants, auctioneers, department of agriculture officials and others who had their part to play in defrauding my widowed sister and I.

We would recommend that you get your facts straight and tell the truth in any further correspondence and/or communications you may have regarding my case which constitutes Financial Elder Abuse of the highest order.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/eugene-deering-pc-9000b628/

@EugeneDeering

deeringe@gmail.com

 

Have a Nice Life

@MichaelGavin83

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in News Tagged with: , , , ,

Brendan Howlin Labour the Paedophile Party

THIS MAN JUST CALLED DONALD TRUMP A RACIST AND A HOMOPHOBE ~

But at least Trump does not pay vulnerable under age boys for sex in Central Park NY.

But Brendan Howlin, a corrupt liar, whose niece is involved in criminal activity within the office of the DPP while out of her head on cocaine, has plenty of form in driving around Dublin’s Phoenix Park in pursuit of under age rent boys.

It was no surprise that his friend and Labour Party colleague George Stagg got caught doing likewise in 1994.

If ANY politician in Donald Trump’s America, for all of that country’s faults, was caught red handed committing statutory rape against an under a Read more ›

Posted in The Real Irish Media - Can you handle the truth? Tagged with: , , ,

Kathleen OKeefe Anne Sanford Exposed for Robbing my Dept of Agriculture Grants

After listening to a recording of the telephone conversation Kathleen O’Keefe had with the man from Cork I wish to state the following in response.
You state to a stranger that my nephew came back after many years while your brother (Pat Gavin) who owned the farm was still alive and your brother was dead within 7 months.
Have you reported this to the Garda Fraud Squad and if not why not? Did you not in fact say to the Garda Fraud Squad that my nephew Michael cared for your 2 brothers when you were making your statement?
You go on to say that this is all greed on our part. You state that you and the rest of the family wanted to leave the farm to me without any interference but that I wanted my good friend and parish priest Father Sean to sit down with us. What is wrong with that? You Kathleen retaliated by sending that good Holy Man a BULLY BOY solicitors letter from (one of your many solicitors) Toher Solicitors Cork a letter telling Him to mind his own business did you not you Bully.
You also stated that my nephew sent an email in your name Kathleen O’Keefe to a very vulnerable person with nasty stuff in it. That sound serious and should be reported to Garda Fraud Squad.
Why does my nephew exposing Injustice and Financial Elder Abuse i have suffered harrass you KathleenO’Keefe? My book recounts the true facts of what transpired and haven’t we the right to share that experience in an effort to prevent the same devilish deeds occurring again.
You state numerous times through the recording I heard that my sister Eileen and my nephews motives are based on greed. Now if that’s not the pot calling the kettle black I don’t know what is. What have they or I gained to date from this saga as a result of your Greed, Kathleen O’Keefe.
You maintain the reason Anne Sanford USA bid at the land auction is because ye were maddened by the fact that my nephew Michael spoke up for me and requested that no one bid against me. Well actually for your record it was Father Neylon who suggested that I do that and on account of me being nervous my Nephew stood up with me and spoke on my behalf.
You state that you are left with the fall out of Anne Sanford placing the winning bid which was unfortunate, at bidding over the odds at the auction, that you are out of pocket embarrassed; you didn’t want it in the first place and had nothing to do with the distribution that was done independently.
Independently alright under your clear instructions to Robert Marren, my objections were not entertained.
John Glynn of Patrick Hogan and Co. our family solicitor for generations suggested that you Kathleen O’Keefe were the one making the bullets for Anne Sanford to fire and I believe this to be true.
You also make an issue that Marren was appointed by our side. Actually he was suggested by the Barrister, that was with Eileen and I and agreed by your side based on the fact that none of us knew Robert B Marren prior. You and your sister Anne Sanford got a special summons through your solicitor Tony McLynn Athlone in an attempt to sell the roof over my head and put me out on the street knowing full well that I had the right to live there for the rest of my days and now attempt to maintained that I am brain washed by those who stood and stand beside me to this day. Who paid for those 3 days in the high court, ye didn’t ever show up the first day, sick with embarrassment no doubt. Who minded the animals for the 3 days? there was no deduction made to cover that cost of that man. In fact you and your devious spiteful sister Anne Sanford Wellesley USA (not mine but John Glynn solicitors words) would stop at nothing in squandering the Estate assets.
How do you maintain you are out of pocket when you and Sanford walked away with a FREE farm of land and nearly €40,000 and a further €10,000 a year in grants for lands that you never use as none of ye has any interest in farming.
How can you truthfully say that we were mad for Solicitorsand mad for barristers but don’t want to pay for it?
We had one and only one solicitor John Glynn who was quite capable of administrating the estate. How many did you involve that we know about? First there was John Glynn whom ye attempted to intimidate with a tape recorder and then reported the honourable man to the law society, who advised him to step aside.
Then ye got Tony McLynn Solicitor Athlone who maintained I was intermingling in our late brothers estate. A bit rich considering I was eventually tricked into minding the estate animals for near on 10 years with not a copper for my time or expense in looking after the animals.
Then according to a letter from Tony Watson at Law Society of Ireland ye were the clients of Robert B Marren, which might explain why Tony Mc Lynn was paid in full a year prior to Marren closing.
Lets not forget Toher your Cork solicitor you Kathleen O’Keefe hired to attack Fr. Neylon.
As regards payments we had no say in who got paid what.
It was a high court order that McLynn and John Glynn be paid by Your Solicitor Robber Marren. However Marren refused to pay John Glynn based on your objections I suspect.
As for Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone he failed to undertake the instructions given him to prevent your solicitor (the solicitor for the estate) Robert Marren closing in isolation to my well found objections, so no fee was charged there.
The two Solicitors at the Law Society of Ireland namely Tony Watson and Linda Kirwan, are not fit for purpose, Watson threatened to block my emails after I highlighted that no invoice was provided for Willie Penrose TD BL and questioned whether in fact he was paid.
Although Kirwan did inform us that it is against the law Marren not to provide a bill of costs. Who will enforce their law has yet to be determined!
So by all accounts it was you Kathleen O’Keefe that was mad for Solicitors and mad for barristers but did not want to pay for it. You are the one who “LOVES ALL THIS” as you put it.

Exposing the truth is not bullying tactics, the truth prevails at all times.
You say there would be no problem if your brother Patrick made a will but he didn’t, well I know what he would have wanted and so do you.
You say you paid well over the odds for the piece of land on the day of the auction and that you are very annoyed well who’s fault is that only your own. I offered to compensate you and the beneficiaries verbally and in writing countless times for the farm but you refused to entertain my wishes. Instead you bulldozed ahead defaming characters and squandering the estate assets of our late brother on legal fees. Our late brother had no time for solicitors so why did you encourage that.
You say you care for me your brother no matter what, what after what you have done.
Take a look at yourself your own siblings, those of Anne Sanford’s and those you permit to occupy the lands I farmed all my life, and remove the splinter from your own eyes before conducting further character assignations on those that genuinely care for me.
Why did you require a lease prepared by a Solicitor if you are the honest trust wordy person you claim to be that wouldn’t do anybody out of anything? That was a 10 year standard leases you tricked me into signing and I had to go to the expense of getting my family solicitor the one you reported to the law Society to write a number of letters to your solicitor tony mclynn to make necessary changes. Your lease was only for 1 year with a condition that required me to “plough and reseed” poor quality lands that were never ploughed before, you exclude the hay shed and cattle crush making out that you wanted them for storage, what storage none of ye ever set foot on the place since, and regardless how was I supposed to test my animals as required. Your solicitor Tony McLynn finally made the necessary changes and apologied to me in writing for the errors he made under his clients instructions. There was no mention of covering the necessary solicitor costs I incurred though. Yet again you attempted to take advantage of my good nature. No right minded farmer would ever consider accepting the terms you proposed. That lease covered a period prior to Marren closing the property and thereby facilitated same. Although the cattle I lease the land of you to care for were my own and not the estates your solicitor followed your clear instructions and deducted €3,700 from me and a further €3,700 from Eileen and as you well know your sister never owned any stock. Regardless you made a fool of me again.Who would willingly lease lands to mind another’s animals?
I also heard you say that your intention was to allow me farm the lands in peace for the rest of my days. Why then did you write to me a number of months prior to the one year lease expiring and request that I vacate the land as you had other plans and would NOT be renewing the one year lease? I often wonder do you play the same tricks with the Meyers family who lease the better quality lands down the fields or do you just allow them in for FREE to spite me. Normal people would avoid using land involved in a family dispute but not them, not that Pat RIP or I ever had much time for them and their carry on.
You also say that by law your solicitor marren has to keep MY HOME in his name until such time as it needs to be distributed and it can never be distributed because my brother has a home there, that’s his home, we made sure it was left like that.
No Kathleen O’Keefe you and Anne Sanford took me to the High Court for 3 days as mentioned above in an attempt to sell my home that I have a right to live in per our fathers will for the rest of my days. You made out that it would not be possible to sell the farm lands without my home. Only for Judge Mary Laffoy I would be completely homeless now all thanks to you. Why can’t you accept the truth of your actions and stop continually blaming others for your own misgivings.
As far as I am concerned now that your solicitor under your clear instructions has finished robbing me of my grants and fair share from the farm auction he needs to put the House and gardens in the beneficiaries names with the stipulation that I have the right to remain living here as per our fathers will. The only reason he keeps his name on the house is to insure another pull of money down the road which will amount to the value of the property if the solicitors have their way.
In the conversation you consistently belittle and defame the character of my nephew making out that he’s on the dole, which he is not. Who are you to speculate, after all social welfare supported your husband and family for many a year when ye returned from London with one arm longer that the other. Did not our sister Eileen, myself and other members of your family lend you Kathleen O’Keefe a substantial amount of money to help you buy a shop in Cork, not to mention the rental houses our deceased sister Teresa bought and paid you to manage. I went to work at 14 years of age under our fathers name to help feed the rest of ye and fund your education in boarding school, and this is how you repay me! Not as much as a Christmas card to your deceased Mother after all she did for you.
You make out its our fault that the family is at logger heads and that’s why no one comes to visit me anymore. Well who caused it only yourself not that any of ye ever came to visit much prior to our brother Pats death RIP.
You admit you paid over the odds for the farm at auction yet you Kathleen O’Keefe with your sister Anne Sanford came to me numerous times prior to closing and attempted to convince me to buy the farm of you at your over the odds price, that you trapped yourself into. Then instead of using your own money you convinced you Solicitor Robert Marren to follow your clear instructions to use the grant money paid down from the department of agriculture to pay me my share. You Kathleen O’Keefe and Anne Sanford lied to me countless times saying that you would contribute toward the cost of buying silage and nuts to feed the cattle that ye reaped a share of the gross profits from. Finally you told me that it would be sorted out at closing and it was and I was left out of pocket over €116,000 for the 9 years I spent working for nothing funded by my own savings and old pension. My sister and I were also shorted €12,500 each plus interest from our share of the land sale and another €7,500 was deducted from us for cattle I owned and was leasing the lands to house. Tony Henry the solicitor who we attempted to engage to take this matter before the courts failed to undertake his instructions and therefore you and your solicitor Robber Marren was able to follow your clear instructions unchallenged. That is the truth of what transpired.
The department of agriculture grants are to feed the farm animals and not the greedy solicitors and the beneficiaries of the estate that do nothing except cause trouble and squander the estate assets as far as I am concerned.
Have a Nice Day!

Michael Gavin

Posted in Book Launch Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

PRESS RELEASE Financial Elder Abuse of Michael Gavin

***** P R E S S R E L E A S E *****

HAS A SOLICITOR TAKEN UNLAWFUL
POSSESSION OF ELDERLY MAN’S HOME?

An elderly woman was this week shocked to discover that the deeds to the home of her 84 year old brother are in fact in the name of a solicitor. Roscommon woman Eileen Linney, who is the sole carer for her elderly brother Mike Gavin who lives at Taughmaconnell, Co. Roscommon, became suspicious when strange cars were seen around the area, whose drivers were asking questions regarding ownership of the rural cottage and garden. When she phoned the Land Registry HQ in Waterford, they informed her that the cottage and garden were in the name of Mr. Robert Marren, of Robert B. Marren & Co. Solicitors, Mullingar, Co. Westmeath.

Mrs. Linney and Mr. Gavin are the sister and brother of the late Pat Gavin, bachelor, who died intestate in 2005, thereby necessitating his farm be sold and the proceeds divided amongst his siblings. The High Court appointed Mr. Robert Marren of Robert B. Marren & Co. Solicitors as administrator of Pat Gavin’s estate. As part of these High Court proceedings that followed, the land was auctioned. The cottage and garden were not auctioned or sold as there was legal provision for Mike Gavin to reside there for the remainder of his life.

But the buyers of the farm itself were other sisters of Eileen Linney and Mike Gavin. These sisters do not live locally as they are in Cork and in the USA. To this day, Mike Gavin and Eileen Linney have not received their full-share of the land sale. Mike Gavin, as registered herd keeper of his late brother’s livestock after his death, spent thousands of Euro feeding the livestock. Grants to feed the animals, which were issued by the Department of Agriculture to the estate which is administered by Robert Marren Solicitor, were never handed to Mike Gavin, who is out of pocket by tens of thousands of Euro. Mr. Marren has charged the estate almost €41,000 in fees but without issuing a detailed bill of costs.

The straw which has now broken the camel’s back is the discovery that Mr. Marren is the REGISTERED OWNER of the humble home where Mike Gavin was born, raised and currently resides. What does this mean in legal terms? Who gains financially in the event of Mike Gavin’s death? With everything that has happened to date Mike Gavin and Eileen Linney believe that they are victims of financial elder abuse.
The following information was requested from Mr. Marren in writing but it was not adequately dealt addressed:

a) Invoice for Willie Penrose’s fee that the estate was charged for.

b) Proof that Willie Penrose was in fact paid for his opinion.

c) Correct invoice for Catherine O’Connor.

d) Proof that your client Robert B. Marren received €165,000 from Anne Sanford and Kathleen O’Keefe through their solicitor Tony Mc Lynn of T & N McLynn Solicitors Athlone to cover Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney’s 1/6 share from the land sale.

e) Invoice for John Dolan Auctioneer Ballinasloe, Co. Galway

f) Detailed bill of costs for your client Robert B. Marren

g) Detailed Bill of costs for T&N McLynn solicitors Athlone.
The following questions were asked in writing of Mr. Marren but none were satisfactorily answered:

1. Why Did Robert B. Marren refuse to award Michael Gavin the grant money paid down from the dept. of Agriculture? Mike Gavin is owed over €116,000 for 9 Years unpaid.

2. Why did Robert B. Marren hold on to the funds from the land sale for nearly 2 years?

3. Why did Robert B. Marren award Elderly Michael Gavin and his widowed sister €12,500 plus interest less than what they were entitled to?

4. Why did Robert B. Marren deduct €3,500 Eileen Linney for Animals she never owned? (Also deducted €3,500 from Michael Gavin)

5. Why was no invoice provided for William Penrose’s TD BL opinion?

6. Why did Robert B. Marren hire an additional accountant Damien Hannigan 7 Oliver Plunkett St. Mullingar at a cost of €8,751.45 to oversee the Accounts?

7. Why did Robert B. Marren not provide the correct invoice for Accountant Catherine O’Connor?

8. Why did Mr. Robert B. Marren not provide a “Detailed Bill of Costs” for his fee of €40,892.53 he awarded to himself?

9. Why did Robert B. Marren Solicitor consider the other beneficiaries to be his clients?

10. Why did Robert B. Marren distribute the estate assets in isolation to well-founded objections?

11. Why did Robert B. Marren refuse to take the well-founded objections to a Judge?

12. Why did Robert B. Marren threaten 2 of the elderly beneficiaries and coerce them to retain a solicitor to prevent him distributing the estate assets?

13. Why did Robert B. Marren distribute the estate assets speedily over the Christmas period 2014 in the knowledge that 2 of the beneficiaries were actively attempting to retain a solicitor to act on their behalf?

14. Why did Tony Henry of Tormey Solicitors Athlone fail to undertake the instructions given him through John Glynn Solicitors to prevent Mr. Robert Marren closing in isolation to well-founded objections?

15. Why did T & N McLynn Solicitors, Athlone (special) summon Mike Gavin and Eileen Linney to the High Court attempting to sell his home along with the farm and failed after three days squandering estate assets with fees in the High Court?
16. Why was no bill of costs provided for T & N McLynn Solicitors, Athlone, paid an amount of €38,941 a year prior to the distribution of the estate assets?

17. Why did/does Robert Marren refuse to provide answers to these and other questions?

18. Why Has Robert B. Marren retained you Peter D. Jones Mullingar State Solicitor to represent him?

A book has been written about this sad story of financial elder abuse. The Book is FREE to Read online here http://mikegavin83.com/book/ or a copy may be obtained from Amazon UK goo.gl/vbnCqF Amazon USA goo.gl/Mg6jDh

To draw public attention to this scandal, there have been a number of protests outside the offices of Robert B. Marren & Co. Solicitors, Castle Street, Mullingar, during 2016. These protests were attended by Mike Gavin, some members of his immediate family, his friends, neighbours and his supporters nationwide. But the ante will be upped considerably from next month, where Mr. Marren’s offices will be occupied by a number of elderly people who support Mike Gavin. These occupations will be without any pre warning and will be intended to cause maximum disruption to Mr. Marren’s legal practice until 84 year old Mike Gavin is given justice. We have seen TV reports recently about vulture funds, but one does not need to go much further than any Irish rural town to encounter ‘VULTURE LAWYERS’.

ENDS

Date: 24rd January 2017

Posted in News Tagged with:

Financial Elder Abuse Book pdf Exposing Legal Corruption in Rural Ireland

Click on Image Above to Read Book

[wppdf id=’1570′]

Paperback available Here

 

Comments

“Well written account of the injustice perpetrated against an innocent man aided and abetted by the Irish legal profession to steal this elderly man’s money from him. The solicitor should be charged and jailed.”

“This is a very sad case of an elderly man being cheated by the law. It’s very detailed and definitely worth a read, cases like this abound in Ireland, where people will behave in truly shameful manner where land is concerned.”

“Shocking Corruption Exposed by Elderly Farmer. This is Rural Ireland 2015. You won’t see this on 6.01 News.”

“To commit fraud is an offense in Ireland. But the prosecution for such will depend very much on where you reside on the social scale #vinb”

“This story highlights the blue-shirt mentality of current regime. People should read it and stand up against FG cowards and Bullies.”

“This type of practice is unacceptable and must undergo a radical review and renewal. Irish people, be they farmers or academics (one doesn’t exclude the other) trust these kind of professions to represent their clients’ interests. In this case it seems like that trust was exploited for personal gain.”

“This is Disgusting Travesty of Justice these Solicitors should be disbarred from Practicing for this ABUSE of their Position they are Traitors to our People Greedy disgusting Cretins who should be arrested & Jailed for their terrible ABUSE of this Man! WE are watching from Afar & We promise you we will get Justice for this Man!”

“This is the saddest story I have heard in all my fifteen years in Ireland. it is sad because it predicts the future and yet no-one cares because you are asleep. You Irish have made for yourself a bed of nails through your gutlessness and apathy. And let hell skelp it into ye.”

“His estranged family will have no luck for this. Denying water and shelter to someone is not part of our culture. What goes around comes around I’ve seen it happen before, maybe not this generation but the next. A curse on them.”

“Irish law society closed ranks apparently facilitating the denying of justice to an elderly farmer.”

“Hi Mike I have just read the whole story from beginning to end an utter disgrace very sad totally injust . can’t find the share button. I do hope that things will go right for him. The expense so far is unreal”

“What else should be expected in Ireland today. The real issue is too many have the attitude of  I’m all right jack so f*** you”

“Cases like this one rely on secrecy, sharing on social media may deter future fraud occurring within families regarding the beneficiaries of a will, it’s far too common.”

“As an Irish American dealing with a case with similarities there is no justice in this country for seniors…it should be reported in the media in the states. I will be doing so, have Sean Hannity get involved on Fox news he hates injustice!!”

“the mob in the legal world have no honour, respect or fairness its all about ..money”

“its a disgrace what has being done to this man and its theft ,,, so robert marren should be charged with theft , and its shame on tony mclynn solicitors for taking this case and for their huge fees they charged which is also theft, corruption at its best under the law”

“The Lawless Society are hell bent on benefitting themselves through legalised theft. Hiding themselves behind the Law and corrupting it, yet they cannot be tried for their crimes, because they run the courts.”

Mick Morrissey from Co Waterford – “The professions are worse than Dick Turpin ever was. Disgraceful behaviour meted out to this poor man.”

Most Rev Dr Michael Desmond Hynes from Greenore, – “A very very sad situation for Michael Gavin Heard Keeper.”

Johnny Keenan – “fair play to Michael, his family and friends for standing up to these bullies. The suits need to be taken to the cleaners. 2016 is the year of the downtrodden. Good luck and up the rebels.”

John from Kinnegad – “This is a disgrace . Robbers in suits they should be in jail.”

Liam Canavan from Co Kerry – “There are so many questions to be answered in this case. I hope the protest around there is strong.”

Robert McEvoy from San Antonio, TX – “I have a similar letter from the law society and I am waiting for the estate to be administered since the death of the disponer on Oct 2013. I believe I was taken advantage of because i live out of the country…”

Noreen Buckley from Ireland – “This is scandalous, all Solicitors need to be investigated. Too many cases of elder abuse go undetected through fear.”

Rob McGuirk from Dublin, – “Our country has become a black circus lead by evil, greedy clowns. With continuous fight, and courage like that shown by Michael Gavin there is still hope that being Irish can someday be something to be proud of again. Pay this man his money.”

James Manning from Shefford, United Kingdom – “Dear Michael I live in England but have close personal ties to your part of the world and the farming community there. I wish you every success in your fight for a little justice in an increasingly sordid world.”

Joan Stringer from Pottstown, PA – “I support Michael Gavin and stand behind him as a vital human being and an elderly man who deserves his compensation!”

Noreen from Cavan, – “This type of practice is unacceptable and must undergo a radical review and renewal. Irish people, be they farmers or academics (one doesn’t exclude the other) trust these kind of professions to represent their clients interests. In this case it seems like that trust was exploited for personal gain.”

John O’Mahony from Dublin, – “Irish law society closed ranks apparently facilitating the denying of justice to an elderly farmer.”

Stephen Gilgunn from Paris, France – “This situation needs to be sorted now so this man can have some peace.”

Garrett David O’Mahony from Co Kerry – “The Law societys former land and conveyancing solicitor is Fergus Appelbe Bandon Co Cork. a convicted fraudster who forged documents. Google it. and Google Colm Murphy Kenmare too. He fought the corrupt law society and won.”

Janice Montalto from St. Petersburg, FL – “This elder should absolutely receive the grant monies due him. And the 9 yrs back payment that was stolen from him.”

Anne O Brien from Kenmare, – “Seems like terrible abuse of old people by greedy legal people.”

Liz Keenan from Stockton, United Kingdom – “Think it is a disgrace how Michael has been treated.”

Katherine Winters from Newry, United Kingdom – “Completely unacceptable!”

Spudser Dayid from Co Cork, – “Stop Elder Abuse”

 

Paperback available Here

Posted in Book Launch, News Tagged with: , , , ,

Press Release Book Launch Outside Four Courts Not to be missed November 17th at 11am

Elderly 84 Year Old Roscommon Farmer Michael Gavin will be launching his book Financial Elder Abuse at entrance to Four Courts, Inns Quay, Dublin 7 on Thursday November 17th at 11am.

 
Preview Book on Amazon
financial_elder_abus_cover_for_kindle
Listen to Michael Here describe what happened
video
 
Michael describe here how the Gardai Interrogated him in his home
 

video2

 

Kind Regards
 
Michael Gavin
 
@michaelgavin83
Posted in Book Launch, News Tagged with: ,

John Martin Carr Galway soliticor struck off for misconduct

john-martin-carr-galway-soliticor-struck-off-for-misconduct

The High Court has struck off a solicitor for professional misconduct, including for misrepresenting himself as a partner in a law firm when he was not.
John Martin Carr (57), formerly practising in Rhatigan and Co, Liosbaun House, Tuam Road, Galway, had a “history of misdemeanours”, the president of the High Court, Mr Justice Nicholas Kearns, said.
A Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal had recommended last April that Mr Carr be struck off over misconduct in relation to professional undertakings given by him, on behalf of clients, in 2008 to two financial institutions. He had admitted failure to comply with an undertaking given by him for a client to Bank of Ireland Mortgages in November 2008. He also admitted signing the undertaking misrepresenting himself as a partner in William Davis and Co, the firm where he was working, when he was not a partner.
He failed to comply with another undertaking, also given in November 2008, on behalf of two clients to Springboard Mortgages and again misrepresented himself as a partner. On both occasions he did not hold a solicitor’s practising certificate. He had also admitted failure to comply with undertakings given to ACC in 2006 and AIB in 2007.
Paul Anthony McDermott, for the Law Society, said Mr Carr had a history dating to 1990 when the High Court limited his practising certificate. That history included an admonishment and €3,000 fine in 2009 for a 10-year delay in dealing with a client and a suspension in 2012 for failure to comply with conditions of his practising certificate.
Mr Carr appealed to the High Court to impose a lesser penalty than a strike-off and asked Mr Justice Kearns to allow him continue to work as a solicitor on the basis he would not have any involvement in conveyancing matters. He had been given the opportunity by the Law Society to comply with the undertakings to the financial institutions and had done so, he said.
The likelihood of him gaining other employment was limited, he was 57 and had dependants, he said. There had been no duplicity or deception involved in the matters against him, he added.
Mr Justice Kearns said, having regard to Mr Carr’s “previous history of misdemeanours”, he did not think the Law Society was being disproportionate in recommending a strike-off order. However, the Law Society would be failing its members and the public if it did not act and be seen to be acting, the judge said.

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/high-court/galway-soliticor-john-martin-carr-struck-off-for-misconduct-1.2063575

Posted in CrookedLawyer, News, Solicitors, Solicitors Struck Off Tagged with: , ,

Solicitor Colm Murphy struck off – repeated skulduggery on the part of officials of the Law Society

solicitor-colm-murphy-struck-off

Solicitor Colm Murphy struck off after Law Society falsely imputed an undertaking, and relied in part on a forged document and evidence from a fraudulent solicitor

By Frank Connolly http://villagemagazine.ie/index.php/2014/02/questions-for-law-society-solicitor-struck-off-after-law-society-falsely-imputed-an-undertaking-and-relied-in-part-on-a-forged-document-and-evidence-from-a-fraudulent-solicitor/

Allegations of “repeated skulduggery on the part of officials of the Law Society” are likely to be aired in the Supreme Court in the not too distant future when struck-off solicitor, Colm Murphy, finally gets his day in court.  Embroiled in a complex legal battle with the society long before, and since, he was struck  from the Roll of Solicitors in 2009, Murphy is determined that his former colleagues will no longer delay a full hearing of his claim for damages for  breach of duty, negligence, defamation and misfeasance in public office.

Kenmare-based Murphy has claimed in a detailed submission to the Supreme Court that his striking off was based on spurious and inaccurate information provided by the Law Society to its Disciplinary Tribunal and the High Court ten years ago. Key to the decision to strike him from the roll was a claim by a society official, Linda Kirwan that Murphy had breached an undertaking he had given to the President of the High Court. Kirwan insisted in an affidavit seen by Village that she had been in the High Court on the day the undertaking was made. It was only after the unfortunate Murphy was struck off that she admitted, in affidavit and in a letter to Murphy in 2010 that she was not in fact in the court when the supposed undertaking was made. No such undertaking is recorded in the order from the court issued on the day in question.

Murphy was also able to prove, again after the strike off, that the Law Society had taken attachment and committal proceedings against him based on a document forged by Frank Fallon who was subsequently jailed for two seven-year terms. Frank Fallon had claimed that he had not received title to a property even though he had paid Murphy and received a copy of the Deed from the then solicitor. It later turned out that the Deed in question was forged by Fallon and that no such transaction had taken place. Fallon from Charleville in Cork was sent to jail in Britain in 2009 after he was convicted of conspiracy to defraud by forging the wills of up to twelve people and stealing more than £500,000.

The Law Society case against Murphy also included an incorrect claim that he had attended an auction of the Brown Pub in Kealkill county Cork in August 2006 in breach of its rule that a retired solicitor without a practising certificate cannot participate in the sale of a property by a former client. This error sparked what are known as Section 18 procedures against the former solicitor. Murphy’s submission goes on to list various other defamatory allegations pursued by the society including an incorrect implication that his client account was overdrawn. Further, he claims that a suggestion by the President of the High Court, Nicky Kearns, back in 2010 that a full hearing of the case should take place was frustrated by the society which instead sought to restrict matters to a trial of ‘preliminary issues’ rather than a full civil action.  When the case came before Kearns again in June 2012 he queried why Murphy’s substantial case against the society had not gone ahead, as he had recommended. In his comments, Kearns referred to the case as a “spread-eagled mess” and referred to the claims of “alleged repeated skulduggery on the part of officials of the Law Society”.

If this was not the sort of thing that could bring the Law Society into disrepute, the back story to the whole affair raises even more disturbing questions about its modus operandi in dealing with allegations of wrongdoing by its members.  Murphy has insisted that his fall from grace originates in 2001/2002 when he complained about another member of the roll, Fergus Appelbe, who also had a conveyancing practice in west Cork and south Kerry.

At a recent Disciplinary Tribunal hearing in Dublin, Appelbe admitted to various trangressions, including putting together false deeds, updating deeds to defraud the Revenue and creating a double mortgage over the same property which he owned (the same misconduct as Thomas Byrne’s). Appelbe, who through his various companies may have incurred debts in excess of €50 million, is due to learn his fate in mid-February.

What is most extraordinary about “the spread-eagled mess” is that the society appeared to have based at least some of its unfounded suspicions about Murphy on information in complaints sent to it by Applebe over ten years ago.  As far back as 1987/1988, Appelbe was the subject of no less than two investigations by the RTE Today Tonight programme into his somewhat unorthodox conveyancing practices in the south west. The late Cathal O’ Shannon listed a series of allegations involving unusual land deals against Appelbe who, despite the unwanted attention, went on to invest in an impressive portfolio of properties including Waterford Castle through various companies before the crash and his rapid descent into catastrophic debt.

In August last year, a liquidator was appointed to the four-star castle, hotel and golf complex in Ballinakill after the operating companies, Negold Ltd. and Cendant Ltd. ended up with debts to the NAMA vehicle, National Asset Loan Management (NALM), of just under €34 million. Appelbe is one of four directors of the companies described in the High Court as hopelessly insolvent and unable to pay their debts.

In 2010, Allied Irish Banks (AIB) secured summary judgment orders for some €18 million against Cronin’s Wood, a development company for which Appelbe acted, over its failure to repay a loan to re-finance a property acquisition in Killarney, Co Kerry.

Mr Justice Peter Kelly granted the order against Cronin’s Wood Developments Ltd, South Mall, Cork, at the Commercial Court. He also entered judgment for €10 million arising from guarantees over the loan provided by Appelbe, and a businessman, Peter O’Sullivan, Oakwood Manor, Killowen, Kenmare (who died in June 2008).

Intriguingly, and notwithstanding the complaints against him, including by some of those who contributed to the Today Tonight programmes, Applebe was appointed to the Law Society’s Conveyancing Committee.  All in all, the full hearing of Murphy’s claim is eagerly awaited.  Murphy, who retired from the profession in 2005, is seeking to re-enter the strike off proceedings and be reinstated to the Roll of Solicitors.

Note:   the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal made the following ruling in early February concerning Fergus Appelbe.

Penalty: The matter was referred to the President of the High Court with the following recommendations ;-

 

  1. That Fergus Appelbe is not allowed to practise on his own –only with a solicitor of ten years standing
  2. That he is not permitted to act for himself or family members or any company he is involved with
  3. That he pays the Law Societies costs .
Posted in News, Solicitors, Solicitors Struck Off Tagged with:

James Conway Message Irish Government

James Conway Message Irish Government

Sligo man James Conway originally posted a video encouraging the Irish Government to take the €13bn in back taxes from Apple. Since then, the video has gathered more than 1 million views, earning Conway quite an online following.

James Conway hits back at Commenters

James Conway posted another video since then, lambasting some commenters for thinking they are better than him because they may be more informed on the economy.

In this video, James points out that everyone in Ireland plays a part in society and no person is better or more important than the other.

“They get up every morning, usually in a house that was constructed by someone like me. They get up in the morning and they wash their teeth and they go to the toilet. They turn on an electric light. All stuff that was brought into that house by a ‘ditch digger’ like me,” he said.

“Don’t turn around and say I’m lower than you, because every man, woman and child in Ireland is born equal. No one is born above me or below me.  I am equal to everyone. We’re all human beings.”

James Conway Back in London

Posted in james conway, News Tagged with: , ,

Financial Elder Abuse Book Launch Ballynacargy Westmeath Home to Willie Penrose TD and Robert Troy TD Dec 2nd

bookcoverpreview

84 Year Old Man Defrauded And Threatened By Irish Lawyers – Solicitors!!! – Are You Disgusted?
Book Preview Here
Book Launch #Ballynacargy Saturday December 3rd 2016

“This is a very sad case of an elderly man being cheated by the law. It’s very detailed and definitely worth a read, cases like this abound in Ireland, where people will behave in truly shameful manner where land is concerned.”
“Shocking Corruption Exposed by Elderly Farmer. This is Rural Ireland 2015. You won’t see this on 6.01 News.”
“To commit fraud is an offense in Ireland. But the prosecution for such will depend very much on where you reside on the social scale #vinb
“This story highlights the blue-shirt mentality of current regime. People should read it and stand up against FG cowards and Bullies.”
“This type of practice is unacceptable and must undergo a radical review and renewal. Irish people, be they farmers or academics (one doesn’t exclude the other) trust these kind of professions to represent their clients interests. In this case it seems like that trust was exploited for personal gain.”
“This is Disgusting Travesty of Justice these Solicitors should be disbarred from Practicing for this ABUSE of their Position they are Traitors to our People Greedy disgusting Cretins who should be arrested & Jailed for their terrible ABUSE of this Man! WE are watching from Afar & We promise you we will get Justice for this Man!”
Willie-Penrose-TD-BL
“This is the saddest story I have heard in all my fifteen years in Ireland. it is sad because it predicts the future and yet no-one cares because you are asleep. You Irish have made for yourself a bed of nails through your gutlessness and apathy. And let hell skelp it into ye.”
“His estranged family will have no luck for this. Denying water and shelter to someone is not part of our culture. What goes around comes around I’ve seen it happen before, maybe not this generation but the next. A curse on them.”
“Irish law society closed ranks apparently facilitating the denying of justice to an elderly farmer.”
“Hi Mike I have just read the whole story from beginning to end an utter disgrace very sad totally injust . can’t find the share button. I do hope that things will go right for him. The expense so far is unreal”
“What else should be expected in Ireland today. The real issue is too many have the attitude of I’m all right jack so f*** you”
“Cases like this one rely on secrecy, sharing on social media may deter future fraud occurring within families regarding the beneficiaries of a will, it’s far too common.”
“As an Irish American dealing with a case with similarities there is no justice in this country for seniors…it should be reported in the media in the states. I will be doing so, have Sean Hannity get involved on Fox news he hates injustice!!”
RobertTroy
“the mob in the legal world have no honour, respect or fairness its all about ..money”
“its a disgrace what has being done to this man and its theft ,,, so robert marren should be charged with theft , and its shame on tony mclynn solicitors for taking this case and for their huge fees they charged which is also theft, corruption at its best under the law”
“The Lawless Society are hell bent on benefitting themselves through legalised theft. Hiding themselves behind the Law and corrupting it, yet they cannot be tried for their crimes, because they run the courts.”
Posted in Book Launch, News Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dept of Agriculture Grants are to Feed Farm Animals NOT Greedy Corrupt Solicitors

Marren-Gavin-23-08-2016

marren,

I am writing in response to your letter dated 26th July, 2016 received by me a month later on 23rd August 2016. (VERY STRANGE)

As far as I am concerned the Dept. of Agriculture grants are to feed the farm animals and not you and the other devious spiteful beneficiaries who did nothing more than SQUANDER the estate assets of my late brother Patrick Gavin’s estate.

I wish to advise you rob, marren and your state solicitor peter PENALTY POINTS jones that as and from the date you received and have withheld funds from me an interest rate of 8% per Month is accruing to the benefit of my account plus expenses because of your failure to make good on my legitimate claim.

You rob, marren refused to award me Michael Gavin appointed “Herd Keeper” the grant money’s paid down from the Department of Agriculture. I am owed €116,789.11 plus interest for 9 years minding the farm animals.

You rob, marren held on to the funds from the land sale for nearly 2 years, and then finally awarded to me Michael Gavin and my Sister Eileen Linney €12,500 plus interest less than what we were each entitled to.

You rob, marren state in your letter that “you received further payments from the Department of Agriculture in the sum of €9,963.91 and there is a credit balance left in the Estate in the sum of €9,050.00 which you propose to distribute to the beneficiaries in the same proportions as was done at the interim distribution” WHICH I PURFUSELY OBJECTED TO. You fail to account for the €913.91 difference, which comes as no surprise to me bearing in mind that you have refused to date to provide me with a detailed bill of costs for your own fee of €40,892.53 representing  fees paid to Robert Marren & Co. were arrived at.

Who gave you the authority to deduct €913.91 from the payments from the Department of Agriculture and on what date did you receive those payments?

Written requests were made to you rob, marren for a detailed bill of costs on the following dates

17/10/14 Michael Gavin to Marren

06/02/2015 Gavin & Linney to Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitor

11/04/2015 Linney to Marren

13/04/2015 Gavin to Marren

19/05/2015 Linney to Marren

09/05/2015 Gavin to Marren

17/06/2015 Linney to Marren

I am of the opinion that the devil is in the detail and that is why you rob, marren refuses to furnish a “detailed bill of cost” for your excessive fee of €40,892.53 that you awarded to yourself.

I would like to draw your attention to page 3 of the Society’s information leaflet “Complaints About SOLICITORS” that “NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE” Linda Kirwan Solicitor

Head of Complaints and Client Relations Section at the Law Society of Ireland sent me.

Page 3 of the leaflet states

“*WHAT ARE EXCESSIVE FEES?

By law, solicitors are obliged to furnish information about their costs in writing. The Society publishes a leaflet on solicitors’ charges which is available from the society on request

If you are unhappy with your solicitor’s bill, you have two options:

  1. Make a complaint to the Complaints and Clients Relations Section, or
  2. Have your bill taxed (see page 10)”

It would appear that you rob marren are above this “BY LAW”

 

Your letter is vague with regards to the exact dates the payments from the Department of Agriculture were for, and I can only assume that they overlapped the 1 year period in which I leased the lands of my 2 estranged sisters kathleen o’keefe and ann sanford to facilitate the closing of the sale.

On 13-04-2015 I requested you rob marren to explain how you arrived at your decision to award the moneys received from the sale of Pat Gavin’s livestock together with the Gross payments received from the Department of Agriculture without deducting any expense for the minding, looking after, feeding and caring for the animals for the nine years from 2005 to 2014. In your response you stated

 “As Administrator, it fell to me to make a decision how to treat the proceeds of sale of livestock. I decided to split this between the Estate and your good self. However, I did not consider your claim for maintaining livestock to be justified, given that you were in possession of the estate lands for such a long period of time free of charge and the fact that you were the joint owner of the livestock anyway. I also based my decision on the Reports of the Estate Accountant and indeed the treatment of same on Farm Accounts.”

SO WHATS YOUR EXCUSE THIS TIME MR. ROBERT B. MARREN

Bearing in mind the fact that I had a 1 year lease agreement on the lands to house my remaining cattle.

You may recall one of the beneficiaries kathleen o’keefe rushed me into signing a lease agreement on 27th August, 2014 without providing me an opportunity to read over same carefully or to consider the matter. Consequently I were forced to get legal advice in order to amend a number of the conditions including my agreement to “having fully restored the lands to grassland by ploughing and reseeding by no later than the 31st of July 2015.” Lands that were never used for tillage, and even if they were who would commit to a short term 1 year lease with that condition. This appears underhanded to me and highlights the inadequate professional service provided by their solicitor t&n mclynn, Athlone. It is not of a quality that could reasonably be expected of a solicitor and served no purpose other than to force me to incur additional unnecessary expenses for legal advice to draft letters in response to the lease agreement kathleen o’keefe tricked me Michael Gavin into signing.

You rob, marren have not provided the correct invoice for Catherine O’Conner. Her invoice states Total Amount Due €584.25 while Cash Account dated 18th July, 2014 “Fees paid to Catherine O’ Connor €6,857.25. HOW MANY TIMES HAVE I BROUGHT THIS TO YOUR ATTENTION?

I am of the opinion that you rob, marren refuses to provide the correct invoice for Catherine O’Connor because it was she who did the work and your accountant damien hannigan’s invoice will highlight the work duplication.

You rob, marren did not seek my approval for seeking william penrose’s opinion. No Invoice for william penrose B.L. or explan\ation of why his opinion was sought.

You rob marren did not seek my approval for john dolan auctioneer. No Invoice for john dolan auctioneer and breakdown of the fee he was paid was provided to me to date.  As I recall the auctioneer john dolan did advertise the auction extensively and I recall full and half page ads appeared in the local newspapers.  I would argue that based on the amount of interest and bids made at the auction that these ads served no purpose other than to promote john dolans auctioneering service as a whole. To be honest a free mention in the local parish newsletter would have sufficed.

You rob, marren did not seek my approval for damien hannigan & Company Limited Chartered Accountant, Mullingar. Why was he hired against my explicate wishes to oversee the accounts of Catherine O’Conner. He charged in my opinion an excessive fee of €8,751.45 which I consider to be extremely expensive and an unnecessary expense.  Although he was hired to oversee the accounts his fee is in excess of Catherine O’Conner’s fee. John Glynn, Solicitor, Patrick Hogan & Co. did not put the Estate to the additional expense of hiring an additional Accountant so it begs the question why did you?

It would appear that you delayed making the decision regarding my share in the farming profits and rightful share of the grant monies received from the Department of Agriculture until the very end with the draft distribution account that contained countless errors on 18th September, 2014.

I was lied to countless times and led to believe that I would be refunded at closing by 2 of the beneficiaries namely ann sanford and kathleen o’keefe. Why did you rob marren make a decision around March 2013 to accept my claim to owning half the livestock and all the sheep? But yet for no logical reason refused to award me the net amount €116,789.11 due to me out of the Single Payment Entitlements representing my ½ share in the profits from farming the lands, which was also sent to you on the 5th of December, 2015 for your consideration. There is no good reason why you took advantage of my good nature and delayed your decision in this matter until the end.

You would have received a letter from me on 5th December, 2014 stating;

“If a fair allowance is not made on an agreed basis, I will not give my consent to any distribution account prepared by you. Similarly, my sisters will also have to agree before a distribution account can be finalised and a distribution effected. Accordingly you as Administrator will be unable to distribute the estate unless you can procure agreement between us and, if this agreement is not forthcoming, I am advised the only way you, as Administrator, can be protected is to go back into Court and get a Court Order directing how the estate can be distributed.”

However marren you passed the book to me and demanded court proceedings to prevent the distribution in a short space of time over the Christmas period 2014-2015.

I believe that you rob marren should NOT have finalised the distribution without addressing my objections, and it appears you did same to avoid paying my €82,500 1/6 share of the land from action in isolation to the rest of the estate.

While it would appear that these are matters that can only be dealt with by the court if they cannot be resolved by agreement I believe it should be the Administrator who goes back into Court to get a Court Order directing how the estate can be distributed not the ELDERLY BENEFICIARIES.

It would also appear that henry of tormeys solicitors, Athlone facilitated you rob, marren by not phoning  you or writing you immediately as requested by John Glynn Solicitor, (14/01/2015 John Glynn Patrick Hogan & Co. to Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone requesting him to ring and write a short letter to marren immediately confirming that he would act in the matter in response to marren’s threat to effect a distribution of the Estate.) nor did henry of tormeys solicitors, Athlone inform me, so that I could engage another solicitor to act on  my behalf.

I have difficulty understanding why henry of tormeys solicitors, Athlone failed to respond to correspondence, including correspondence that was crucial and significant.

At a subsequent meeting with henry after your closing he estimated that court proceedings to sue you could take up to 3 years with fees in the region of €60,000 to €100,000, and he suggested that I Michael Gavin should take my age (83 at the time) into consideration.

It now transpires that solicitors generally do not challenge each other in this manner. We were informed by a solicitor after the Estate assets were distributed that solicitors would not challenge marren as he was the son in law of a prominent retired Solicitor aiden o’carroll from Athlone.

It would appear you rob marren allowed confusion to arise in relation to the exact disbursement of funds and showed a complete disregard for the interests of the beneficiaries, whom you, rob marren solicitor, knew to be ELDERLY, and by your conduct is depriving two of the ELDERLY beneficiaries, of the enjoyment of their share in the estate. You have also forced me Michael Gavin and my sister Eileen Linney to incur additional unnecessary expenses in drafting documents and letters time and time again to prove our claim.

I reiterate what I told you before by registered post 11/07/2015 that although this whole matter is a source of embarrassment to me, I will have no hesitation in disclosing same in the public domain, as it is my belief that the general public have a right to be made aware of the events that took place and let them judge for themselves based on the true facts.

 

 

Michael Gavin

Posted in News, Solicitors Tagged with: , , , , , ,

Linda Kirwan Head of Complaints and Client Relations Section I wish to make a complain

Linda Kirwan Head of Complaints and Client Relations

Linda Kirwan

Solicitor

Head of Complaints and

Client Relations Section

 

12 August 2016

Ref 24430/G/19/7

Re Peter D. Jones

Dear Linda Kirwan,

In response to your letter dated 9 August 2016, I would like to draw your attention to page 3 of the Society’s  information leaflet “Complaints About SOLICITORS” that you enclosed with same.

Page 3 of the leaflet states

“*WHAT ARE EXCESSIVE FEES?

By law, solicitors are obliged to furnish information about their costs in writing. The Society publishes a leaflet on solicitors’ charges which is available from the society on request

If you are unhappy with your solicitor’s bill, you have two options:

  1. Make a complaint to the Complaints and Clients Relations Section, or
  2. Have your bill taxed (see page 10)”

Linda Kirwan Head of Complaints and Client Relations Section I wish to make a complaint to the Complaints and Clients Relations Section because to date, despite repeated written requests I have yet to be furnished with a bill of costs for Peter D. Jones state solicitors client Robert B. Marren who awarded himself €40,892.53 for the administration of my late brothers Patrick Gavin’s estate

We are of the opinion that the devil is in the detail and that is why Jones and Marren refuse to furnish a “detailed bill of cost” for the excessive fee of €40,892.53

Linda Kirwan Head of Complaints and Client Relations Section I would be much obliged if you would serve your purpose and investigate why now Peter D. Jones state solicitor for client Robert B. Marren refuses to provide a detailed bill of cost which as the leaflet you provided states Marren is obliged to provide by law.

I would also like to request the leaflet on solicitor’s charges.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Michael Gavin

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,

Elderly Mike Gavin Exposing Solicitors Financial Elder Abuse in Rural Ireland

Hello, thank you for visiting my Website/Blog. My name is Michael Gavin of Dundonnell, Taughmaconnell, Ballinasloe, Co. Roscommon, Farmer, Bachelor, born in 1932 and currently aged 83 years. My story highlight the injustice and financial elder abuse that is prevalent in our legal system today. The Solicitors the very ones who you would expect to uphold the law, as far as i am concerned do serve themselves first and foremost.

I stand over all the information in this website and affirm it to be the whole truth and nothing but the truth. It records events that took place since my brother Pat Gavin died Intestate on the 10th of October, 2005 some 10 years ago. If you have further questions or need clarification of some of the material contained in this document feel free to contact me, all are welcome.

My Brother Pat and I lived together all our lives over 70 years in our humble home Dundonnell, Taughmaconnell in south Roscommon. After Pat died intestate, I continued farming and caring for our animals as I had always done.

I offered to buy the farm from the next of kin beneficiaries, but they would agree to nothing and matters came to a head when under the guidance of Tony McLynn Solicitor Athlone they summoned me to the High Court in Dublin in an effort to sell the house my home along with the farm, making out that they would have difficulty selling the farm on its own. Their Solicitor Tony McLynn of T&N McLynn Solicitors, Athlone were well aware that I had a right to reside in the family home for the rest of my days as per my fathers will, but that did not prevent them squandering the Estate Assets. Three days in total were spent in the High court, the first of which they did not attend, the second they spent in a waiting room arguing among themselves and on the phone to other beneficiaries in the United States of America. Finally on the third day the Judge refused their request to sell the roof over my head.

The High Court appointed Robert Marren Solictor, Mullingar administrator for the estate. Subsequently my sister and I had one and only one meeting with Mr. Robert Marren Solicitor at his office Castle Street Mullingar, at which he enquired if we had our wills made. He informed us he intended to hire an additional accountant to oversee the accounts. We profusely  objected to this and told him it was an unnecessary expense for the estate, but he bulldozed ahead.

The issue of non-payment of grants from the Department of Agriculture to me the appointed herd keeper eat up many a letter and despite the fact that 2 of my estranged  sisters promised to buy feed stuffs and also suggested that I would be reimbursed at closing, I never got a cent and in essence I was forced to use my old age pension to feed the animals that would have starved otherwise for 9 years. They had no objection to accepting the gross payments from the sale of the animals, and although Mr Marren “made a decision” to finally accept my claim to owning half of the cattle and all of the sheep he could not see the logic to paying out the grant monies associated with same.

The lands were eventually auctioned and my 2 estranged sisters Anne Sanford, Wellesley, Mass USA & Kathleen O’Keefe, Glanmire, Cork placed the winning bid, however did not close in the required 30 day time frame. We consented to the remaining next of kin to waive their share, so they handed over just 1/3 of the purchase money with the agreed condition that they would cover the expenses associated with the Property Auction. They visited with me twice and requested that I buy the property of them and then suggested they would put the land up for sale but never did.

Mr. Marren Solicitor refused to pay out my sister Eileen and my share of the proceeds from the land sale despite the fact that he had same in his possession for nearly 2 years. He went on to threaten us that he intended to distribute the Estate Assets if we did not hire a Solicitor to issue proceedings to prevent him doing so despite our well founded objections, namely €116,789.11 compensation for minding the animals for 9 years and the amount awarded to  each my sister Eileen and I was short €12,500 each plus interest from the time Mr. Marren Received the funds.

Instructions were given to Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone through our family Solicitor to engage with Mr. Robert Marren on our behalf. However Tony Henry, Tormeys Solicitor did not undertake these instructions, nor did he inform us. We did not realize what had happened until the deficient checks arrived in the post.

We met with Mr. Henry some 2 weeks after, however he saw no fault in what he done or failed to do for that matter. He suggested we could engage him to sue Mr. Marren at a cost of up to €100,000, 3 years in court and  advised I take my age of 83 years into consideration.

Complaints were made to the Law Society of Ireland with regard to Mr Robert Marrens Administration of the Estate and Mr. Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Failure to undertake explicit instructions. Needless to say no fault was found. Then Tony Henry had a cheek to scribe the letter he did to my defenseless widowed sister. The letter arrived the day before the letter from the Independent Adjudicator’s who, no surprise found no fault in the manner in which the Law Society of Ireland dealt with our complaints. Begs the question how come Henry know before we did and why did he not act as speedily to undertake the instructions given him on our behalf originally?

We were later informed that Robert Marren refused to pay John Glynn, Solicitor, Patrick Hogan & Co. until we stop threatening him as he puts it by reporting him to the Law Society of Ireland. Also an activist via social media told us that Willie Penrose TD BL stated he had not received his payment from Robert Marren, Solicitor, Mullingar. When we report this to the Law Society they threatened to block my emails. This tactic was also implemented by Denis Naughton TD and Robert Troy TD, in that they both blocks our tweets.

The matter has been reported to An Garda Siochana, and we await hearing back. We have been advised to prepare Grounding affidavits against both solicitors Tony Henry and Robert Marren to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, however it appears to date that no Solicitor on the island of Ireland is prepared to help prepare same. We have been led to believe that they will not challenge their own, and this fact in itself speaks volumes.

Letter to Marren

Ref: 22942/L/19/7                                                                                           Date: 11/07/2015

Mr. Marren,

Further to the letter my brother Michael Gavin and I received from John Glynn, Solicitor Patrick Hogan & Co. on 9th July 2015 which states

 “I telephoned Mr. Marren today to enquire why I had not received payment on the basis that absolutely everybody else in the Estate has been paid and his response was that he continued to receive letters from you complaining about fees while threatening to go to the Law Society. He said he was not prepared to pay out my fees while these threats existed.”

The letter also states

“it would appear he will not pay out these fees unless you write him and confirm to him that you are not objecting to my fees and direct him to pay same. If you are not prepared to do so, you will leave me with no choice but to proceed to taxation of costs and then subsequently. I will be obliged to sue Mr. Marren for recovery of my fees. This is grossly unfair situation in that Pat is dead almost ten years. I have not been paid for any of my services rendered either to you or to the Estate over that period.”

Our objections to the above are as follows;

We do not consider our reporting you to the Law Society a threat. We have every right to seek justice for the unjust and unfair way we have been dealt with and taken advantage of considering our age, by you the administrator and the beneficiaries of the Estate to the extent that it constitutes ELDER ABUSE.

In the event that the Law Society of Ireland does not accept that our 8 complaints of inadequate professional services, alleged over charging and misconduct, warrant investigation we have every intention of referring this matter to the independent Adjudicator, the solicitors disciplinary tribunal Dublin , An Garda Síochána and the Health Service Executive HSE. Although this whole matter is a source of embarrassment to us, we will have no hesitation in disclosing same in the public domain, as it is our belief that the general public have a right to be made aware of the events that took place and let them judge for themselves based on the true facts.

While we have every intent of pursuing you vigorously to meet our demands to include recovery of the funds not distributed to us to date, we fail to see the logic to your persistent reluctance to pay Patrick Hogan & Co. in isolation to our efforts to seek justice in this matter, or “threats” as you put it.

This is reminiscent of the manner in which you dealt with paying out our 1/6 share from the sale of the Estate lands. Here again despite our persistent requests you Mr. Robert Marren refused to pay out same until finalising the distribution during the Christmas period 2014-2015, without addressing our objections, and it appears you did same to avoid paying our 1/6 share of the land from auction in isolation to the rest of the estate, notwithstanding the fact that the moneys for same were in your possession nearly 2 years previously. You have yet to provide a reasonable explanation of why you did not “bite the bullet” and pay over the full amount when you Mr. Robert Marren received the funds way back on 27th of May 2013.

Do you not recall that I wrote to you on 11th April 2015 and stated “Please advise us of any outstanding bills, has John Glynn, Hogan & Co. been paid to date, and if not why not.”

I believe this should make it clear to you that there is no objection to Patrick Hogan & Co. fee being paid.

In your response on 22nd April you Mr. Marren state “Mr Tony Mclynn was the Solicitor in High Court proceedings on behalf of some of the parties and was awarded his costs by Order of the High Court as was Hogan  & Company.”

Based on your response we felt that the fees to Patrick Hogan & Co. were paid. However if you felt we objected to the fees to Patrick Hogan & Co. why did you not question the issue then.

We have never ever threatened you in any way, and most certainly not in regard to fees to Patrick Hogan & Co.

It would appear to us your reluctance Mr. Marren to paying the fee to Patrick Hogan & Co. in isolation of our “threats” as you put it are just another example of your BULLY BOY TACTICSand we do not appreciate the manner in which you Mr. Marren attempt to force us to concede to your demands by refusing to “pay out Patrick Hogan & Co. fees while these threats exist”.

You may also recall a letter was also sent to your office in Mullingar on 17TH of June 2015 stating the following;

“I take issue with your reluctance to provide a detailed breakdown of how the figure of €40,892.53 representing fees paid to Robert Marren & Co. were arrived at. I also feel I am entitled to a breakdown of all other fees paid out of the Estate funds and who was paid what at closing.

I also take issue with your persistent reluctance to provide the following

  1. Bill of Cost for T & N McLynn, Solicitors, Athlone
  2. Correct invoice for Catherine O’Conner. Her invoice states Total Amount Due €584.25while Cash Account dated 18th July, 2014 “Fees paid to Catherine O’ Connor€6,857.25.
  3. Invoice for William Penrose B.L. or explanation of why his opinion was sought.
  4. Invoice for John Dolan Auctioneer and breakdown of the handsome fee he was paid.
  5. Answer to “has John Glynn, Hogan & Co. Ballinasloe been paid to date, and if not why not”?
  6. Answer to “has John Glynn, Hogan & Co. Ballinasloe been paid to date, and if not why not”?
  7. Any outstanding bills.”

We have yet to receive a response to that letter above which we sent register post notwithstanding the fact that these questions were posed to you in previous correspondencenumerous times prior and regardless we have a right to be furnished with copies of same. You Mr. Robert Marren will note that points 5 and 6 of that letter of 17TH of June 2015, are one in the same and we underlined if not why not”? in an effort to draw your attention to same which apparently you have yet to do.

Why were we not provided with a  Bill of Cost for T & N McLynn, Solicitors, Athlone who we were informed was paid their handsome amount of €38,941.00  approximately a year prior to your finalised distribution during the Christmas period 2014-2015.

When exactly was T & N McLynn, Solicitors, Athlone paid and why were they paid in advance of the finalised distribution while you refused to pay our 1/6 share of the land from auction or fees to Patrick Hogan & Co.??

You did not seek our approval for T & N McLynn, Solicitors bill nor did you request if we objected to same after they represented the other side beneficiaries who put the Estate of my late brother Patrick Gavin to enormous legal expense with their High Court Special Summons where they sought to sell the roof over my head among other things.

“By notices in writing Kathleen ‘OKeefe, and Mary Theresa Harte have confirmed their desire to have the house and lands of the estate sold. Nicholas Duffy and his four children have also confirmed that they desire to have the property sold. It is also the wish of the Plaintiff that the property be sold.”

Bearing in mind that the beneficiaries namely Anne Sanford, Kathleen O’Keefe, Mike Harte, Brenda Harte Waters, Michelle Harte, Philomena Duffy, Patrick Duffy, Catherine Duffy and Noel Duffy and their Solicitor T & N McLynn were well aware that Michael Gavin was entitled to live in the home for the rest of his days per his father’s will which they were all furnished with a copy of. As we recall we were required to attend the high court on 3 separate days, the first of which none of the beneficiaries attended. On the second day we were informed by our barrister Donal Keane B.L. that they were in another room arguing amongst themselves, and then finally we got before the judge on the third day. This is just one of the numerous examples of their vengeful, spiteful behaviour where they squandered the Estate assets. Not to mention the inconvenience, and additional expenses that were incurred to hire a man to mind the “Estate Animals” for 3 days, there was no mention of any funds to cover that cost in your finalised distribution.

On another occasion which we kept you update on, we recall one of the beneficiaries Kathleen O’Keefe rushed us into signing a lease agreement on 27th August, 2014 without providing us an opportunity to read over same carefully or to consider the matter. Consequently we were forced to get legal advice in order to amend a number of the conditions including Michael Gavin’s agreement to “having fully restored the lands to grassland by ploughing and reseeding by no later than the 31st of July 2015.” Lands that were never used for tillage, and even if they were who would commit to a short term 1 year lease with that condition. This appears underhanded to us and highlights the inadequate professional service provided by their Solicitor T&N McLynn, Athlone. It is not of a quality that could reasonably be expected of a solicitor and served no purpose other than to force us to incur additional unnecessary expenses for legal advice to draft letters in response to the lease agreement Kathleen O’Keefe tricked me Michael Gavin into signing.

You have not provided the correct invoice for Catherine O’Conner. Her invoice states Total Amount Due €584.25 while Cash Account dated 18th July, 2014 “Fees paid to Catherine O’ Connor €6,857.25.

You did not seek our approval for seeking William Penrose B.L opinion. No Invoice for William Penrose B.L. or explanation of why his opinion was sought.

You did not seek our approval for John Dolan Auctioneer. No Invoice for John Dolan Auctioneer and breakdown of the fee he was paid was provided to us to date.  As we recall the auctioneer John Dolan did advertise the auction extensively and I recall full and half page ads appeared in the local newspapers.  We would argue that based on the amount of interest and bids made at the auction that these ads served no purpose other than to promote John Dolans Auctioneering service as a whole. To be honest a free mention in the local parish newsletter would have sufficed.

You did not seek our approval for Damien Hannigan & Company Limited Chartered Accountant, Mullingar. Why was he hired against our explicate wishes to oversee the accounts of Catherine O’Conner. He charged in my opinion an excessive fee of €8,751.45 which we consider to be extremely expensive and an unnecessary expense.  Although he was hired to oversee the accounts his fee is in excess of Catherine O’Conner’s fee. John Glynn, Solicitor, Patrick Hogan & Co. did not put the Estate to the additional expense of hiring an additional Accountant so it begs the question why did you?

I fail to understand why you now require me to write you and confirm to you that we are not objecting to Patrick Hogan & Co.  fees and direct you to pay same. I feel this has being dealt with adequately in previous correspondence as above and I fail to understand your logic as to why this is the only bill out of them all that you require us to approve.

It would appear that there is a personal axe to grind between your own good self and John Glynn, Solicitor, Patrick Hogan & Co. and you have no business drawing us into your personal battles between members of your own profession.

In our opinion it would be more befitting of you to write to each of the beneficiaries namely Anne Sanford, Wesley, Mass USA, Kathleen O’Keefe, Glanmire, Cork, Mike Harte,Wesley, Mass USA, Brenda Harte Waters Quincy, Mass USA, Michelle Harte Wesley, Mass USA, Philomena Duffy Mayo, Patrick Duffy, Clare, Catherine Duffy, Monksland, Athlone and Noel Duffy, Athlone, as I have done  and claw back the monies owed to us.

They cannot on the one hand expect to receive the monies from the sale of my late brother Pat Gavin’s livestock together with the gross payments received from the Department of Agriculture, without incurring any expense for the minding, looking after and caring for the animals down through the years.

Catherine O’Conner’s Account Summary 24/02/2012 shows that throughout the entire farming period between 2005 and 2012 the cattle sales came to a figure of €46,589 and the expenses came to a figure of €45,918. Accordingly, the expenses in running the farm were almost equal to the proceeds of sale of livestock. Therefore the profit from the farming operation represented the monies received each year from the Department of Agriculture under the single Payment Scheme, the Disadvantaged Area Scheme and any other Schemes of the Department of Agriculture, less any income tax payable to the state arising out of the farming operation.

We and those we have spoken to in relation to this matter FAIL to see the logic to your reluctance Mr. Robert Marren to see reason in this matter, how do you expect a person to labour for free for 9 years at their own expense and pay vets fees and fodder to fatten cattle so that those THAT DO NOTHING can reap the rewards of the GROSS profits. I Michael Gavin believe with every bone in my body that I am entitled to be paid for the work done and services rendered and monies expended by me in looking after my brother’s livestock from the time my brother died up to the time the animals were sold, this you will appreciate involved the daily herding and looking after the animals to include feeding of the animals in Winter months to include purchase of food stuffs and discharging vets fees etc.

By denying me Michael Gavin a half share in the profits it means that Michael Gavin WAS WORKING FOR NOTHING over the years in question from October, 2005 through to 2013. This is totally unjust and totally unacceptable to us.

We will not accept the present situation which is totally unfair and leaves Michael Gavin without any compensation whatsoever for the time and trouble in looking after the animals on behalf of the estate and also deprives Michael Gavin of any profit he may have earned in the rearing and looking after his own animals.

The detailed breakdown of the net amount €116,789.11 due to Michael Gavin out of the Single Payment Entitlements representing his ½ share in the profits from farming the lands, was  sent to you Mr. Marren, Solicitor, on the 5th of December, 2015 for your consideration. You will note that all that Michael Gavin is looking for is his fair share of the profits in the running of the farm and fair compensation for the work Michael Gavin did in looking after the animals.

It would appear that you Mr. Robert Marren delayed making the decision regarding Michael Gavin’s share in the farming profits and rightful share of the grant monies received from the Department of Agriculture until the very end with the draft distribution account that contained countless errors on 18thSeptember, 2014. Michael Gavin was lied to countless times and led to believe that he would be refunded at closing by some of the beneficiaries. Why did you Mr. Robert Marren make a decision around March 2013 to accept Michael Gavin’s claim to owning half the livestock and all the sheep? But yet for no logical reason refused to award him the net amount €116,789.11 due to Michael Gavin out of the Single Payment Entitlements representing my ½ share in the profits from farming the lands, which was also sent to you on the 5th of December, 2015 for your consideration. There is no good reason why you took advantage of Michael Gavin’s good nature and delayed his decision in this matter until the end.

You would have received a letter from Michael Gavin on 5th December, 2014 stating;

If a fair allowance is not made on an agreed basis, I will not give my consent to any distribution account prepared by you. Similarly, my sisters will also have to agree before a distribution account can be finalised and a distribution effected. Accordingly you as Administrator will be unable to distribute the estate unless you can procure agreement between us and, if this agreement is not forthcoming, I am advised the only way you, as Administrator, can be protected is to go back into Court and get a Court Order directing how the estate can be distributed.

However Mr. Marren you passed the book to us and demanded court proceedings to prevent the distribution in a short space of time over the Christmas period 2014-2015.

We believe that you Mr. Robert Marren should NOT have finalised the distribution without addressing our objections, and it appears you did same to avoid paying our €82,500 1/6 share of the land from action in isolation to the rest of the estate.

While it would appear that these are matters that can only be dealt with by the court if they cannot be resolved by agreement I believe it should be the Administrator who goes back into Court to get a Court Order directing how the estate can be distributed not the ELDERLY BENEFICIARIES.

It would also appear that Mr. Henry of Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone facilitated you Mr. Marren by not phoning  you or writing you immediately as requested by John Glynn Solicitor, (14/01/2015 John Glynn Patrick Hogan & Co. to Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone requesting him to ring and write a short letter to Mr. Marren immediately confirming that he would act in the matter in response to Marren’s threat to effect a distribution of the Estate.) nor did Mr. Henry of Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone inform us, so that we could engage another Solicitor to act on  behalf of Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney.

We have difficulty understanding why Mr. Henry of Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone failed to respond to correspondence, including correspondence that was crucial and significant to us.

At a subsequent meeting with Mr. Henry after your closing he estimated that court proceedings to sue you could take up to 3 years with fees in the region of €60,000 to €100,000, and he suggested that I Michael Gavin should take my age (83) into consideration.

It would appear you allowed confusion to arise in relation to the exact disbursement of funds and showed a complete disregard for the interests of the beneficiaries, whom you, Mr. Robert Marren a Solicitor, knew to be ELDERLY, and by your conduct is depriving two of the ELDERLY beneficiaries, of the enjoyment of their share in the estate. You have also forced Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney to incur additional unnecessary expenses in drafting documents and letters time and time again to prove their claim.

Yours Faithfully

Michael Gavin                                                 Eileen Linney

Support ‪#‎Elderly‬ ‪#‎Roscommon‬ ‪#‎Farmer‬ after you vote

Friday February 26th 10:30 am to 5pm Castle Street ‪#‎Mullingar‬

Join Event https://www.facebook.com/events/167531713593954/

Michael Gavins Petition

  

Petition of Michael Gavin fighting to receive compensation from Solicitor

[your signature]

Share this with your friends:

   

To commit fraud is an offense in Ireland. But the prosecution will depend very much on where you reside on the social scale

We are holding a Peaceful Protest outside Dept of Agriculture Government Buildings Portlaoise Friday March 11th 11am to 3pm
 
The Dept. of Agriculture are facilitating Financial Elder Abuse by handing over the grants to the Solicitor dealing with the estate. The department’s policy is flawed and needs to be changed. The Purpose of the Dept. of Agriculture Grants is to feed the farm animals.
 
Please Read Full Story Here http://wp.me/p6LhQk-bl
 
Posted in News, Solicitors, Victims Tagged with: , , ,

FIRST IT WAS THE GARDAI, THEN IT WAS THE CHARITIES AND NOW THE OLYMPIC COUNCIL IS IN THE DOCK – SO WHO IS NEXT?

real irish

As all of this goes on while we have a sycophantic media covering the rear ends of the untouchables, just imagine what is going on that we are NOT being told.

Revelations in recent years regarding wrongdoing by certain Gardai and greed by certain charity bosses are just two examples of how the mighty are starting to fall from their perches. This week the Olympic Council of Ireland has questions to answer regarding it’s own tickets surfacing on the black market on the streets of Rio de Janeiro.

Twenty years ago it was the Catholic Church which began to fall from it’s lofty perch and it discovered for the first time what it was like to face the wrath of the media and the general public. And while politicians are never far from controversy at any time, the media continue to get off scot free. So who holds the media to account? The Broadcasting Authority and the Press Council are tasked with that job.

Each of those bodies is staffed by broadcasters and journalists. In other words media oversight bodies are no different to the Law Society being the regulatory body and complaints body for those members of the public who are wronged by lawyers and just like the legal profession, the media establishment has no intention of relinquishing such power.

One ugly example of Ireland’s corrupted and corruptible media in full flight are RTE’s legal threats to freelance journalist Gemma O’ Doherty, where the state broadcaster is demanding 13,000 Euros from her because she used 3 minutes of RTE film archive for her documentary ‘Mary Boyle, the Untold Story’. This is a clear measure of just how petty RTE is but they are not alone. The print media, together with Dennis O’Brien’s print media and broadcasting empire are every bit as bad.

The National Union of Journalists deserves a flash picket by hundreds of angry people who have had enough of media bias, corruption and lies. Their offices are in the middle of Dublin, on Store Street, conveniently around the corner from Uncle Dennis’s Independent House and a few doors from Store Street Garda Station. It is a gated entrance. It is imperative that these liars and leeches get what the Catholic Church believed was the impossible in the 1990s. A similar protest at RTE’s Montrose studios (pictured) is a more difficult task as it is impossible to get through their security system.

Posted in The Real Irish Media - Can you handle the truth?

Law Society of Ireland will Not Intervene for Elderly Michael Gavin against Peter D Jones State Solicitor for Robert Marren Mullingar

lawSociety-MikeGavin-09-08-2016

 

July 26th 2016 Elderly 84 Year old Michael Gavin 

Complaind to Law Society of Ireland re Peter D Penalty Points Jones

On 01/04/2016 peter d penalty points jones State Solicitor sent me Michael Gavin an Elderly 84 Year Old retired farmer and former CIE employee a threatening letter on behalf of his client robert b. marren Mullingar.

I am outraged at the reluctance of peter d. jones to respond to my letter send back to him on 12th of April 2016 in which I requested 7 pieces of evidence and answers to 20 questions concerning his client robert b. marren.

Copy of both letters enclosed

I demand that this matter be investigated and a response to my correspondence.

Thursday, 21 July 2016

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle:  call Deputy Clare Daly, who has five minutes.

Deputy Clare Daly: I am just in the nick of time. After years of delay and fierce resistance from the bodies this legislation is supposed to regulate, and a rewriting of that legislation largely by the bodies, we have finally got to the point of appointing members to the board of the new legal services regulatory authority. Some change is desperately needed and I welcome that fact. To be honest, the role played by the Law Society over the past period has demonstrated it to be an organisation that is absolutely not fit for purpose. It is as bad, if not worse, as all the other organisations that have been set up to regulate and investigate themselves.

Even with the best people in the world, that type of system would not work but we know there is a litany of disaster when we consider the Law Society’s history. The idea that the Law Society would operate as both a representative and a regulatory body for solicitors is dysfunctional and unacceptable. The new Act from which the body is being set up removes some of the regulatory functions from the Law Society but I argue it is certainly not enough. I am not happy with the amount of power that the Law Society is keeping because of its historic activity. I will deal with one or two cases, and I assure the Leas-Cheann Comhairle that where I mention names, they are in the public domain and have been the subject of court cases. They are beyond dispute.

People like Mr. Fergus Appelbe are well known. He is a former solicitor, currently practising under supervision, and he was the subject of two “Today Tonight” investigations in the late 1980s because of his conduct. He was ultimately convicted of fraud. The hole left in accounts by this individual and his various companies amount to somewhere between €100 million and €200 million, and that hole will probably have to be filled by the Irish taxpayer, as the Minister of State knows. He is not allowed to be a company director in the North but he has been allowed to continue to practice under supervision here. The Law Society failed utterly to investigate the large and countless claims against him. It protected him and appointed him to its conveyancing committee.

An individual who complained about this gentleman was Mr. Colm Murphy. Probably as a result of those complaints – in retaliation, in effect – a process was embarked upon, supported by the Law Society, which saw Mr. Murphy struck off, allegedly for breaching an undertaking he had given in the High Court. A solicitor for the Law Society, Ms Linda Kirwan, swore in an affidavit that she had witnessed him giving this undertaking. After Mr. Murphy was struck off, she acknowledged that she had not even been in court on the day in which the alleged undertaking was given. Not only that but there is no record of any such undertaking anyway. Nevertheless, Ms Kirwan is now head of complaints and client relations at the Law Society and was recently elected by the society to represent complaint handler members on the executive committee, despite her admitting to filing a false affidavit. That is incredibly worrying.

We also know the documentation relied upon to strike off Mr. Murphy was a forged document presented by an individual called Mr. Frank Fallon, who subsequently received a seven-year jail term for fraud and forgery. It was alleged and ultimately proven that the document presented in the Murphy case was a forgery and there is evidence to suggest the Law Society was well aware of this but pursued this individual anyway.

The point is in this case and others, the Law Society’s barristers and external solicitors have deliberately misled the courts. I am not saying it lightly as these are facts. It was done to prevent this individual, Mr. Murphy, from getting a full hearing and redress in his case. Mr. Justice Nicholas Kearns in the case spoke about repeated “skullduggery” on the part of the Law Society. The problem I have is that the Law Society has been unaccountable and a law unto itself. It decided to go after this individual but it did not decide to go after many others whose actions will cost the taxpayer dear. The unchecked role of the Law Society is something that should have been challenged before now. I am not happy to say this goes far enough and I am not happy with the role of the nominees being put forward in the process. I am glad the new authority is finally being set up, although it is not as robust or independent as I would like.

#peterdjones

#robertbmarren

#LawSocietyIreland

Posted in News Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,

ALL LAWS FOR US, NO LAWS FOR THEM!

the gavel of a judge in court. lies on a desk.

the gavel of a judge in court. lies on a desk.

How many times have you despondently used the term “one law for them and another law for the rest of us”? Those of us who are awake in Ireland are sick to the teeth of watching justice being subverted by the very people who are meant to make justice, administer justice and enforce justice.

We have witnessed ridiculously lenient sentences given to bankers for billion euro fraud which bankrupted our nation, where a judge stated that prison would be a very upsetting experience for such bankers and only two weeks ago, another 3 banking criminals were sent to the cushy semi open prison at Mountjoy’s Training Unit only hours into their 2 and 3 year sentences. Not even a prisoner beginning a 3 month sentence for non payment of fines would have such luck. We are sick to the teeth of learning about penalty points being unlawfully removed for judges, TDs, state solicitors, well connected wealthy people, corrupt journalists and sainted celebrities. When a journalist attempted to write an article in the public interest highlighting a serving Garda Commissioner having penalty points removed, she was promptly dismissed from her long serving employment. This is just a taste of what corruption is like in Ireland and it has now reached dangerous totalitarian levels.

But the time for talking is now over. The time for ‘giving out’ down in the pub has long past. The time for shrugging our shoulders with defeatist phrases of “ah well sure what can we do?” is certainly long past it’s sell by date and the time for writing silly, meaningless and grumpy letters to the Irish Times is now gone forever. THE TIME FOR DIRECT ACTION IS NOW!

As a result of the state’s criminally corrupt actions against a number of people in different parts of Ireland in recent and not so recent times, this organisation ‘ACT – Anti Corruption Taskforce’ has emerged. There are now a rapidly growing number of people throughout this land who are no longer prepared to shrug their shoulders and allow criminals masquerading as lawyers, politicians, judges, Gardai or other senior civil servants to run roughshod over the ordinary people of Ireland. We mean business this time and here is why.

There will be no more silent assemblies outside Leinster House in the downpours of rain, while the political establishment laugh their heads off at us while they stagger around the subsidised Dail Bar. THIS TIME WE WILL TURN UP AT THE HOMES OF CORRUPT POLITICIANS AND SEE IF THEY LAUGH THEN?

There will be no more complaints to the Law Society, which means being driven around in circles for 5 and 10years while they laugh their heads off at us at the annual Rotary Club dinner. THIS TIME WE WILL TURN UP AT THE HOMES OF CORRUPT LAWYERS AND JUDGES AND SEE IF THEY LAUGH THEN.

There will be no more complaints to the Garda Siochana Ombudsman Commission (GSOC) where such complaints will be the subject of practical office jokes in the company of Paul Williams at the Garda annual dinner. THIS TIME WE WILL TURN UP AT THE HOMES OF CORRUPT SENIOR GARDAI AND SEE IF THEY LAUGH THEN.

There will be no more complaints to the Press Council or the Broadcasting Complaints Authority, where such complaints will ignite rapturous laughter and sneering from the likes of Mick Clifford and Miriam O’ Callaghan. THIS TIME WE WILL TURN UP AT THE HOMES OF CORRUPT JOURNALISTS AND BROADCASTERS AND SEE IF THEY LAUGH THEN.

There will be no more controlled opposition style protests and marches against the corruption which is destroying our nation’s spirit, because that is what the corrupt establishment want us to do and that is why they are having a laugh at us the ordinary people of Ireland. Instead, WE WILL TURN UP AT THE HOMES OF THOSE CORRUPT IN SOCIETY AND SEE IF THEY LAUGH THEN.

If you want to be involved in a hands-on approach to fighting corruption in our society please join with us. We meet each Saturday in Athlone, Co. Westmeath for the purposes of planning strategy and we intend taking that fight against corruption to a higher level than what was ever attempted before. There will be regular actions undertaken over the next few months, all of which will be lawful, legal but effective. We need to get the word out that some of the most powerful people in our society, those who make decisions that affect our every day lives, are corrupt to the core and are nothing less than criminals.

If you want to do your bit to help end the situation of “ONE LAW FOR THEM AND ONE LAW FOR US” then please share this post far and wide and join with us at ACT – Anti Corruption Taskforce.

Thank you.

Posted in News, Niall Doyle Tagged with: , , ,

Why Peaceful Rosary Procession to Robber Marrens Home Sunday August 14th 2pm – 4pm

RosaryProtest

Peaceful Rosary Procession

Congregate at Entrance to Ballyglass Cementary before 2 pm Sunday August 14th
Join Peaceful Rosary Procession to Robert Marren Solicitors Home a few hundred yards down the Longford Road.
  1. Robert Marren Solicitor refused to award Michael Gavin the grant money’s paid down from the Dept. of Agriculture. Michael is owed over €116,000 for 9 years minding the farm Animals.
  1. Robert Marren Solicitor held onto the funds from the land sale for nearly 2 years, and then finally awarded to Michael Gavin and his sister €12,500 plus interest less than what we were each entitled to.
  1. Willie Penrose TD BL was not paid for his opinion, when the estate was charged for same.
  1. Robert Marren Solicitor Squandered the estate assets and hired an additional accountant at a cost of €8,751.45.
  1. Marren did not provide a “detailed bill of costs” for his fee of €40,892.53 he awarded to himself.
  1. No bill of costs was provided for T & N McLynn Solicitors, Athlone, paid an amount of €38,941 a year prior to closing.
  1. Tony Henry, Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone failed to undertake the instructions given him through John Glynn Solicitors to prevent Mr. Robert Marren closing in isolation to well founded objections.
  2. Now Peter D. Jones Mulingar State Solicitor THREATENED Elderly Michael Gavin NOT to Peaceful Protest outside Robert Marren Solicitors Office.

To commit fraud is an offense in Ireland. But the prosecution will depend very much on where you reside on the social scale

The Fifteen Promises of the Virgin Mary to those who recite the Rosary
1. Whoever shall faithfully serve me by the recitation of the Rosary, shall receive signal graces.
2. I promise my special protection and the greatest graces to all those who shall recite the Rosary.
3. The Rosary shall be a powerful armor against hell, it will destroy vice, decrease sin, and defeat heresies.
4. It will cause virtue and good works to flourish; it will obtain for souls the abundant mercy of God; it will withdraw the hearts of people from the love of the world and its vanities, and will lift them to the desire of eternal things. Oh, that souls would sanctify themselves by this means.
5. The soul which recommends itself to me by the recitation of the Rosary, shall not perish.
6. Whoever shall recite the Rosary devoutly, applying himself to the consideration of its Sacred Mysteries shall never be conquered by misfortune. God will not chastise him in His justice, he shall not perish by an unprovided death; if he be just, he shall remain in the grace of God, and become worthy of eternal life.
7. Whoever shall have a true devotion for the Rosary shall not die without the Sacraments of the Church.
8. Those who are faithful to recite the Rosary shall have during their life and at their death the light of God and the plentitude of His graces; at the moment of death they shall participate in the merits of the Saints in Paradise.
9. I shall deliver from purgatory those who have been devoted to the Rosary.
10. The faithful children of the Rosary shall merit a high degree of glory in Heaven.
11. You shall obtain all you ask of me by the recitation of the Rosary.
12. All those who propagate the Holy Rosary shall be aided by me in their necessities.
13. I have obtained from my Divine Son that all the advocates of the Rosary shall have for intercessors the entire celestial court during their life and at the hour of death.
14. All who recite the Rosary are my children, and brothers and sisters of my only Son, Jesus Christ.
15. Devotion of my Rosary is a great sign of predestination.
Posted in News, Protests, Solicitors Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

France Should Protect Her Own Citizens, Inside Her Own Borders, From Her Own Terrorists, Instead Of Interfering In Irish Legal Affairs!

ian bailey

French prosecutors should not be doing the bidding of Western Europe’s most corrupt police force. . . . . . . . . .

Collusion between senior Gardai and belligerent French prosecutors cannot be ruled out in order to divert attention away from the Mary Boyle and Philip Cairns cover ups. In this the centenary of the 1916 Rising, one would assume that we had become familiar with so called independence, sovereignty and freedom to operate our own legislation, however flawed such legislation may be. But alas we have not.

Because we are justifiably perceived as the EU’s greatest little obedient servants, we in Ireland have invited dictats and threats from any rogue element in any other jurisdiction whenever such rogues so please and there is no better example of that than this week’s interference in our justice system by the French Prosecution Service regarding Ian Bailey.

Ian Bailey was arrested and questioned a number of times in relation to the 1996 murder of Sophie Toscan du Plantier in West Cork but never charged, despite criminal Gardai forcing a woman to make a false statement, a false statement which in could have landed Bailey a life sentence. But insufficient evidence meant that the DPP decided it could not prosecute, much to the annoyance of the criminal Gardai who, by hook or by crook, wanted Bailey’s conviction for the murder (no Garda was ever disciplined, dismissed or prosecuted for this perversion of the course of justice).

So enter the French Prosecution Service. It is highly irregular for a country, especially a fellow EU member, to seek to prosecute a crime which occurred in another EU member state, but apparently there is EU legislation that covers this eventuality. But firstly a suspect must be extradited. Despite the might of France’s prosecutors and lawyers, Ireland’s Supreme Court, after careful consideration, ruled against the extradition 4 years ago. So that was that then. End of story except that Ireland’s might and money ensured that Bailey was NOT going to win his case against the state for infringement of his human rights or liberty.

This week the rogue French Prosecution Service has renewed it’s pursuit of Ian Bailey. Is it not a coincidence, that this new attempt to make a news story out of an old issue comes at a time when French law enforcement and security is in the dock over the terror attacks of the past 18 months and the Irish justice system and law enforcement is in the dock over the disappearance of two children Mary Boyle and Philip Cairns?

This new development smacks of collusion and in the words of Bailey’s solicitor Frank Buttimer it is a mockery of justice.

Posted in The Real Irish Media - Can you handle the truth? Tagged with: ,

Judge Pat McCartan You Are Now A Far Cry From Your Bleeding Hearted, Cultural Marxist, Social Justice Warrior Days, Your Lordship

PatMcCartan

 

Pat McCartan should be impeached IMMEDIATELY!!!!

If ever there were grounds for impeachment of a member of the Irish Judiciary then Judge Patrick McCartan should be gone yesterday. He was ‘appointed’ to the bench by his cronies in the Democartic Left Party, aka New Agenda, aka The Workers Party, aka Sinn Fein The Workers Party, aka Official Sinn Fein and in reality ALWAYS known as the Official IRA.

Pat McCartan kept the company of organised gangsters and armed criminals during the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. Not a very suitable person to be a Circuit Court Judge one would assume. So what does this say about the whole judicial appointments system? It says that regardless of how much of a thug you are, once you are in the right political party at the right time then your chances of landing that powerful position of Judge is enhanced greatly.

McCartan’s appointment to the bench was made by his party leader Pionsious De Rossa, Labour leader Dick Spring and then Taoiseach John Bruton in 1997, a few months before the pro North Korean party knew they would be almost wiped out in the general election.

When this man can preside over a civil matter that was maliciously turned into a criminal matter with relish, influence the jury at each and every opportunity and then remand the convicted man on bail despite no objections from the DPP and then hand down a 5 year sentence, then we know our judiciary are out of control.

All Sean Carraher did was post certain matters about a Garda Sergeant on line and while Sergeant Collins of Shankill Garda may argue that such postings were untrue, those on the outside looking in could not find any evidence of untruths. This was a civil case plain and simple, but when Sergeant Collins discovered Carraher had no money and he could not sue for compo, he had no problem getting his criminally corrupt cronies in the DPP’s office to instigate criminal proceedings.

A quarter of a century could not change a politician so physically and mentally as this serpent. The sooner these rogue judges are outed and ran from their perches the better for all in our society. Pat McCartan (pictured when a TD) was a wolf in sheep’s clothing even then. The day when a bloody peoples revolution with those leeches being culled cannot arrive soon enough.

Posted in The Real Irish Media - Can you handle the truth? Tagged with: ,

Jim O’ Callaghan Future Justice Minister Is Just Right For The Job – Because He Is Corrupt To The Core:

Jim O' Callaghan

Jim O’ Callaghan Future Justice Minister Is Just Right For The Job – Because He Is Corrupt To The Core

Jim O’ Callaghan, brother of RTE’s Miriam O’ Callaghan and Fianna Fail’s spokesperson on Justice, has categorically denied that anyone in Fianna Fail ever contacted Ballyshannon Garda Station in 1977 to interfere in the investigation into the disappearance of 6 year old Mary Boyle. So why is Mr. O’ Callaghan so certain?

How can he come to such a definitive conclusion? He was only 9 years old at the time himself, so who in Fianna Fail has subsequently told him that nobody in Fianna Fail ever interfered in that Garda investigation?

People who are fans of the famous sitcom ‘Only Fools And Horses” may recall an incident where Rodney brought a date home for a nightcap. The problem was his date was a police woman and his family’s flat was full of stolen goods . Out of polite conversation she asked Del Boy and Grandad what they were doing earlier in the evening. Both spontaneously proclaimed that they were in all evening and Grandad added “and we have witnesses to prove it”. His autocue of guilt could not have been more hilarious.

This automatic circling of the wagons by people in the employ of this rogue state is now becoming all too predictable. When Jim O’ Callaghan can confidently claim, unsolicited, that there was no Fianna Fail interference in that murder investigation he has effectively admitted that there WAS such interference. But by doing so, he has aroused the suspicions of many people.

When a barrister such as him, trained to tell lies to judges and juries, comes out with such a sweeping assertion about an event which occurred when he was still in primary school then we must be suspicious. O’ Callaghan, a proud member of one of Western Europe’s most criminally corrupt political parties stands to automatically become a Justice Minister in a future Fianna Fail lead government. If he fails to get elected but his party wins power, he will automatically be appointed to the bench.

O’ Callaghan has now involved himself in a murder cover up. He is protecting those who are murderers and those who are perverting the course of justice. So there we have it. Politics, Law, Justice and Media all drawing it’s people from the same gene pool. Is it any wonder there is such little confidence in the Judiciary and Justice systems when a blackguard of a lawyer/politician is at large in our society.

His constituency office is at 37, South Richmond Street, Portobello, Dublin 2, tel. 01 4758943 for those who wish to express their anger at his most recent defence of the Fianna Fail criminal realm. Details of his home address at Rathmines, Dublin 6 are not so readily available.

Posted in The Real Irish Media - Can you handle the truth? Tagged with: ,

Garda Whistleblowers and innocent people being framed and intimidated by Top Gardai for exposing corruption

garda-whistleblowers

Garda Whistleblowers and innocent people being framed and intimidated by Top Gardai for exposing corruption

http://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/garda-whistle-blower-claims-suffered-7192798

Gardai who whistle blow on corruption, sexual assaults involving senior gardai and the justice department are being intimidated , harassed, bullied, falsely arrested, falsely accused of trumped up charges by High Ranking Officers, so as to ruin their reputation and make people believe they are criminals, when in fact its the high ranking officers that are corrupt. Hundreds of gardai are suffering appalling intimidation at the hands of these high ranking political appointed bullies.These whistle blowers are being forced to retire, resign, take a care break etc

Senior gardai get NBCI to investigate and stitch up the members who are whistle blowing so as to drive them over the edge and drop their complaints of corruption. More then 20 gardai/sergeants have reported corruption and have been bullied and intimidated so badly, some even contemplated suicide.

Below a few recent bullying cases all of them covered up by the justice departments

Garda Whistle blower who reported a murder abused while senior gardai cover it up

http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/daly-tells-dail-of-garda-ordered-to-claim-he-did-not-witness-shooting-671968.html

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/gardai-covered-up-murder-of-civilian-by-member-of-force-claims-independent-td-31146559.html

https://www.sundayworld.com/news/gardai-covered-up-murder-of-civilian-by-member-of-the-force-says-td

Whistle blower assaulted and falsely imprisoned by Ass Comm Derek Byrne

http://www.rabble.ie/2014/02/18/silencing-the-garda-whistleblowers/

Gardai have no where to turn to, to report sexual assaults, harassment by corrupt senior gardai, their last resort is to send letters and emails around.

A witch hunt was set up by NBCI and senior gardai to catch the gardai who were reporting the true corruption being committed by commissioner Fintan Fanning , Derek Byrne and John O Mahoney.

http://www.sundayworld.com/news/crimedesk/poison-pen-letter-rocks-garda-siochana

A number of gardai have committed suicide as a result of senior garda bullying and it is not getting any better for garda whistle blowers. The continued abuse of garda whistle blowers has to stop by corrupt political appointed senior gardai.

Garda whistle blower John Wilson

http://www.rte.ie/radio1/doconone/2014/0110/647599-documentary-podcast-garda-limped-whistleblower-john-wilson/

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/gardai-took-action-against-us-because-we-spoke-out-say-whistleblowers-255832.html

http://www.northernsound.ie/news/claims-that-judge-pressured-whistleblower-to-drop-complaint/

https://soundcloud.com/oceanfm/i-have-no-regrets-garda-whistleblower-john-wilson-nwt-tues-10th-nov?utm_source=soundcloud&utm_campaign=wtshare&utm_medium=Twitter&utm_content=https%3A%2F%2Fsoundcloud.com%2Foceanfm%2Fi-have-no-regrets-garda-whistleblower-john-wilson-nwt-tues-10th-nov

Every garda and sergeant that reported senior garda corruption to Oliver Connelly was warned off or ignored and then isolated and bullied/intimidated/harassed on the orders of senior garda management.

“John Wilson said he made a formal complaint on April 4th, 2012 to the then confidential recipient, Oliver Connolly, but he received no response” ignored just like a numerous other gardai.

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/john-wilson-found-high-number-of-pulse-entries-on-ian-bailey-1.2041434

http://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/crime/whistleblower-john-wilson-reveals-hes-3412696

http://www.thejournal.ie/garda-whisteblower-john-wilson-allegations-corruption-1413664-Apr2014/

http://www.herald.ie/news/gardai-got-rid-of-100k-penalty-points-for-pals-28963540.html

“Don’t forget my proximity to the minister, and don’t think I didn’t have a word in his ear.”

He said Mr Connolly told her to “play the political game and she might get preferential treatment elsewhere”.
http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/garda-warned-to-drop-her-sex-attack-complaint-260225.html

Whistle blower Garda Keith Harrison

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/high-court/garda-whistleblower-claims-disciplinary-inquiry-malicious-1.2038725

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/new-garda-whistleblower-claims-drinkdrive-coverup-30278877.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rtBuKzDtmM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUUNX9wIC0k

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/garda-inquiries-were-an-insult-to-whistleblowers-td-says-1.2334231

https://www.rte.ie/news/2015/0830/724497-garda-internal-inquiry/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drv5ZDtyN-8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlwbCq51LfY

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/garda-sexual-harassment-claims-investigated-by-force-369164.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApCNE0puIG0

http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/ireland/article1644634.ece?CMP=OTH-gnws-standard-2015_12_12

http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/ireland/article1641711.ece

“refusing to co-operate and would not supply documents he was looking for, or comply with his requests”.

Management needs reform

http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/recommendations-to-be-made-regarding-the-management-of-an-garda-siochana-709997.html

Whistle blower Garda Nicky Keogh

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/flanagan-claims-whistleblower-links-high-ranking-gardai-to-heroin-dealing-268000.html

http://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/politics/mick-wallace-garda-whistleblower-being-4701691

Sergeant whistle blower Michael Buckley

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/gardai-face-probe-over-allowances-29821078.html

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/probe-into-fraudulent-pay-claims-by-gardai-252070.html

http://www.thejournal.ie/gardai-overtime-1211823-Dec2013/

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/cold-case-unit-garda-gets-injunction-blocking-transfer-29208727.html

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/woman-admits-sending-valentine-s-card-and-g-string-to-garda-1.1924464

Sergeant whistle blower Christopher Power

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/garda-i-was-bullied-after-exposing-phonetape-abuse-30147067.html

Sergeant whistle blower Maurice Mc Cabe

http://www.irishexaminer.com/viewpoints/columnists/michael-clifford/maurice-mccabes-noble-attempt-to-police-gardai-256419.html

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/whistle-blower-harassed-by-fellow-gardai-265174.html

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/mccabe-gardai-falsified-hundreds-of-crime-records-266638.html

http://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/garda-whistleblower-maurice-mccabe-makes-3496288

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/garda-whistleblower-destroyed-29944120.html

http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/gardai-are-allegedly-illegally-wiping-penalty-points-from-their-work-and-personal-cars-711631.html

Garda whistle blowers who reported more illegal phone Taps

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/ex-gardaiacute-claim-they-saw-bugging-315445.html

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/garda-commissioner-noirin-osullivan-sends-bugging-allegations-to-gsoc-31031531.html

http://www.thejournal.ie/state-surveillance-ireland-gardai-wiretapping-email-monitoring-gardai-2099537-May2015/

http://www.thejournal.ie/ireland-state-surveillance-wiretapping-gardai-crime-transparency-2105584-May2015/

GSOC Bugged by senior gardai

http://www.irishexaminer.com/viewpoints/analysis/gsoc-controversy-highlights-the-joke-of-a-democratic-ireland-258710.html

http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/ombudsman-investigates-claim-that-gardai-sought-sunday-world-reporters-phone-records-626137.html

Garda whistle blower John Kelly

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/supreme-court-overturns-gardas-dismissal-248647.html

Garda whistle blower William Browne

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/leading-garda-awarded-85000-damages-after-intimidation-and-harassment-28943262.html

Garda whistle blower Jack Doyle

http://www.irishexaminer.com/election2014/election2014-news/whistleblower-senior-garda-beefed-up-finds-268885.html

http://www.missingpersons-ireland.freepress-freespeech.com/primetimeonurlingforddrugs.html

http://www.rabble.ie/2014/05/16/serpico/

Garda whistle blower Andrea Fitzharris

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-288575327.html

Garda Whistle blower Christine Kehoe

http://www.wexfordpeople.ie/news/former-wexford-garda-brings-bullying-case-to-the-high-court-27709132.html

Garda whistle blower Kieran Jackson

http://www.donegaldemocrat.ie/news/donegal-news/former-garda-claims-dismissed-superintendent-bullied-him-1-2004797

http://www.derryjournal.com/news/garda-claims-bullied-and-harassed-by-senior-officer-1-2146058

Garda whistle blowers reported embezzlement

http://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/two-gardai-embezzled-hundreds-thousands-5113437

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/oireachtas/clare-daly-alleges-garda-embezzlement-case-not-investigated-1.2093184

A number of female Gardai/sergeants whistle blowers e.g Mary T O Connor, reported false arrests, corruption, sexual assaults,perjury, forgeries, fraud,destruction of evidence, theft, perverting the course of justice and conspiracy within the justice departments, all by senior garda officers and DPP officials.

http://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/garda-whistle-blower-claims-suffered-7192798

Sergeant whistle blower E. Doherty

She wrote to the confidential recipient and TD s reporting serious garda corruption and fraud by senior garda management and instead of investigating them they raided her house. This witch hunt against her as with all garda whistle blowers, by Top senior management has been going for years. While falsely accusing her of harassment .

Dublin Garda Roisin Farrell

Reported bullying, harassment and intimidation, she had a number of miscarriages as a result of it, she
was paid off by senior garda management and resigned on medical grounds.

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/whistleblowers-garda-warned-off-pursuing-claim-of-sexual-harassment-260251.html

http://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/dail-hears-female-cop-told-3187770

http://wellbeingfoundation.com/bgarda.html

Garda whistle blower Maire O Reilly

https://thepeninsulairelandblog.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/behaviour-in-tribunals-an-garda-siochana-v-ms-marie-oreilly/

http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/garda-quits-force-because-of-bullying-campaign-235653.html

http://article.wn.com/view/2006/05/14/Garda_claims_he_was_bullied/

Garda whistle blowers in Athlone

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/oireachtas/serious-garda-malpractice-in-athlone-claims-td-mick-wallace-1.2160333

Garda whistle blower

http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/mick-wallace-claims-fg-backbencher-has-penalty-points-quashed-669835.html

This is what corrupt senior gardai cause and get away with it

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/ombudsman-probes-suicide-of-young-garda-26674123.html ;

“Garda Brian Canavan, stationed at Pearse Street in Dublin, was suspended from duty on May 23, 2014, for allegedly failing to prosecute cases in 2012 and 2013, two days after he had informed a Garda Inspector he wished initiate a grievance procedure against two other superior officers.”

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/garda-under-investigation-suspended-from-duty-two-days-after-indicating-he-wanted-to-make-complaint-against-superiors-court-hears-34183814.html

Joe Doocey and others like Ian Bailey,Pascal Dolan, Stephen Manning, Mc Brearties Stephen Kerr, Cathriona Barker, John McDonald intimidated , harassed, bullied, falsely arrested, falsely imprisoned by corrupt detectives from NBCI Harcourt square for exposing corruption in the justice departments.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1ELHruY7hg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVH678HEQTc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p848CPN0VWs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GJdxegjtM8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLecGywCcpU&spfreload=10

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntdyh3CL25o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPM7eT16-wM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOrKZSEIgIk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVC6OSi2VW0

http://www.thejournal.ie/teenager-whipped-1464799-May2014/

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=425_1434573501&comments=1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXZttLqEehI

www.irishinjustice.com

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/11m-in-payouts-for-55-victims-of-donegal-garda-corruption-26469346.html

https://thepressnet.com/2015/03/19/allegations-of-police-brutality-made-by-dr-richard-oflaherty/ ;

“Ian Bailey considered suicide after arrest over murder”
“High Court hears claim death threat made to journalist by
Garda as he was driven to station”

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/ian-bailey-considered-suicide-after-arrest-over-murder-1.1990707

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/high-court/farrell-says-garda-asked-her-to-accuse-ian-bailey-of-harassment-1.2025602

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/high-court/marie-farrell-family-left-schull-after-garda-bullied-children-1.2027087

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/oireachtas/wallace-in-new-claims-of-garda-harassment-over-kilkenny-pub-1.1950976

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/high-court/farrell-says-garda-asked-her-to-accuse-ian-bailey-of-harassment-1.2025602

http://irishinjustice.com/index.htm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB5wCjL-Sl8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sizTnK4MGig

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/mick-wallace-claims-garda%C3%AD-involved-in-drugs-trade-1.2034029

http://www.indymedia.ie/article/104668

http://www.swp.ie/content/new-garda-allegations-expose-rotten-system

https://foolscrow.wordpress.com/2010/07/22/cops-charge-irish-government-with-treason/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=58&v=B5ItE4B5rWQ

Hundreds of people assaulted, raped and abused while in Garda custody even a young disabled boy

http://www.thejournal.ie/teenager-whipped-1464799-May2014/

http://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/health-news/outrage-politicians-hear-special-needs-3540134

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3K1ZTnszNY

http://www.indymedia.ie/article/104668

http://www.swp.ie/content/new-garda-allegations-expose-rotten-system

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZ4_TZQTj3Y

http://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/brendan-smyth-victims-to-take-gardai-to-court-683754.html

http://www.thejournal.ie/gsoc-garda-rape-2212171-Jul2015/

Senior gardai Commissioner Derek Byrne, John O Mahony and Fintan Fanning try to shut gardai up, with assaults, intimidation, harassment, bullying and ruining their character by reporting a false allegation to their drinking buddy journalist Paul Williams to publish.

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/end-leaks-to-media-judge-tells-gardai-317684.html

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/graham-dwyer-trail-information-was-leaked-like-a-sieve-by-gardaiacute-318372.html

http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/dwyer-defence-claims-gardai-were-leaking-like-a-sieve-667433.html

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/bailey-asks-for-garda-malice-documents-224717.html

http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/2005/en/act/pub/0020/sec0062.html

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/judge-received-garda-leaks-on-private-citizens-30136859.html

Nothing has changed in 10 years for whistle blowers

http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/garda-corruption-laws-useless-says-whistleblower-316065.html

Corruption at the Top being ignored because they are all political appointments

http://www.anarkismo.net/article/1006

http://www.irishexaminer.com/viewpoints/columnists/michael-clifford/strange-tale-of-shatter-and-whistleblower-258830.html

http://www.indymedia.ie/article/75873

http://article.wn.com/view/2006/05/14/Garda_claims_he_was_bullied/

Gardai have no where to turn to, to report corrupt senior gardai, their last resort is to send letters and emails around.
A witch hunt was set up by NBCI and senior gardai to catch the gardai who were reporting the true corruption being committed by commissioner Fintan Fanning , Derek Byrne and John O Mahoney.

http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/garda-quits-force-because-of-bullying-campaign-235653.html

How whistle blowers are treated by this corrupt justice system

http://www.tv3.ie/3player/show/276/90644/1/Specials

The area of procurement corruption in AGS is so rotten with cronyism, its unbelievable, this is just one there are hundreds
of cases like this in the same situation.

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/translation-service-brings-legal-action-against-garda-commisioners-after-interpreter-contract-awarded-to-rivals-31138930.html

The People of Ireland and whistle blowers need a public inquiry into corruption .
Every serving, retired,gardai on career breaks, resigned and suspended Garda member needs to be asked to talk about the corruption that is epidemic in the force, but it needs to be totally independent of senior gardai.

https://justiceforpanelreviewvictims.wordpress.com/2015/02/14/a-number-of-gardai-have-committed-suicide-as-a-result-of-senior-garda-bullying-and-it-is-not-getting-any-better-for-garda-whistle-blowers-please-share-and-help-expose-this/

No reform for senior gardai who are corrupt they are just moved to another area, just like the priests that were moved. Corruption continues in the top ranks of the garda force.

http://www.villagemagazine.ie/index.php/2015/04/get-on-with-it/

How many more suicides does this justice system want on its hands?

http://awaken-longford.com/2015/07/30/i-believe-the-irish-public-have-shown-huge-restraint-in-the-face-of-all-this-hypocrisy-letter-to-the-irish-times/

“Six people in the gardaí have died by suicide in the past 12 months alone.”

https://www.thejournal.ie/gardai-pay-and-conditions-2547557-Jan2016/

https://goodpointsite.wordpress.com/articles/d-ring-block/

Whistleblower

Garda Whistleblowers and innocent people being framed and intimidated by Top Gardai for exposing corruption :

Posted in News

CrookedLawyers – John Gill on his controversial conversation with Mayo State Solicitor Seamus Hughes

crookedLawyers

CrookedLawyers – John Gill on his controversial conversation with Mayo State Solicitor Seamus Hughes, the new proposals to abolish the office of the Taxing Master, and the new global coalition Transparency International.

There is a growing fear among Solicitors and Barristers that the holiday period they have enjoyed over these many years is drawing to an end. A holiday period that was steeped in corruption, collusion, deception, perjury, and maintained by threat and intimidation.

This holiday period in case you are under any illusions is far from over; there are many thousands of individuals and families all over the 26 counties of Ireland today with the threat of large bills of costs and the fear of going to jail hanging over them.

You no longer need to read the report of the chairman of the Bar Council’s trip to Zimbabwe; just see the research that is ongoing by the Victims of Irish Solicitors for the past six years at Drumline, Newmarket-on-Fergus, Co. Clare.

While in Dublin on Thursday the 5th of January 2006, I picked up a message from the State Solicitor for Co. Mayo in Westport – at the time, I was just asked to contact Seamus Hughes. So I phoned the next day to discover that it was an office. I was told that Seamus Hughes would phone me back later. Seamus did phone back later, but I was still in Dublin meeting with victims of corrupt solicitors.

On my return to the office of the VLPS in Co. Clare, I was told to make contact with Seamus Hughes. I returned the call to 098 28422 at 9:50 a.m. on Monday morning, the 9th of January. When I introduced myself, Mr Hughes offered to phone me back, which he did.

Seamus Hughes seemed to be taking issue with some references to himself that appeared on the website CrookedLawyers.com and demanded to have them removed. He went on to talk about what he described as a Dutchman who he told me had a very nice wife. Mr Hughes went on to explain about a court case with what he described as 6/15ths of costs paid and 9/15ths due to his Office. This was in connection with the construction of a house. I asked Mr Hughes where this awful individual with the very nice wife lived and he told me that he lived in a village outside the town of Westport but did not give me the name of the village. [Read the article in the Sunday Business Post about Mr Hughes and the Dutchman, which contradicts what Mr Hughes said, -Ed.]

It would appear that Mr Hughes is going to hold me, John Gill, responsible for what he disagrees with on the CrookedLawyers.com website. However, I did not know anything about the problems of Mr Hughes and the gentleman from the village unknown, or indeed his very nice wife.

To get away from Mr Hughes’s problems for a moment, I felt it necessary to remind him that I also came from Mayo down near Ballycastle and that nine out of ten of my family emigrated from Mayo and brought back to this country hundreds of thousands of dollars from Australia, New Guinea, Canada and the United States, only to be robbed by the crooks and Mafia-like gangsters of the Irish legal profession. Citing just one firm of crooks, John Casey & Co of Bindon St., Ennis, Co. Clare, I also told Mr Hughes that we were in the process of organising protests throughout the country to name and shame the rogues/criminal element of solicitors and barristers.

Whether it was to impress, intimidate or threaten, I will never know, but Mr Seamus Hughes went on to impress upon me that he was a solicitor of thirty years standing, and the State solicitor for Mayo, and also was an elected TD for Mayo and Fianna Fail, and a friend of Tony Killeen [T.D. for Co. Clare, -Ed.] My answer to that mouthful was that I was a member also and that Fianna Fail was as corrupt as hell.

Mr Seamus Hughes did give me some relief when he told me that he had read my story on the CrookedLawyers.com website, and did admit that it was appalling. Mr Hughes was under the impression that the Law Society was adequately dealing with rogue solicitors. I told Mr Hughes of our members’ impression of Ken Murphy and the Law Society. I also reminded Mr Hughes of the veil of secrecy that was maintained in Ireland over the years by intimidation and threat to cover up the criminal conduct of the so called High Society, namely and mainly the Legal Profession and their fellow travellers, the Fianna Fail Party for the greater part. This, I told Mr Hughes, I was reminded of so many times in the city of Chicago. It is now four full days since I received the threat from Mr Hughes, and still no sign of his allegation in writing.

It is a fact that the corrupt conduct of solicitors and barristers has destroyed many Irish family homes and lives, with no small input from especially, but not entirely, Fianna Fail. Corruption in Ireland is a way of life for the solicitors and barristers of the 26 counties, maintained by a well-placed number of failed solicitors, elected around the country to the mainly Fianna Fail party. They are situated in the North East, sunny South East, misty South West, Mid West, West, and North West; some of whom we will deal with later.

Corruption is a deadly blight and blemish on any society, and the fact that it is tolerated and allowed to fester by an elected Democratic Government is just not acceptable.

It is now firmly established that the Irish legal profession, its solicitors and barristers, and the Political Party nominees to the judicial system for the greater part are corrupt. These are the findings of most of the Victims, who have been dragged through the Courts, battling against serious corruption, fraud, perjury, mass distortion of legal documents, forgery and distortion of Wills to deny the most vulnerable of people their inheritance and their human rights. It will now not surprise anyone if Seamus Hughes will one day be sitting on the bench in judgement of others.

We have copies of the Irish Independent and the Irish Times of the 11th of January 2006. The only solace that many of us can draw from the news about Judicial Reform is that the Office of the Taxing Masters is being abolished. We hope that this will come about sooner rather than later because we believe that this Office, and some people in particular within this Office are sickeningly corrupt (will expose later).

We, the victims of the greedy, grabbing element of the legal and judicial system in Ireland DEMAND that our Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform send out a clear message to this rogue and corrupt element to cease and desist their unlawful, perjurous and contemptuous efforts currently in the Courts all over the country to unlawfully steal from us our inheritance, farms, building sites, holiday homes and money from Clients’ accounts. They will, Minister, be named and shamed without fear, favour, affection or ill will, so help me God!

As assistant Chairman and P.R.O. of the Victims of the Legal Profession Society, I personally would like to thank the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform Micheal McDowell, T.D. for referring my file to the Garda Commissioner.

https://web.archive.org/web/20080627180944/http://crookedlawyers.com/#item10

https://web.archive.org/web/20080908023633/http://www.rate-your-solicitor.com/forum/index.php

Posted in CrookedLawyer Tagged with: , , ,

Mary Boyle The Untold Story

Mary Boyle The Untold Story

A documentary, written and directed by Gemma O’Doherty, about the case of Ireland’s youngest missing person. Mary Boyle vanished on her grandparents’ remote farm in Donegal in March 1977.
She was six years of age. Her remains have never been found. The documentary reveals allegations by retired senior officers that a politician requested the chief suspect not be arrested. He never has been and still lives in Donegal today.
Mary Boyle’s twin Ann claims that her sister was going to reveal a secret. She says she was murdered to stop her from telling it.

anndoyle

Ann Doherty stands courageously outside the Fianna Fail headquarters in Dublin’s Mount Street to demand justice for her murdered twin sister Mary Boyle. She believes the man who raped and killed Mary, and the politician who has shielded him for almost 40 years, are active members of the party. The public must be given all the facts now as frightening and obscene as they are. They deserve nothing less.
Garda statements taken at the time reveal countless inconsistencies, which point in only one direction. It is time to take Mary’s killer off the streets along with all who have shielded him.

Joe Duffy says there is no bias in RTE on the Mary Boyle case

joeduffy

Joe Duffy says there is no bias in RTE on the Mary Boyle case. If that is so, why did the state broadcaster not inform the Irish public about Ann Doherty’s trips to Brussels, Stormont, the House of Commons, and Washington in recent months?
Why did they not report her meetings with the First Minister of NI Arlene Foster and PSNI Chief Constable George Hamilton?
Why did RTE DC correspondent Caitriona Perry not make herself available to interview Ann Doherty during her week-long trip to Capitol Hill in March during which she met numerous American elected representatives all interested in the Mary Boyle case, including former congressman Bruce Morrison.
Why did they not cover her meeting with the Donegal coroner Denis McCauley last December? Why did not properly cover her countless meetings with TDs in Dail Eireann?
Why did they understate the hundreds of people who turned out at marches for Mary Boyle in recent weeks? Why did they not report a protest at Fianna Fail HQ in Mount St last weekend? Why do they claim people who had nothing to do with Mary’s murder may have had something to do with it without having a shred of evidence to back their claims up? Why won’t RTE re-release a fascinating ‘Today Tonight’ programme from 1985 which exposes the incestuous relationships between FF and some former senior Ballyshannon gardai?
Why have they interviewed the mother of Mary Boyle, Ann Boyle, about the case over the decades and ignored the testimony of Mary’s identical twin Ann, who believes her mother should be arrested for withholding information about the murder?
Why do they not have Mrs Boyle on the public airwaves any longer?
Why do they churn out garda spin and deception about the case time and time again?
And yet why did they give wall-to-wall coverage to the case of Mairia Cahill, whose alleged rape happened in another jurisdiction?
Mary Boyle was murdered in this country. Her death is being covered up by this government and its garda force.
I think the public who pay €160 every year so that RTE can exist deserve answers.
Don’t you? If so, the Liveline, as they say, is open now, but good luck with that!

Mary Boyle documentary wins awards in Hollywood

Investigative journalist Gemma O Doherty released ‘Mary Boyle: The Untold Story’ exactly a month ago on the video sharing platform Youtube.com, and has received praise both nationally and internationally for her work.

‘Mary Boyle: The Untold Story’ won an Award of Excellence in the Feature Documentary category and an Award of Recognition in the Women Filmmaker section at the Hollywood Indepdendent Documentary Awards July 2016.

Despite set backs such as being forced to remove the documentary for a period of time due to a threatened defamation case, and having R.T.E. bill Gemma a staggering €12,915 to use a three and a half minute clip from their archives in the documentary, the documentary has done extremely well, racking up over 148,000 views.

The documentary took several years of investigation and research, and three months to produce.

Mary’s twin sister Ann has been on a pursuit for the truth for the last forty years, which has taken her to Stormont, Westminster, Brussels and Washington DC. She has been accompanied by Gemma O Doherty in her campaign.

Mary Boyle went missing in March 1977 at just six years old from her grandparent’s farm in Ballyshannon.

Little Mary is Ireland’s youngest missing person.

Mary Boyle documentary wins awards in Hollywood

 

 

Posted in Victims

Peter D Penalty Points Jones State Solicitor Mullingar Westmeath Reported to Law Society of Ireland

Law-Society-of-Ireland-peter-d-jones-complaint

Complaint to Law Society of Ireland re Peter D Penalty Points Jones

On 01/04/2016 peter d penalty points jones State Solicitor sent me Michael Gavin an Elderly 84 Year Old retired farmer and former CIE employee a threatening letter on behalf of his client robert b. marren Mullingar.

I am outraged at the reluctance of peter d. jones to respond to my letter send back to him on 12th of April 2016 in which I requested 7 pieces of evidence and answers to 20 questions concerning his client robert b. marren.

Copy of both letters enclosed

I demand that this matter be investigated and a response to my correspondence.

 

 Sent to:

Complaints and Client Relations Section, Law Society of Ireland,

George’s Court, George’s Lane,

Dublin 7.     

Dear Mr. peter d penalty points jones State Solicitor,

Further to your letter of April 1st 2016, I hereby inform you that we are preparing a file for the Garda Fraud Squad in relation to the administration of the estate of my late brother Patrick Gavin by your client Robert B. Marren solicitor Castle Street, Mullingar.

I demand that you provide documentary evidence of the following:

  1. Invoice for Willie Penrose’s fee that the estate was charged for.
  2. Proof that Willie Penrose was in fact paid for his opinion.
  3. Correct invoice for Catherine O’Connor.
  4. Proof that your client Robert B. Marren received €165,000 from Anne Sanford and Kathleen O’Keefe through their solicitor Tony Mc Lynn of T & N McLynn Solicitors Athlone to cover Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney’s 1/6 share from the land sale.
  5. Invoice for John Dolan Auctioneer Ballinasloe, Co. Galway
  6. Detailed bill of costs for your client Robert B. Marren
  7. Detailed Bill of costs for T&N McLynn solicitors Athlone.

Provide answers to the following:

  1. Why Did Robert B. Marren refuse to award Michael Gavin the grant money paid down from the dept. of Agriculture? Mike Gavin is owed over €116,000 for 9 Years unpaid.
  2. Why did Robert B. Marren hold on to the funds from the land sale for nearly 2 years?
  3. Why did Robert B. Marren award Elderly Michael Gavin and his widowed sister €12,500 plus interest less than what they were entitled to?
  4. Why did Robert B. Marren deduct €3,500 from Eileen Linney for Animals she never owned?
  5. Why was no invoice provided for William Penrose’s TD BL opinion?
  6. Why did Robert B. Marren hire an additional accountant Damien Hannigan 7 Oliver Plunkett St. Mullingar at a cost of €8,751.45 to oversee the Accounts?
  7. Why did Robert B. Marren not provide the correct invoice for Accountant Catherine O’Connor?
  8. Why did Mr. Robert B. Marren not provide a “Detailed Bill of Costs” for his fee of €40,892.53 he awarded to himself?
  9. Why did Robert B. Marren Solicitor consider the other beneficiaries to be his clients?
  10. Why did Robert B. Marren distribute the estate assets in isolation to well-founed objections?
  11. Why did Robert B. Marren refuse to take the well-founded objection to a Judge?
  12. Why did Robert B. Marren threaten 2 of the elderly beneficiaries and coerce them to retain a solicitor to prevent him distributing the estate assets?
  13. Why did Robert B. Marren distribute the estate assets speedily over the Christmas period 2014 in the knowledge that 2 of the beneficiaries were actively attempting to retain a solicitor to act on their behalf?
  14. Why did Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone fail to undertake the instructions given him through John Glynn Solicitors to prevent Mr. Robert Marren closing in isolation to well-founded objections?
  15. Why did T & N McLynn Solicitors, Athlone summon (special )Mike Gavin and Eileen Linney to the High Court attempting to sell his home along with the farm and failed after three days squandering estate assets with fees in the High Court?
  16. Why was no bill of costs provided for T & N McLynn Solicitors, Athlone, paid an amount of €38,941 a year prior to the distribution of the estate assets?
  17. Why did/does Robert Marren refuse to provide answers to these and other questions?
  18. Why Has Robert B. Marren retained you Peter D Penalty Points Jones Mullingar State Solicitor to represent him?
  19. Why do you Peter D. Jones THREATEN Elderly Michael Gavin Not to PEACEFUL Protest outside Robert Marren Solicitors Office?
  20. Why should we tolerate Financial Elder Abuse?

I hope you now appreciate why we continue to protest peacefully outside you client Mr. Robert B. Marren’s office.

Posted in News, Solicitors Tagged with: , , , , , ,

Free Anna Harvey was given two months in prison at Swords District Court

FreeAnnaHarvey1

Free Anna Harvey

Anna Harvey was given two months in prison at Swords District Court this morning Wednesday 20-07-2016.

Anna was up today for sentencing and only 2 friends showed up to support Anna.

Anna was not given proper notice of her hearing last year but the case still went ahead in her absence. The barrister said the case went ahead due to Anna not recognising the courts authority over her..

The judge decided he would hear the case without her, because she requested she be given notice to allow her to form a defence. Anyway she was sent to Mountjoy prison.

Anna Harvey has campaigned for so many things that all Irish families benefit from now, even judges families. This woman is a gift to the Irish people, she deserves our support at this time.

So contact your public representatives  and don’t let them know you are upset at how the Irish women are being treated in our courts.

This disgusting news. 

Note:
Ref. Holding a hearing in ones absence.

E. C. Law (general principles of law)
“The right to be heard in proceeding is essential”

See Precedent –
Hoffman La Roche Vs Commission 1979 ECJ

Note:
Anna’s proceedings were in clear breach of article 6 & 13 of European convention of human rights and also 40.3 of the Irish Constitution 1937.

Peaceful Assembly (vigil) has been arranged (by family) to be held outside the prison for Every Sunday at 3pm after the Dublin Says No march. The DSN March will leave central back at 13:30 and proceed to Mountjoy prison;

Support from all groups would be appreciated.

Message from behind the wall of Corruption.

Yesterday Anna gave us this post to release to the public if incarcerated without a hearing. Please share.
…………………………………………………………………………….
anna harvey <annaharvey2011@gmail.com>
Attachments10:46 PM (0 minutes ago)

to supremecourt
To the Hon Mr Justice Donal O’ Donnell I am appealing to you regarding my case which I have attached , I am going for sentencing in swords court tomorrow and I did not even have a hearing,

I told the Judge that he can not do that under article 6 of the human rights I am entitled to a fair trial and a fair hearing which I am entitled to and I did not get ,

He said “they had a hearing but I did not bother to show up”? which is a lie maybe because I was not told of the court date! as you can see from the file attached I went down to the garda station in Coolock. ,

I have tried to find out what I was charged with and the Garda refused to tell me as you will see from the photos , what Justice Dermot Dempsey is doing is illegal they said I was there as a public nuisance which you will see is not true we had a damn good reason to want to speak to Enda Kenny

as you will see also if a person is being attacked you have the right to try defend him even if it is the Garda that is breaking the law in breach of the peace and the unlawful attack on his person he was not able to defend himself as two big burly garda had his arms pinned behind his back while another gave Richie Larkin a knee full force into the Groin and the three of them thought it was very funny and they held him up while they were laughing and stopped him from collapsing to the ground ,

the footage you will be able to see as they have it in the pharmasceutical company in question.

I had to save him from being savagely attacked by 3 Garda at a peaceful Campaign and we had Aims and Objectives to put to Enda Kenny which had to be addressed, the only crime Richie Larkin committed was his concerns for his young daughter as it is all explained in the file as were we all ,

they had no reason to attack us and throw us around like rag dolls and get beat upon by thug Garda this has to stop and real justice has to prevail

Yours Sincerely

Anna of the family Harvey and of the Clan O’ Donnell,
from: anna harvey <annaharvey2011@gmail.com>
to: supremecourt@courts.ie
date: Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:16 PM
subject: The Hon. Mr. Justice Donal O’Donnell

LEARN HOW THE JUDGES PULL THE WOOL OVER YOUR EYES

If you can find one to do as you say, then you will prevail, but most of them would rather hang onto their BAR cards than behave honourably.

The only thing that dead, fictional entities want from us is our life energy, and the only way they can get it is by our agreement. Without us, they cannot function, so, they are desperate to get us into court, to have us pay the debt which they created by charging the trust.

Since common law courts no longer exist, we know that the case never has anything to do with “facts” or live men and women and so, anyone who testifies (talks about the facts of the case) is doomed.

ALL courts operate in trust law, based upon ecclesiastical canon law–– ritualism, superstition, satanism, etc.––which manifests as insidious, commercial law and we are in court to take the hit, if they can get us to do so.

They use every trick in the book––intimidation, fear, threat, ridicule, rage, and even recesses, in order to change the jurisdiction, when they know they are losing, in order to make us admit that we are the name of the trust. When we do so, we are deemed to be the trustee––the one liable for administering the trust.

Ergo, until now, it has been a waste of our time, energy, and emotion to go to a place where it is almost certain that we will be stuck with the liability.

We all know from our indoctrination, programming, and schooling that judges are impartial and have sworn an oath to this effect. This means he must not favour either plaintiff or defendant.

But, our experience reveals that he does, indeed, favour the plaintiff, indicating a glaring conflict of interest––that the prosecutor, judge, and clerk all work for the state––the owner of the CQV trust. So, as the case is NOT about “justice”, it must be about the administration of a trust.

They all…. “Represent”…. the trust ….owned….. by the “state” and, if WE are beneficiary, the only two positions left are Trustee= Judge and Executor= Prosecutor. So, if you detect the judge’s partiality, although I doubt the case will get this far, you might just want to let them know that you know this.

Article 32 – Supreme Juridic Person
Canon 1619 link
A Supreme Juridic Person is recorded and enrolled in the Great Roll of Divine Persons associated with a Supreme Divine Trust registered with the Great Register and Public Record of One Heaven as an aggregate of one hundred (100) Divine Persons formed as the body of a Supreme Trust when such Divine Persons share similar characteristics

BAR stands for British Accreditation Registry

The British Legal System Of Mixed Common And Roman Law Has Been Used To Enslave Ireland the U.S.A and all the Countries they have colonised

Any Judge, government agent, or bureaucrat who has sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States – who is violating that oath – is Guilty of Treason.

The Penalty is still DEATH BY HANGING.

After the Revolutionary War of 1776 was over – since no actual surrender papers had been signed – King George III decided that the colonies still belonged to him, to England, and all that Remained was for him to figure out how to get them back again under his direct control. To do this he determined to use the bank’s, both of the United States Ireland and of England, as one method.

But to underpin his efforts, he needed lawyers or attorneys here in the ‘colonies’ to make it all happen. The ‘legal’ ramifications of how things had to be brought about had become an important issue to England ever since the days of the Magna Carta.

Lawyers, known more prominently as “BARristers”, had arisen to great power in England since the days of the old knights. But the battle by these heirs of knighthood this time was forged against good and not evil, for this new thing that the People in America were calling “freedom” was a dangerous consideration for a King.

He knew they had to be controlled form within without them knowing it King George needed the lawyers or attorneys over in the Colonies to be members, or Esquires, of England’s International BAR Association, the only BAR association in the world, headquartered right in good old London town and under his own direct control, but with operations established in the United States, with certain strong ties into the Congress.

The International BAR Association was alive and well in America.

That thing called “Freedom” would soon come to its own end. So said King George. 

The BAR was England’s own British Accreditation Registry, its members were considered to be nobles – being above the common person, and all lawyers or attorneys had to belong to it, and they were under the will of the King, and the Bank of England. And if there was any opposition to his plan, he might just cause another WAR to maintain his position for control of the United States. He just might…


We now fast forward to consider an interesting legal issue.

According to this and many other sources, there was a thirteenth amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America
— not the one that we think we have now – that was removed during the time just before or during the Civil War.

In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine.

By chance, they discovered the library’s oldest authentic copy of the Constitution (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a thirteenth amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution.

After studying the *original* thirteenth amendment’s language and historical context, they realized that the principle intent of the missing 13th amendment was to prohibit lawyers, particularly members of the BAR association, from serving in government!

This missing 13th Amendment suppressed and even stopped the forming or continued existence of any BAR association for over four decades, from 1822 to 1867, and evidence of its existence has been found in over 10 different states and territories throughout the United States.

Then they removed it without the public ever knowing about it and elected themselves into the government.

How did a lawfully ratified Amendment to the Constitution simply disappear, vanish, without so much as a nod of disturbance, or at least some curiosity from the
people?

And an amendment that deliberately targeted attorneys who were members of the BAR association, to prevent BAR members from holding any public office – thereby preventing attorneys from passing legislation that would most assuredly serve the greedy and nefarious interests of not only the BAR association itself, but also the King of England, right along with the other royal heads of Europe?

So that WE might not be conquered from within, as opposed to without?

The courts only recognize TWO classes of people in the United States today:

Your BAR Attorney’s Secret Oath

What was the effect and the significance of the Erie RR. v. Thompkins case decision of 1938?

The significance is that since the Erie decision, no cases are allowed to be cited that are prior to 1939. There can be no mixing of the old law with the new law.

The lawyers (who were members of the American BAR Association, were and are currently under and controlled by the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain) created, formed and implemented the new bankruptcy law. The American BAR Association is a franchise of the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain.

Since the Erie RR. v. Thompkins case was decided; the practice of law in this country was never again to be the same.

It has been reported (source unknown to the writer) that every lawyer in existence and every lawyer coming up has to take a SECRET OATH to support the bankruptcy.

This seems to make sense after reading about Mr. Sweet’ s CASE FILE DISAPPEARANCE, discussed below.

There is more to it. Not only do they promise to support the bankruptcy, but the lawyers and judges also promise never to reveal who the true creditor party is in the bankruptcy proceedings!

In court, there is never identification and appearance of the true character and principal of the proceedings. This is where you can get them for not making an appearance in court. If there is no appearance of the true party to the action, then there is no way the defendant is able to know the true NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE ACTION.

You are never told the true NATURE AND THE CAUSE OF WHY YOU ARE IN FRONT OF THEIR COURT. The court is forbidden to tell you that information. That’s why, if you question the true nature and cause, the judge will say, “It’s not my job to tell you. You are not retaining me as an attorney and I can’t give you legal advice from the bench.

I suggest you hire a lawyer.” That is because he has not got a licence. 

Practicing Law Without A License Lawyer – Learned in the law to advise in a court

BARrister – One who is privileged to plead at the bar

Advocate – One who pleads within the BAR for a defendant

Attorn-ey – One who transfers or assigns, within the bar, another’s money, goods/ property, rights and title to and acting on behalf of the ruling crown (government).

If anyone ever charges you with illegal/unlawful “Practicing law without a license”, just say: “No attorney or lawyer in the U.S. has ever been “LICENSED” to practice law” (they’ve exempted themselves, and no such crime exists) as they are a abstract, artificial, bogus, bullshit, counterfeit, dead, fraudulent, imaginary, non-existent, statutory “FICTION OF LAW” “person” and only an “ADMITTED MEMBER” to practice law in the private franchise member “club” called the “BAR” (British or
BARrister Aristocratic Regency, or British Accreditation Registry — B.A.R. as in put in Jail Behind BARs, to BAR = stop = arrest = kidnap = abduct, or also attorneys are absolutely “BAR”red from challenging the jurisdiction of the court), and as such they are unlawful “un-registered foreign agents”.

Attorneys and lawyers only have “BAR Cards” which are clearly not “licenses.

The lawyers, who are members of one or more State BAR Associations (private membership clubs), which are franchised by the Irish and American BAR Association are all under and controlled by the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain which created, formed, and implemented the financial BANKRUPTCY Law filed 3/9/33, which bankruptcy is still in full force and effect today, for and on behalf of the International Banksters as “Creditors” thereof.

Therefore, said attorneys/lawyers are Traitors, Esquires (noblemen training for knighthood, Un-Constitutional title of honor and nobility = Esquires), alien and foreign “non-citizens” and are specifically prohibited by the USA Constitution from ever voting in any election (Election Fraud) or from ever holding any elected public office of trust whatsoever! Even “jailhouse lawyer” prisoner inmates are Constitutionally protected and assured access to the courts.

Attorneys are not really lawyers, as attorneys practice “attornment” (turn over goods, services, etc. to another; i.e. robbers and thieves) and lawyers practice “law”. Lawyers are supposedly learned in the law and advise in a court while an attorn-eys transfer or assign someone’s rights or property, etc to another and acts on behalf of the ruling crown (government).

In 1878 the American legal system came under the control of a Labor Union known as the worldwide (BRITISH) BAR ASSOCIATION. Consequently, “their” courts have become “Closed Union Shops.

The judges have become the union bosses of those “private” for profit courts. These judges are overseen by a principal union boss or union superintendent, a Supreme Court Justice of the State.

The criminal attorneys, barristers and counselors at law, and lawyers, together with the international banksters, control everything of importance in government (they unlawfully control, own and have usurped (by force of law) all 3 branches of government), the BAR Association controls the Attorneys, et al, and the aristocratic elite monied power control the worldwide franchised “private” British BAR Associations (the American BAR Association is but one private franchise amoung hundreds
Worldwide including Ireland ).

The BAR Association Labor Union only allows union lawyers called attorneys to use the pubicly tax-financed “private” courts (Union Hall or Local Union) with Local Rules called “Rules of the Court”.

The ultimate goal of the BAR Associations is the overthrow the GOVERNMENT of Ireland , and America and its Constitution, the complete and total enslavement and
subjugation of its people, and to re-establish an absolute incontestable form of ancient Babylonian and Masonic Medieval British Feudalism in Ireland, America and the rest of the world which will become the New World Order, One World Government, under Mob Rule “Democracy” (the merging of capitalism and communism, and a “military Dictatorship run by the “Commander-in-Chief” called the “President or the lord lieutenant to the QUEEN OF ENGLAND AS HE IS KNOWN “AND THAT BLAUGARD IS CALLED HIGGINS AND HE IS LORDING IT UP IN THE PHOENISX PARK ) HE SHOULD BE SENT PACKING BACK TO HIS MAD QUEEN

Attorneys first came into existence because GOVERNMENT created and invented abstract, artificial, bogus, counterfeit, dead, fraudulent, non-existent statutory “FICTIONS OF LAW” “persons”, “citizens”, “individuals”, “people”, the “public”, “residents” (the thing, identified), “taxpayers”, “registered voters”, etc. could not (re)present themselves in court since they did not really exist and so could not speak for themselves and thus need a “spokesperson”.

Therefore, they had to have a mouthpiece [someone to speak for and on their behalf and to “DEfend” (NOT fend, NOT ward off, not fight for NOR offer defense)
them] to speak for and “RE-present” (RE-create, RE-fashion, REform, RE-make, RE-mold, RE-place, RE-produce, change, convert, exchange, substitute and TRANCEform) these nonexistent brainless, deaf and dumb fictions.

Back then as now, living and breathing souls, real and natural, flesh and blood “men or women” as defendants in court could not be represented by a third party since they could and were required to speak for themselves. A “human being” does not have a right to
re-presentation, he has a right to “assistance of counsel”. These are two very different concepts.

Pro Se status is nothing more than the de-fendant moving the court to allow him to waive the right to “assistance of counsel”.

The word “attorney” (attorn-ee, attorn-ey) definition derives from “to attorn” meaning “to turn over, to transfer to another money, goods/property, rights or title”. In other words, lawyers are simply high paid criminals, embezzlers, leeches (blood suckers), magots, parasites, prostitutes (who persecute and prosecute), robbers and thieves, etc., hired to rob and steal from Peter (the plaintiff and the defendent) to pay Paul, Paul being the British Aristocratic Monarchy which franchises the worldwide BAR associations, the creditors of the bankruptcy of 3/9/33 and the international banksters.

Protester kneed garda in the groin

Nicola Donnelly

PUBLISHED27/02/2016

http://www.independent.ie/regionals/fingalindependent/news/protester-kneed-garda-in-the-groin-34474693.html

A water protester who kneed a garda in the groin while protesting outside a Swords business while An Taoiseach Enda Kenny and other dignitaries were attending a function has been found guilty of the assault in her absence at Swords District Court.

Anna Harvey (53) did not attend the court for the hearing as according to defence solicitor Fiona D’Arcy, she ‘does not recognise this court.’

Judge Dermot Dempsey said he would proceed with the case on a not guilty plea. Harvey, of Macroom Avenue in Coolock is alleged to have assaulted Garda Keith Murphy of Swords Garda Station at Watery Lane in Swords on February 26th last year.

Sergeant Kevin Toner gave evidence that at 5.30pm a group of 20 to 25 water protesters gathered outside Bristol Myers Squibb where An Taoiseach and other dignitaries were attending a function.

‘The protesters attempted to obstruct the dignitaries and Harvey kneed Garda Murphy in the groin.’

Garda Keith Murphy said while he was on duty he identified Harvey, who was wearing a high viz bib, as one of the protesters.

‘She was very vocal and spoke using a mega phone. As An Taoiseach was driven through the gate of the factory Harvey tried to get to the front window of the car,’ said Gda Murphy. ‘She was extremely aggressive towards gardai.’

He said when An Taoiseach’s State car was existing the factory Harvey attempted to block the path of the vehicle.

‘She became angry and abusive towards gardai and without warning she kneed me in the groin,’ said Gda Murphy. ‘I was bent over in pain and found it difficult to arrest her.’

He said he was removed from the situation by other gardai and the protest continued when other State vehicles passed through the factor gates. He said he recognised Harvey as he had ‘come across her at a number of anti-water metre protests.’

Judge Dermot Dempsey found Harvey guilty of the offence in her absence and issued a bench warrant for her arrest for the purpose of sentencing her.

Fingal Independent

http://www.independent.ie/regionals/fingalindependent/news/protester-kneed-garda-in-the-groin-34474693.html

Posted in News Tagged with: ,

Anna Harvey was given two months in prison at Swords District Court this morning

FreeAnnaHarvey

Anna Harvey was given two months in prison at Swords District Court this morning Wednesday 20-07-2016.

Anna was up today for sentencing and only 2 friends showed up to support Anna.

Anna was not given proper notice of her hearing last year but the case still went ahead in her absence. The barrister said the case went ahead due to Anna not recognising the courts authority over her..

The judge decided he would hear the case without her, because she requested she be given notice to allow her to form a defence. Anyway she was sent to Mountjoy prison.

Anna Harvey has campaigned for so many things that all Irish families benefit from now, even judges families. This woman is a gift to the Irish people, she deserves our support at this time.

So contact your public representatives  and don’t let them know you are upset at how the Irish women are being treated in our courts.

This disgusting news. 

Note:
Ref. Holding a hearing in ones absence.

E. C. Law (general principles of law)
“The right to be heard in proceeding is essential”

See Precedent –
Hoffman La Roche Vs Commission 1979 ECJ

Note:
Anna’s proceedings were in clear breach of article 6 & 13 of European convention of human rights and also 40.3 of the Irish Constitution 1937.

Peaceful Assembly (vigil) has been arranged (by family) to be held outside the prison for Every Sunday at 3pm after the Dublin Says No march. The DSN March will leave central back at 13:30 and proceed to Mountjoy prison;

Support from all groups would be appreciated.

FreeannaHarveyMarch

We will be Meeting this Sunday the 24th at 12:30pm outside The Central Bank. The march will starts at 1:30pm then on to the Drochas Center Mountjoy. We will be marching Every Sunday in conjunction with Dublin Says No Until Till Anna’s Release. All society groups are welcome.
If you wish to visit anna or are planing other events please contact anna’s son Jonathan Whelan by P.M.’s on this page or his own profile page, thank you.

 

Message from behind the wall of Corruption.

Yesterday Anna gave us this post to release to the public if incarcerated without a hearing. Please share.
…………………………………………………………………………….
anna harvey <annaharvey2011@gmail.com>
Attachments10:46 PM (0 minutes ago)

to supremecourt
To the Hon Mr Justice Donal O’ Donnell I am appealing to you regarding my case which I have attached , I am going for sentencing in swords court tomorrow and I did not even have a hearing,

I told the Judge that he can not do that under article 6 of the human rights I am entitled to a fair trial and a fair hearing which I am entitled to and I did not get ,

He said “they had a hearing but I did not bother to show up”? which is a lie maybe because I was not told of the court date! as you can see from the file attached I went down to the garda station in Coolock. ,

I have tried to find out what I was charged with and the Garda refused to tell me as you will see from the photos , what Justice Dermot Dempsey is doing is illegal they said I was there as a public nuisance which you will see is not true we had a damn good reason to want to speak to Enda Kenny

as you will see also if a person is being attacked you have the right to try defend him even if it is the Garda that is breaking the law in breach of the peace and the unlawful attack on his person he was not able to defend himself as two big burly garda had his arms pinned behind his back while another gave Richie Larkin a knee full force into the Groin and the three of them thought it was very funny and they held him up while they were laughing and stopped him from collapsing to the ground ,

the footage you will be able to see as they have it in the pharmasceutical company in question.

I had to save him from being savagely attacked by 3 Garda at a peaceful Campaign and we had Aims and Objectives to put to Enda Kenny which had to be addressed, the only crime Richie Larkin committed was his concerns for his young daughter as it is all explained in the file as were we all ,

they had no reason to attack us and throw us around like rag dolls and get beat upon by thug Garda this has to stop and real justice has to prevail

Yours Sincerely

Anna of the family Harvey and of the Clan O’ Donnell,
from: anna harvey <annaharvey2011@gmail.com>
to: supremecourt@courts.ie
date: Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:16 PM
subject: The Hon. Mr. Justice Donal O’Donnell

 

Facts upon the matter –

Garda R 184Anna Harvey Vs Garda R 184

“Some Nuts Deserve To Be Cracked”
Video evidence that has Recently come to light which Proves that Garda Keith Murphy misled the court of justice.

What Garda Keith Murphy also failed to say on the stand was that the Gardaí had planned to physically attack the Anti-Geo-engineering Campaigners, simultaneously as a distraction when Enda Kenny was to exit the building.

This was a serious attempt to insight a breach of the peace or an attempt to insight a riot by use of unlawful violence for a common purpose.
A person guilty of an offence of riot shall be liable on conviction on indictment to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or both.

Video evidence proves that Garda Keith Murphy had failed to say that he kneed a male campaigner in the groin while the male campaigner was been restrained on both sides by 2 other Gardaí.(i.e. Held upright to hide the campaigners groin injury)

Garda Keith Murphy failed to say that he touched Anna inappropriately and then violently through Anna to the ground backwards (up through the air) as seen in recent Video evidence. Garda Keith Murphy’s unprovoked action could have caused serious spinal injury or concussion which could have lead to brain trauma.

From viewing the Video evidence it is clear to see “Keith Murphy” was in breach of the Garda code of conduct by choosing to operate outside its remit.

Has An Garda Síochána are in breach of Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005 & under (General Application) Regulations 2007 Section 8 of the Act the employer has a duty to ensure the employees’ safety, health and welfare at work.

Has Garda Keith Murphy has breached the duties of employees while at work are set out in Section 13 of the Act. Include the following:
To take reasonable care to protect the health and safety of themselves and of other people in the workplace.

Did An Garda Síochána provide appropriate safety equipment ?

Did Garda Keith Murphy take reasonable care by wearing a groin guard on the alleged date ?

One would wonder, Could it be that he needed something to “Fill It” to keep it in Place ?

Some Gardaí out there need to learn that;

“Copping A Feel while on duty is Still a Criminal Offence.”

 

LEARN HOW THE JUDGES PULL THE WOOL OVER YOUR EYES

If you can find one to do as you say, then you will prevail, but most of them would rather hang onto their BAR cards than behave honourably.

The only thing that dead, fictional entities want from us is our life energy, and the only way they can get it is by our agreement. Without us, they cannot function, so, they are desperate to get us into court, to have us pay the debt which they created by charging the trust.

Since common law courts no longer exist, we know that the case never has anything to do with “facts” or live men and women and so, anyone who testifies (talks about the facts of the case) is doomed.

ALL courts operate in trust law, based upon ecclesiastical canon law–– ritualism, superstition, satanism, etc.––which manifests as insidious, commercial law and we are in court to take the hit, if they can get us to do so.

They use every trick in the book––intimidation, fear, threat, ridicule, rage, and even recesses, in order to change the jurisdiction, when they know they are losing, in order to make us admit that we are the name of the trust. When we do so, we are deemed to be the trustee––the one liable for administering the trust.

Ergo, until now, it has been a waste of our time, energy, and emotion to go to a place where it is almost certain that we will be stuck with the liability.

We all know from our indoctrination, programming, and schooling that judges are impartial and have sworn an oath to this effect. This means he must not favour either plaintiff or defendant.

But, our experience reveals that he does, indeed, favour the plaintiff, indicating a glaring conflict of interest––that the prosecutor, judge, and clerk all work for the state––the owner of the CQV trust. So, as the case is NOT about “justice”, it must be about the administration of a trust.

They all…. “Represent”…. the trust ….owned….. by the “state” and, if WE are beneficiary, the only two positions left are Trustee= Judge and Executor= Prosecutor. So, if you detect the judge’s partiality, although I doubt the case will get this far, you might just want to let them know that you know this.

Article 32 – Supreme Juridic Person
Canon 1619 link
A Supreme Juridic Person is recorded and enrolled in the Great Roll of Divine Persons associated with a Supreme Divine Trust registered with the Great Register and Public Record of One Heaven as an aggregate of one hundred (100) Divine Persons formed as the body of a Supreme Trust when such Divine Persons share similar characteristics

BAR stands for British Accreditation Registry

The British Legal System Of Mixed Common And Roman Law Has Been Used To Enslave Ireland the U.S.A and all the Countries they have colonised

Any Judge, government agent, or bureaucrat who has sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States – who is violating that oath – is Guilty of Treason.

The Penalty is still DEATH BY HANGING.

After the Revolutionary War of 1776 was over – since no actual surrender papers had been signed – King George III decided that the colonies still belonged to him, to England, and all that Remained was for him to figure out how to get them back again under his direct control. To do this he determined to use the bank’s, both of the United States Ireland and of England, as one method.

But to underpin his efforts, he needed lawyers or attorneys here in the ‘colonies’ to make it all happen. The ‘legal’ ramifications of how things had to be brought about had become an important issue to England ever since the days of the Magna Carta.

Lawyers, known more prominently as “BARristers”, had arisen to great power in England since the days of the old knights. But the battle by these heirs of knighthood this time was forged against good and not evil, for this new thing that the People in America were calling “freedom” was a dangerous consideration for a King.

He knew they had to be controlled form within without them knowing it King George needed the lawyers or attorneys over in the Colonies to be members, or Esquires, of England’s International BAR Association, the only BAR association in the world, headquartered right in good old London town and under his own direct control, but with operations established in the United States, with certain strong ties into the Congress.

The International BAR Association was alive and well in America.

That thing called “Freedom” would soon come to its own end. So said King George. 

The BAR was England’s own British Accreditation Registry, its members were considered to be nobles – being above the common person, and all lawyers or attorneys had to belong to it, and they were under the will of the King, and the Bank of England. And if there was any opposition to his plan, he might just cause another WAR to maintain his position for control of the United States. He just might…


We now fast forward to consider an interesting legal issue.

According to this and many other sources, there was a thirteenth amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America
— not the one that we think we have now – that was removed during the time just before or during the Civil War.

In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine.

By chance, they discovered the library’s oldest authentic copy of the Constitution (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a thirteenth amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution.

After studying the *original* thirteenth amendment’s language and historical context, they realized that the principle intent of the missing 13th amendment was to prohibit lawyers, particularly members of the BAR association, from serving in government!

This missing 13th Amendment suppressed and even stopped the forming or continued existence of any BAR association for over four decades, from 1822 to 1867, and evidence of its existence has been found in over 10 different states and territories throughout the United States.

Then they removed it without the public ever knowing about it and elected themselves into the government.

How did a lawfully ratified Amendment to the Constitution simply disappear, vanish, without so much as a nod of disturbance, or at least some curiosity from the
people?

And an amendment that deliberately targeted attorneys who were members of the BAR association, to prevent BAR members from holding any public office – thereby preventing attorneys from passing legislation that would most assuredly serve the greedy and nefarious interests of not only the BAR association itself, but also the King of England, right along with the other royal heads of Europe?

So that WE might not be conquered from within, as opposed to without?

The courts only recognize TWO classes of people in the United States today:

Your BAR Attorney’s Secret Oath

What was the effect and the significance of the Erie RR. v. Thompkins case decision of 1938?

The significance is that since the Erie decision, no cases are allowed to be cited that are prior to 1939. There can be no mixing of the old law with the new law.

The lawyers (who were members of the American BAR Association, were and are currently under and controlled by the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain) created, formed and implemented the new bankruptcy law. The American BAR Association is a franchise of the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain.

Since the Erie RR. v. Thompkins case was decided; the practice of law in this country was never again to be the same.

It has been reported (source unknown to the writer) that every lawyer in existence and every lawyer coming up has to take a SECRET OATH to support the bankruptcy.

This seems to make sense after reading about Mr. Sweet’ s CASE FILE DISAPPEARANCE, discussed below.

There is more to it. Not only do they promise to support the bankruptcy, but the lawyers and judges also promise never to reveal who the true creditor party is in the bankruptcy proceedings!

In court, there is never identification and appearance of the true character and principal of the proceedings. This is where you can get them for not making an appearance in court. If there is no appearance of the true party to the action, then there is no way the defendant is able to know the true NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE ACTION.

You are never told the true NATURE AND THE CAUSE OF WHY YOU ARE IN FRONT OF THEIR COURT. The court is forbidden to tell you that information. That’s why, if you question the true nature and cause, the judge will say, “It’s not my job to tell you. You are not retaining me as an attorney and I can’t give you legal advice from the bench.

I suggest you hire a lawyer.” That is because he has not got a licence. 

Practicing Law Without A License Lawyer – Learned in the law to advise in a court

BARrister – One who is privileged to plead at the bar

Advocate – One who pleads within the BAR for a defendant

Attorn-ey – One who transfers or assigns, within the bar, another’s money, goods/ property, rights and title to and acting on behalf of the ruling crown (government).

If anyone ever charges you with illegal/unlawful “Practicing law without a license”, just say: “No attorney or lawyer in the U.S. has ever been “LICENSED” to practice law” (they’ve exempted themselves, and no such crime exists) as they are a abstract, artificial, bogus, bullshit, counterfeit, dead, fraudulent, imaginary, non-existent, statutory “FICTION OF LAW” “person” and only an “ADMITTED MEMBER” to practice law in the private franchise member “club” called the “BAR” (British or
BARrister Aristocratic Regency, or British Accreditation Registry — B.A.R. as in put in Jail Behind BARs, to BAR = stop = arrest = kidnap = abduct, or also attorneys are absolutely “BAR”red from challenging the jurisdiction of the court), and as such they are unlawful “un-registered foreign agents”.

Attorneys and lawyers only have “BAR Cards” which are clearly not “licenses.

The lawyers, who are members of one or more State BAR Associations (private membership clubs), which are franchised by the Irish and American BAR Association are all under and controlled by the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain which created, formed, and implemented the financial BANKRUPTCY Law filed 3/9/33, which bankruptcy is still in full force and effect today, for and on behalf of the International Banksters as “Creditors” thereof.

Therefore, said attorneys/lawyers are Traitors, Esquires (noblemen training for knighthood, Un-Constitutional title of honor and nobility = Esquires), alien and foreign “non-citizens” and are specifically prohibited by the USA Constitution from ever voting in any election (Election Fraud) or from ever holding any elected public office of trust whatsoever! Even “jailhouse lawyer” prisoner inmates are Constitutionally protected and assured access to the courts.

Attorneys are not really lawyers, as attorneys practice “attornment” (turn over goods, services, etc. to another; i.e. robbers and thieves) and lawyers practice “law”. Lawyers are supposedly learned in the law and advise in a court while an attorn-eys transfer or assign someone’s rights or property, etc to another and acts on behalf of the ruling crown (government).

In 1878 the American legal system came under the control of a Labor Union known as the worldwide (BRITISH) BAR ASSOCIATION. Consequently, “their” courts have become “Closed Union Shops.

The judges have become the union bosses of those “private” for profit courts. These judges are overseen by a principal union boss or union superintendent, a Supreme Court Justice of the State.

The criminal attorneys, barristers and counselors at law, and lawyers, together with the international banksters, control everything of importance in government (they unlawfully control, own and have usurped (by force of law) all 3 branches of government), the BAR Association controls the Attorneys, et al, and the aristocratic elite monied power control the worldwide franchised “private” British BAR Associations (the American BAR Association is but one private franchise amoung hundreds
Worldwide including Ireland ).

The BAR Association Labor Union only allows union lawyers called attorneys to use the pubicly tax-financed “private” courts (Union Hall or Local Union) with Local Rules called “Rules of the Court”.

The ultimate goal of the BAR Associations is the overthrow the GOVERNMENT of Ireland , and America and its Constitution, the complete and total enslavement and
subjugation of its people, and to re-establish an absolute incontestable form of ancient Babylonian and Masonic Medieval British Feudalism in Ireland, America and the rest of the world which will become the New World Order, One World Government, under Mob Rule “Democracy” (the merging of capitalism and communism, and a “military Dictatorship run by the “Commander-in-Chief” called the “President or the lord lieutenant to the QUEEN OF ENGLAND AS HE IS KNOWN “AND THAT BLAUGARD IS CALLED HIGGINS AND HE IS LORDING IT UP IN THE PHOENISX PARK ) HE SHOULD BE SENT PACKING BACK TO HIS MAD QUEEN

Attorneys first came into existence because GOVERNMENT created and invented abstract, artificial, bogus, counterfeit, dead, fraudulent, non-existent statutory “FICTIONS OF LAW” “persons”, “citizens”, “individuals”, “people”, the “public”, “residents” (the thing, identified), “taxpayers”, “registered voters”, etc. could not (re)present themselves in court since they did not really exist and so could not speak for themselves and thus need a “spokesperson”.

Therefore, they had to have a mouthpiece [someone to speak for and on their behalf and to “DEfend” (NOT fend, NOT ward off, not fight for NOR offer defense)
them] to speak for and “RE-present” (RE-create, RE-fashion, REform, RE-make, RE-mold, RE-place, RE-produce, change, convert, exchange, substitute and TRANCEform) these nonexistent brainless, deaf and dumb fictions.

Back then as now, living and breathing souls, real and natural, flesh and blood “men or women” as defendants in court could not be represented by a third party since they could and were required to speak for themselves. A “human being” does not have a right to
re-presentation, he has a right to “assistance of counsel”. These are two very different concepts.

Pro Se status is nothing more than the de-fendant moving the court to allow him to waive the right to “assistance of counsel”.

The word “attorney” (attorn-ee, attorn-ey) definition derives from “to attorn” meaning “to turn over, to transfer to another money, goods/property, rights or title”. In other words, lawyers are simply high paid criminals, embezzlers, leeches (blood suckers), magots, parasites, prostitutes (who persecute and prosecute), robbers and thieves, etc., hired to rob and steal from Peter (the plaintiff and the defendent) to pay Paul, Paul being the British Aristocratic Monarchy which franchises the worldwide BAR associations, the creditors of the bankruptcy of 3/9/33 and the international banksters.

Protester kneed garda in the groin

Nicola Donnelly

PUBLISHED27/02/2016

http://www.independent.ie/regionals/fingalindependent/news/protester-kneed-garda-in-the-groin-34474693.html

A water protester who kneed a garda in the groin while protesting outside a Swords business while An Taoiseach Enda Kenny and other dignitaries were attending a function has been found guilty of the assault in her absence at Swords District Court.

Anna Harvey (53) did not attend the court for the hearing as according to defence solicitor Fiona D’Arcy, she ‘does not recognise this court.’

Judge Dermot Dempsey said he would proceed with the case on a not guilty plea. Harvey, of Macroom Avenue in Coolock is alleged to have assaulted Garda Keith Murphy of Swords Garda Station at Watery Lane in Swords on February 26th last year.

Sergeant Kevin Toner gave evidence that at 5.30pm a group of 20 to 25 water protesters gathered outside Bristol Myers Squibb where An Taoiseach and other dignitaries were attending a function.

‘The protesters attempted to obstruct the dignitaries and Harvey kneed Garda Murphy in the groin.’

Garda Keith Murphy said while he was on duty he identified Harvey, who was wearing a high viz bib, as one of the protesters.

‘She was very vocal and spoke using a mega phone. As An Taoiseach was driven through the gate of the factory Harvey tried to get to the front window of the car,’ said Gda Murphy. ‘She was extremely aggressive towards gardai.’

He said when An Taoiseach’s State car was existing the factory Harvey attempted to block the path of the vehicle.

‘She became angry and abusive towards gardai and without warning she kneed me in the groin,’ said Gda Murphy. ‘I was bent over in pain and found it difficult to arrest her.’

He said he was removed from the situation by other gardai and the protest continued when other State vehicles passed through the factor gates. He said he recognised Harvey as he had ‘come across her at a number of anti-water metre protests.’

Judge Dermot Dempsey found Harvey guilty of the offence in her absence and issued a bench warrant for her arrest for the purpose of sentencing her.

Fingal Independent

http://www.independent.ie/regionals/fingalindependent/news/protester-kneed-garda-in-the-groin-34474693.html

Posted in News Tagged with: ,

Willie Penrose’s driver quits after a week as it is revealed he is a convicted tax-dodger

willie-penroseTD

A Government minister’s personal driver has been forced to resign after the Irish Mail on Sunday revealed that he is a convicted tax dodger.

Labour Junior Minister for Housing and Planning Willie Penrose, who has a seat at Cabinet, hired former rally driver Pádraig Price as his driver just last week.

But an MoS investigation found that Mr Price is a serial tax-defaulter whose failed plant hire business has left him owing tens of thousands of euro to the taxman, as well as owing other creditors.

When the MoS contacted Mr Penrose for comment, the minister said he was unaware of Mr Price’s tax issues. Shortly after being contacted, Mr Penrose called the MoS to say he had approached Mr Price to discuss the issue, and that the chauffeur had offered his resignation.

Mr Price, from Ballynacargy, Co. Westmeath, near Mr Penrose’s home in the same townland, lived a fast-paced lifestyle in the early 2000s, competing in rally car races around Ireland and the UK in Ford Escorts and Toyota Celicas.

His driving experience made him eminently qualified to drive the minister to and from his office and his various engagements.

However, his plant hire business, which relied on work from the construction sector, hit the skids towards the end of the decade, leaving him owing thousands to the Revenue – and Mr Penrose red-faced for employing a tax-defaulter.

An examination of Land Registry records shows a number of judgments against Mr Price registered on his three-acre property in Ballintue, Co. Westmeath.

The records show that on October 3, 2005, a judgment of almost €60,000 was registered against Mr Price, with the note stating: ‘An office copy of an affidavit by Gerard Harrahill, Collector General and an officer of the Revenue Commissioners… of a judgment obtained by Liam J Irwin against Pádraig Price on March 4, 2005, in the High Court.’

It continues: ‘The amount owing on the said judgement is stated to be €57,725.61.’

On June 22, 2006, another judgment was registered in the Land Registry amounting to a further €6,108.95, with the note explaining it is ‘a judgment obtained by Gerard Harrahill of the Office of the Revenue Commissioners against Pádraig Price on February 24, 2005, in the District Court’.

Later in 2006, Mr Price appears on Revenue’s tax defaulters’ list, where he is recorded as a ‘plant hire operator’. It is noted that he was fined €750.

There are two further judgments, both registered in 2007, against his property in Land Registry documents, one in favour of insurance firm Aon amounting to €15,713.41.

The other results from a circuit court case brought by Navan plant hire businessman Patrick Kearns, for €31,243.07. It is understood that Mr Price was subcontracted by Mr Kearns to provide machinery for building sites in the midlands.

The MoS called Mr Penrose on Friday afternoon to ask if he knew he was employing a convicted tax defaulter. He immediately replied: ‘No, I wasn’t. I wasn’t aware of it.

‘Look, I’m not aware of his personal situation, you know. He was a lad from around home, that’s all. I just picked somebody who wasn’t working, you know. That’s all I know about him.’

Asked why he employed Mr Price, Mr Penrose, who also employs his brother Johnnie Penrose as his parliamentary assistant, said: ‘Well, I mean he’s somebody that was there… he’s not related to me in any way and he knows his way around, he’s a driver.

He used to do a bit of rally driving, you know,’ Mr Penrose added.

‘I understood he might have had a company or whatever and he was working but that’s years ago.’

Asked whether he would have hired him had he known about Mr Price’s tax problems, the minister said: ‘Well, I’m the type of person who thinks that all of those things are matters for people to deal with themselves. I’m not somebody who holds everybody in judgment – that’s being honest with you.

‘I’m not aware of his personal circumstances. I knew he had a contracting business years ago but I wouldn’t know the extent of his failure or anything like that.

‘I knew he had difficulties like everybody else, but that’s years ago, I think.’

‘It doesn’t affect his ability to drive. It doesn’t affect his ability to do his job with me.

‘I’ll certainly raise it with him,’ the minister promised, also committing to telling Mr Price that the MoS was offering an opportunity for him to respond himself. Asked if he thought that hiring Mr Price, whose construction sector business failed, was a conflict of interest, given his portfolio as housing and planning minister, Mr Penrose replied: ‘I don’t award any contracts. I don’t have anything to do with contracts or anything like that, but I’ll certainly consult him about it.’

A short while later, Mr Penrose called the MoS to say he had spoken to his driver. Asked if Mr Price had any comment on this story, the Longford-Westmeath TD said: ‘No, he has nothing.

‘Sure, I mean what has he to say? It appears his business was in a lot of difficulties actually, you know, the poor old divil.

‘I asked him there, I said it seems like there’s an issue there in relation to judgments. Well I suppose none of us are going to be safe in the next 20 years but anyway, the tax judgements, and he said, yeah, a number of years ago.’

‘I didn’t ask him about them but he said there’s an issue in relation to them and he proffered his resignation to me in order to avoid any potential embarrassment to me.’

‘I accepted it straight away. It’s regrettable because he was an excellent driver.’

Asked if Mr Price had satisfied the various judgments made against him, Mr Penrose said: ‘He mustn’t have, you know. He didn’t win the Lotto anyway or I’d have heard that.

‘He’s offered his resignation, I’ve accepted it, and that’s all I can do other than try to look for another driver.

‘It’s with regret I’ve accepted it but obviously he has to comply. As far as I was concerned, as long as I had somebody who wasn’t related to me and who was competent in the job, they were the parameters that I was interested in.’

Asked if he would have kept Mr Price as his driver had he not offered to resign, Mr Penrose said: ‘No. Once the situation was that he had taxation judgements against him in that context. You have to have tax clearance or whatever, we all must have tax clearance.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1375333/Irish-minister-Willie-Penroses-driver-quits-revealed-convicted-tax-dodger.html#ixzz4EOSY9r7C

Willie-Penrose-TD-BL

 

 

I am writing to inform you that over the weekend I was informed from an activist via social media that Willie Penrose TD BL stated he had not received his payment from Robert Marren, Solicitor, Mullingar. I was also informed that he stated “He did not give a sh.. about my campaign to seek justice in the matter”

Read Here http://mikegavin83.com/solicitors/willie-penrose-td-bl/

 

Posted in News Tagged with: ,

Look who’s spending Mike Gavin’s Dept. of Agriculture Grants Paid to Feed the Farm Animals

Robertbmarren

Robert B Marren

We understand the following Robert B. Marren distributed the estate assets speedily over the Christmas period 2014 in the knowledge that 2 of the Elderly beneficiaries were actively attempting to retain a solicitor to act on their behalf to prevent him closing. Robert B. Marren threatened 2 of the elderly beneficiaries Mike Gavin (84) and his sister and coerced them to retain a solicitor to prevent him distributing the estate assets.

Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone facilitated Marren by failing to undertake the instructions given him through John Glynn Solicitors to prevent Marren closing in isolation to well-founded objections. Marren refused to award Michael Gavin the Department of Agriculture Grant monies.

Marren delayed making the decision regarding Michael Gavin’s share in the farming profits and rightful share of the grant monies received from the Department of Agriculture until the very end with the draft distribution account that contained countless errors on 18th September, 2014.
Elderly Michael Gavin was lied to countless times and led to believe that he would be refunded at closing by both Anne Sanford and Kathleen o’Keefe. Garda Tim Farrell Taughmaconnell was present on one occasion back in 2009 when Anne Sanford stated if Mikie needed money to feed the Farm animals he could go in to John Glynn Solicitor. The 2 sisters always assured Mikie that he would be compensated at closing.

Why did Mr. Robert Marren, Solicitor, Mullingar make a decision in March 2013 to accept Michael Gavin’s claim to owning half the livestock and all the sheep?
But yet for no logical reason refused to award Michael Gavin the net amount €116,789.11 due to him out of the Single Payment Entitlements representing Mike Gavin’s ½ share in the profits from farming the lands, which was also sent to Mr. Robert Marren, Solicitor, Mullingar on the 5th of December, 2015 for his consideration.


Marren awarded Elderly Michael Gavin and his widowed sister €12,500 plus interest less than what they were entitled to, and also held on to the funds from the land sale for nearly 2 years for no good reason.

Robert B. Marren did not provide a “detailed bill of costs” despite repeated persistent written requests. We are of the opinion that the devil is in the detail and that is why Marren refuses to furnish a “detailed bill of cost” for his excessive fee of €40,892.53.

Marren squandered the estate assets and hired an additional accountant to oversee the accounts. Marren did not seek approval for Damien Hannigan & Company Limited Chartered Accountant, Mullingar. Why was he hired against Mike Gavin’s explicate wishes to oversee the accounts of Catherine O’Conner. He charged in our opinion an excessive fee of €8,751.45 which we consider to be extremely expensive and an unnecessary expense.

Although he was hired to oversee the accounts his fee is in excess of Catherine O’Conner’s fee. John Glynn, Solicitor, Patrick Hogan & Co. did not put the Estate to the additional expense of hiring an additional Accountant so it begs the question why did Robert B. Marren? He refused to provide the correct invoice for Catherine O’Conner. Her invoice states Total Amount Due €584.25 while Cash Account dated 18th July, 2014 “Fees paid to Catherine O’ Connor €6,857.25. We are of the opinion that Marren refuses to provide the correct invoice for Catherine O’Connor because it was she who did the work and Marren’s accountant’s invoice will highlight the work duplication.

Willie-Penrose-TD-BL
The Estate was charged €1,230 for Willie Penrose’s opinion but no invoice was provided despite repeated persistent written requests.
Peter D. Jones State Solicitor has yet to respond to Elderly Michael Gavin’s request for 7 pieces of evidence and answers to 20 questions. Why?
 We understand Solicitor Financial Elder Abuse Greed and Collusion and Corruption

Please Read http://mikegavin83.com/…/Solicitor-Financial-ElderAbuse… you are more than welcome to contact Robert B Marren, his solicitor Peter D Jones and the law Society of Ireland who threatened to block Mike Gavin’s emails and stated that Robert Marren followed his clients instructions meaning the other beneficiaries. We are also intrigued to know what was Willie Penrose’s opinion and whether or not he was paid as the estate was charged for same. Thank You

To commit fraud is an offense in Ireland. But the prosecution will depend very much on where you reside on the social scale!

Protest-July-29-Mullingar

Calling on all Groups and Activists to Stand in Solidarity in Mullingar from 2 pm Friday July 29th and put an end to the ongoing corruption in this Country.
There’s strength in numbers and until all we come together in unity and stand sidebyside we will NOT defeat the corruption our Judicial System.
UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL
Please share and invite as many as possible.
STOP SOLICITORS ABUSING
THE ELDERLY NOW!
PROTEST IN MULLINGAR TOWN
CENTRE FRIDAY 29th July @ 2PM
https://www.facebook.com/events/899426396832896/
Read Full Story http://mikegavin83.com/
Sign Petition http://mikegavin83.com/petition/
YouTube https://youtu.be/l-3RaeZmUI8

Posted in News Tagged with: , ,

Solicitors Financial Elder Abuse Exposed in Rural Ireland

[wppdf id=’1288′]

Posted in Uncategorized

So What Exactly Were You Doing Alone in Your Room that child Judge Harvey Kenny?

Judge-Harvey-Kenny

Judge Harvey Kenny

It is public knowledge that retired Circuit Court Judge Harvey Kenny was a thug, but what was his fixation with being in a darkened room, behind the Courtroom, ALONE with young children?

While sitting on the bench between 1994 and 2009, Fine Gael appointed Circuit Judge Harvey Kenny ruled with an iron fist in 3 Circuit Court areas, Midlands, Western and on occasions as a stand-in Judge in his own native Southern Circuit.

Never far from controversy, he is on record as insulting Nigerians and calling an 18 year old defendant a fat fool. This is not the kind of behaviour that is expected from someone in his position of power. But as is the case with the Judiciary, he was untouchable.

So untouchable he believed himself to be, that he was rightly cheesed off when losing a case he took himself against Budget Travel in 1998 for some holiday to Florida which went pear shaped.

This behaviour from such a pillar of society only became public knowledge because the cases were heard in public. But what was this very powerful thug’s judicial behaviour like regarding the top secret, media banned, IN CAMERA COURTS, where family law matters such as divorce, separation, maintenance, custody and child access were being decided upon?

Unlike what would be considered normal in matters regarding what is in a child’s best interests, Judge Kenny was always opposed to considering the opinion of Child Psychologists in cases where guardianship, custody or access rights were being decided.

He always refused to read such reports, insisting instead on seeing children himself, ALONE, in a darkened room behind the Courtroom. Some of these children were as young as 5 years of age, dragged into a Courtroom setting by unscrupulous solicitors and barristers to appear before a middle aged, black caped man to effectively decide between ‘Mammy’ or ‘Daddy’.

Anyone who ever went through the family law court system in pursuit of maintaining a continuous relationship with their children will understand know adversarial such proceedings are. But such treatment of vulnerable young children by the Court system is nothing short of child abuse, plain and simple.

Judge Harvey Kenny, a tall imposing individual, straddled into Court Buildings usually wearing a bowler hat. His demeanour and stature had all the hallmarks of a ‘Hanging Judge’ from Ireland’s dark and troubled past and there is no doubt that he would have donned the black cap with relish, even for the young 18 year old who he called a “fat fool” who was before him on minor charges in Castlebar Courthouse in January 2000.

Any request to Judge Harvey Kenny by legal representatives for parents seeking guardianship, custody or access to allow a psychological report take precedence over he himself acting like a child care specialist was met with robust and vocal refusal.

He was a bully and the barristers and court staff were frightened of him. So how must a frightened and vulnerable young child have felt in a darkened room with such a vile individual? On one particular occasion in the 1990s Judge Harvey Kenny had a 6 year old boy in his room for 45 minutes.

The child had been escorted to the Judge’s ‘Private Room’ by a female barrister who gave the child a bag of sweets and while walking towards the door told him “make sure you tell the nice Judge that you do not want to see your Daddy anymore”.

An hour earlier Judge Harvey Kenny, when presented with an available psychological report, flung it to the floor and proclaimed “I do not believe in psychologist’s reports, I will see the little fellow myself”. The child’s father never saw his son grow up after that. The available psychological report had recommended that it was in the child’s best interests to have continuing contact with his father.

Many people who can recall Judge Kenny’s modus operandi regarding the top secret Family Law Courts were suspicious at the time that something untoward was going on inside those darkened private rooms. Harvey Kenny was not the only Judge to see children.

Other Judges also did, but not to the same intensity as Kenny and never without also considering available psychological evidence and NEVER being ALONE with the child. Kenny’s successor Judge Anthony Kennedy NEVER saw children himself, stating that “independent psychological evidence was good enough for him because he himself was not qualified in such matters.”

Given Judge Harvey Kenny’s vile demeanour and behaviour in the public courts and given his insistence on being alone with very young children, nothing has assured the many parents who fell victim to him in the Midlands and West that there was not something evil happening behind those closed doors.

When it emerged in the early 2000s that Circuit Court Judge Brian Curtain got away with being in possession of child porn, then nothing can ever be ruled out when it comes to these excessively powerful political

The Real Irish Media – Can you handle the truth?

Posted in The Real Irish Media - Can you handle the truth? Tagged with: ,

Joan Burton The Thatcherite that Ireland’s poor must never forgive

JOAN BURTON The Thatcherite that Ireland's poor must never forgive

As Minister for Social Protection between 2011 and early this year, Joan Burton caused hunger and homelessness to the most vulnerable in society and she did it with relish. In 2013 she set rent supplement upper thresholds so low that only renting a small shed to live in would qualify for rent supplement if you told the Community Welfare Officer the truth about how much rent you were paying.

The highest monthly rent on which rent supplement is allowed for a single person living alone ranges from €290 in County Longford to €520 in Dublin and North Wicklow. This means that tenants, in order to avoid living on the streets, must do deals with their prospective landlords and pretend that they are only paying the upper limit, when in actual fact in many instances they are secretly paying up to 50% more in order to qualify for Rent Supplement. This is nothing short of disgusting, given that it has created a rogue landlord’s charter which has the effect of the tenant begging to be ripped off.

To hear the usual suspects i.e. so called experts, journalists, academics and other well heeled posh voiced know alls talk about homelessness ad nauseum on tv programmes such as ‘Tonight With Vincent Browne’ is cringe worthy, because not one of them are aware, or care less, about this anomaly, an anomaly which is one of the major causes of homelessness. The government’s response to this was that to increase the threshold would result in landlords raising rents was a cop out, as it is happening anyway. Burton was begged by homeless activists such as Peter McVerry on a constant basis to raise the thresholds and increase the actual allowances but ‘the lady was not for turning’.

Now that Burton and Labour are gone from government one would fear that the status quo would prevail at best or the rent supplement situation would get even worse under a Fine Gael one party government. But not so apparently. News breaking today reveals that next month the government intend raising the rent caps by between 15% and 30% and apparently this is part of the deal negotiated by Fianna Fail as one of their conditions for supporting the minority government.

Whatever the truth about this and whatever political maneuverings Fianna Fail and Fine Gael engaged in a few months ago, the government’s coffers were not any better last March than they were during pre budget submissions 6 months earlier. Which proves that Joan Burton and Labour could not care less about homelessnes. Joan Burton and Labour prided themselves on being the poor man’s watchdog in government, claiming that things would have been a lot worse for the poor if they were not in government keeping tabs on Fine Gael. Well obviously not so.

By their own assertion, Labour’s achievements in the 5 years they were in government were the Marriage Equality Referendum and the abortion legislation introduced during a drunken Dail orgy on a hot summer night in 2013. Which in turn proves that Labour are so fixated with moral issues that they are indifferent to the needs of the poor and vulnerable that they claim to represent.

Protest-July-29-Mullingar

https://www.facebook.com/events/1045194718896113/

Calling on all Groups and Activists to Stand in Solidarity in Mullingar from 2 pm Friday July 29th and put an end to the ongoing corruption in this Country.
There’s strength in numbers and until all we come together in unity and stand sidebyside we will NOT defeat the corruption our Judicial System.
UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL
Please share and invite as many as possible.
STOP SOLICITORS ABUSING
THE ELDERLY NOW!
PROTEST IN MULLINGAR TOWN
CENTRE FRIDAY 29th July @ 2PM
https://www.facebook.com/events/1045194718896113/

Please Share Far & Wide

Posted in The Real Irish Media - Can you handle the truth? Tagged with: